Governor of Nebraska, Pete Rickets, and Governess Susanne Ricketts, refuse to be summonsed to court, sheriff called in.

We can do this the easy way, or the hard way.

The Governors of the state are conspiring to deny my right to travel the open roads in their jurisdiction, they are summonsed to appear in a common law ‘court of record’ court (the highest court of the people) and they refuse to comply.

To follow case and view all files of the case:

Click PAYPAL at top, then BUTTON M1Sp- 48.

Protected: Hansen v. Ricketts, ‘Common Law Court of Record’ claim, action, against NEBRASKA Governor for failure to instruct state employees of man’s “not for hire” travel right. To perpetually follow this case purchase M1S-48, 5$. Hansen opted to use small claims county court to convene his right to the highest courts of America, a common law court of record, trial by jury. Cost 26$.

((Focus on the red letters below. “American” is by right, “US citizen” is consent to subjection, governance, by congressional written law. Oral oath is the only way there. One can only be a US citizen by birth until the age of 18 “if” their parents were US citizens, then one must take the oath personally, the oath is contract law, not general law, “consent of the governed.))

USC 8 § 1421. Naturalization authority

(a) Authority in Attorney General

The sole authority to naturalize persons as citizens of the United States is conferred upon the Attorney General.

(b) Court authority to administer oaths

(1) Jurisdiction

Subject to section 1448(c) of this title

(A) General jurisdiction

Except as provided in subparagraph (B), each applicant for naturalization may choose to have the oath of allegiance under section 1448(a) of this title administered by the Attorney General or by an eligible court described in paragraph (5). Each such eligible court shall have authority to administer such oath of allegiance to persons residing within the jurisdiction of the court.

(B) Exclusive authority

An eligible court described in paragraph (5) that wishes to have exclusive authority to administer the oath of allegiance under section 1448(a) of this title to persons residing within the jurisdiction of the court during the period described in paragraph (3)(A)(i) shall notify the Attorney General of such wish and, subject to this subsection, shall have such exclusive authority with respect to such persons during such period.

(2) Information

(A) General information

In the case of a court exercising authority under paragraph (1), in accordance with procedures established by the Attorney General-

(i) the applicant for naturalization shall notify the Attorney General of the intent to be naturalized before the court, and

(ii) the Attorney General-

(I) shall forward to the court (not later than 10 days after the date of approval of an application for naturalization in the case of a court which has provided notice under paragraph (1)(B)) such information as may be necessary to administer the oath of allegiance under section 1448(a) of this title, and

(II) shall promptly forward to the court a certificate of naturalization (prepared by the Attorney General).

(B) Assignment of individuals in the case of exclusive authority

If an eligible court has provided notice under paragraph (1)(B), the Attorney General shall inform each person (residing within the jurisdiction of the court), at the time of the approval of the person’s application for naturalization, of-

(i) the court’s exclusive authority to administer the oath of allegiance under section 1448(a) of this title to such a person during the period specified in paragraph (3)(A)(i), and

(ii) the date or dates (if any) under paragraph (3)(B) on which the court has scheduled oath administration ceremonies.

If more than one eligible court in an area has provided notice under paragraph (1)(B), the Attorney General shall permit the person, at the time of the approval, to choose the court to which the information will be forwarded for administration of the oath of allegiance under this section.

(3) Scope of exclusive authority

(A) Limited period and advance notice required

The exclusive authority of a court to administer the oath of allegiance under paragraph (1)(B) shall apply with respect to a person-

(i) only during the 45-day period beginning on the date on which the Attorney General certifies to the court that an applicant is eligible for naturalization, and

(ii) only if the court has notified the Attorney General, prior to the date of certification of eligibility, of the day or days (during such 45-day period) on which the court has scheduled oath administration ceremonies.

(B) Authority of Attorney General

Subject to subparagraph (C), the Attorney General shall not administer the oath of allegiance to a person under subsection (a) during the period in which exclusive authority to administer the oath of allegiance may be exercised by an eligible court under this subsection with respect to that person.

(C) Waiver of exclusive authority

Notwithstanding the previous provisions of this paragraph, a court may waive exclusive authority to administer the oath of allegiance under section 1448(a) of this title to a person under this subsection if the Attorney General has not provided the court with the certification described in subparagraph (A)(i) within a reasonable time before the date scheduled by the court for oath administration ceremonies. Upon notification of a court’s waiver of jurisdiction, the Attorney General shall promptly notify the applicant.

(4) Issuance of certificates

The Attorney General shall provide for the issuance of certificates of naturalization at the time of administration of the oath of allegiance.

(5) Eligible courts

For purposes of this section, the term “eligible court” means-

(A) a district court of the United States in any State, or

(B) any court of record in any State having a seal, a clerk, and jurisdiction in actions in law or equity, or law and equity, in which the amount in controversy is unlimited.

(c) Judicial review

A person whose application for naturalization under this subchapter is denied, after a hearing before an immigration officer under section 1447(a) of this title, may seek review of such denial before the United States district court for the district in which such person resides in accordance with chapter 7 of title 5. Such review shall be de novo, and the court shall make its own findings of fact and conclusions of law and shall, at the request of the petitioner, conduct a hearing de novo on the application.

(d) Sole procedure

A person may only be naturalized as a citizen of the United States in the manner and under the conditions prescribed in this subchapter and not otherwise.

(June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title III, ch. 2, §310,   §25, July 7, 1958,   §20(c), Mar. 18, 1959,   §17, Sept. 26, 1961,   §9(s), Oct. 24, 1988,   title IV, §401(a), Nov. 29, 1990,   title I, §102(a), title III, §305(a), Dec. 12, 1991,  1749 title II, §219(u), Oct. 25, 1994,  .)

Amendments

1994-Subsec. (b)(5)(A).  substituted “district court” for “District Court”.

1991-Subsec. (b).  §102(a), amended subsec. (b) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (b) read as follows: “An applicant for naturalization may choose to have the oath of allegiance under section 1448(a) of this titleadministered by the Attorney General or by any district court of the United States for any State or by any court of record in any State having a seal, a clerk, and jurisdiction in actions in law or equity, or law and equity, in which the amount in controversy is unlimited. The jurisdiction of all courts in this subsection specified to administer the oath of allegiance shall extend only to persons resident within the respective jurisdiction of such courts.”

 §305(a), substituted “district court” for “District Court”.

1990– amended section generally, substituting provisions authorizing Attorney General to naturalize persons as citizens, for provisions granting certain courts exclusive jurisdiction to naturalize.

1988-Subsec. (e).  struck out subsec. (e) which read as follows: “Notwithstanding the provisions of section 405(a), any petition for naturalization filed on or after September 26, 1961, shall be heard and determined in accordance with the requirements of this subchapter.”

1961-Subsec. (e).  added subsec. (e).

1959-Subsec. (a).  struck out provisions which conferred jurisdiction on District Court for Territory of Hawaii. See section 91 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, and notes thereunder.

1958-Subsec. (a).  struck out provisions which conferred jurisdiction on District Court for Territory of Alaska. See section 81A of Title 28, which established a United States District Court for the State of Alaska.

Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by  effective as if included in the enactment of the Immigration Act of 1990,  see section 219(dd) of  set out as a note under section 1101 of this title.

Effective Date of 1991 Amendment

 title I, §102(c), Dec. 12, 1991,  , provided that: “The amendments made by this title [amending this section and sections 1448, 1450, and 1455 of this title] shall take effect 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 12, 1991].”

Amendment by section 305(a) of  effective as if included in the enactment of the Immigration Act of 1990,  see section 310(1) of  set out as a note under section 1101 of this title.

Effective Date of 1990 Amendment; Savings Provision

 title IV, §408, Nov. 29, 1990,  , as amended by  title III, §305(n), Dec. 12, 1991,  , provided that:

“(a) 

“(1) .-No court shall have jurisdiction, under section 310(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act [8 U.S.C. 1421(a)], to naturalize a person unless a petition for naturalization with respect to that person has been filed with the court before October 1, 1991.

“(2) 

“(A) .-Except as provided in subparagraph (B), any petition for naturalization which may be pending in a court on October 1, 1991, shall be heard and determined in accordance with the requirements of law in effect when the petition was filed.

“(B) .-In the case of any petition for naturalization which may be pending in any court on January 1, 1992, the petitioner may withdraw such petition and have the petitioner’s application for naturalization considered under the amendments made by this title [amending this section, sections 1101, 1423, 1424, 1426 to 1430, 1433, 1435 to 1440, 1441 to 1451, and 1455 of this title, and section 1429 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and repealing section 1459 of this title], but only if the petition is withdrawn not later than 3 months after the effective date.

“(3) .-Except as otherwise provided in this section, the amendments made by this title are effective as of the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 29, 1990].

“(b) .-The Attorney General shall prescribe regulations (on an interim, final basis or otherwise) to implement the amendments made by this title on a timely basis.

“(c) .-The amendments to section 339 of the Immigration and Nationality Act [8 U.S.C. 1450] (relating to functions and duties of clerks) shall not apply to functions and duties respecting petitions filed before October 1, 1991.

“(d) .-(1) Nothing contained in this title [amending this section, sections 1101, 1423, 1424, 1426 to 1430, 1433, 1435 to 1440, 1441 to 1451, and 1455 of this title, and section 1429 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, repealing section 1459 of this title, and enacting provisions set out as a note under section 1440 of this title], unless otherwise specifically provided, shall be construed to affect the validity of any declaration of intention, petition for naturalization, certificate of naturalization, certification of citizenship, or other document or proceeding which is valid as of the effective date; or to affect any prosecution, suit, action, or proceedings, civil or criminal, brought, or any status, condition, right in process of acquisition, act, thing, liability, obligation, or matter, civil or criminal, done or existing, as of the effective date.

“(2) As to all such prosecutions, suits, actions, proceedings, statutes, conditions, rights, acts, things, liabilities, obligations, or matters, the provisions of law repealed by this title are, unless otherwise specifically provided, hereby continued in force and effect.

“(e) .-The amendments made by section 404 [amending section 1426 of this title] (relating to treatment of service in armed forces of a foreign country) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 29, 1990] and shall apply to exemptions from training or service obtained before, on, or after such date.

“(f) .-Section 405 [enacting provisions formerly set out as a note under section 1440 of this title] (relating to naturalization of natives of the Philippines through active-duty service under United States command during World War II) shall become effective on May 1, 1991, without regard to whether regulations to implement such section have been issued by such date.”

Abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service and Transfer of Functions

For abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service, transfer of functions, and treatment of related references, see note set out under section 1551 of this title.

Admission of Alaska and Hawaii to Statehood

Alaska was admitted into the Union on Jan. 3, 1959, on issuance of Proc. No. 3269, Jan. 3, 1959, 24 F.R. 81, 73 Stat. c16, and Hawaii was admitted into the Union on Aug. 21, 1959, on issuance of Proc. No. 3309, Aug. 21, 1959, 24 F.R. 6868, 73 Stat. c74. For Alaska Statehood Law, see  July 7, 1958,  , set out as a note preceding former section 21 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions. For Hawaii Statehood Law, see  Mar. 18, 1959,  , set out as a note preceding former section 491 of Title 48.

You can join this Facebook dialog for free.

The sole topic shall be how to convien, operate, and proceed in a common law court of record.

https://www.facebook.com/CLCRecord/

This court is the highest court of the American land.

Intentional divergence from this topic will not  be allowed.

I, Paul John Hansen, shall be the administrator, and I believe this to be one of the most important institutes to be brought back into our communities in full force.

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Land Ownership Record, Private Filing For Public Record. (Not a contract.)                    http://goo.gl/jpqeme

>>

1606 Corby, *City of Omaha, *Douglas, *Nebraska            > DEED
Owner Prior to 7/21/2016 Paul John Hansen, a man.
Conveyed by Deed on 7/21/2016 to Dominion Won, a church ministerial trust, office mailing location at 16910 – 59th Avenue NE, Suite 210 Arlington, Washington.
The subject land is described as: Millard & Caldwell’s, LOT 20, East 50 foot, West 100 foot, Lot size 50′ x 86.625′ as .0994 acer, as surveyed, filed for record in Douglas County Registry of Deeds, Nebraska, land not evidenced as being of the United States.

>>>

3704 HAWTHORNE AVE., *City of Omaha, *Douglas, *Nebraska            > DEED
Owner Prior to ?/??/2016 Paul John Hansen, a man.
Conveyed by Deed on ?/21/2016 to Dominion Won, a church ministerial trust, office mailing location at 16910 – 59th Avenue NE, Suite 210 Arlington, Washington.
The subject land is described as: RESERVOIR SUB DIV LOT 49 BLOCK A S 138 FT LT 48 & W 4 S 140 FT LT 49 4 X 140-50 X 138, or 140.5 x 138 = .4451 acer, as surveyed, filed for record in Douglas County Registry of Deeds, Nebraska, land not evidenced as being of the United States. (Mailing location as – 3704 HAWTHORNE AV. Omaha, Nebraska, without the United States.)

Todd Schmaderer, a man,
505 S 15
OMAHA, NE 68102
Emailed > http://opd.ci.omaha.ne.us/contact-us

City of Omaha Chief of Police Todd Schmaderer refuses to answer my basic question of where a record is keep where the CITY OF OMAHA took my perfectly good automobile off of my property and apparently sold it at one of their actions. He refuses to answer my mailing, and my request by email, he just simply said he does not see what my question is. And acts like he does not have the answer, or knows where to send me. If need be I’ll summons him into a small claims court of record court and force him to answer. That CITY OF OMAHA Impound also refuses to respond (Ben.Gray@cityofomaha.org).

See Letters that have been mailed several times > “LETTER

BEST of the Best, Clips, Speeches, etc.

Posted: June 27, 2016 by admin in Best of the Best

BEST of the Best, clips, speeches, etc. selected this month by Paul John Hansen.

Informative material that I believe stands out and is considered quality material to listen to at your leisure.

If you are interested in being noticed by email of a posting on here by title with brief description of content just email me and say add me to “Best of the Best”, and I’ll notice you when a new topic is added. You can email me to have your name removed at anytime. I’ll only likely post one a month at best.

  1. Loaded 7-30-2016 – ‘Tools of Dominion‘,       PDF                    (1287 pages) [dbox]        Gary North’s Tools of Dominion: The Case Laws of Exodus is perhaps one of the most important books ever to be written during the 20th century. Like Rushdoony’s Magnum Opus, The Institutes of Biblical Law, Tools of Dominion is a work focusing its commentary on the long neglected aspect of scriptural cause and effect otherwise known as casuistry. Tools of Dominion seeks to provide the reader with a thorough understanding and explanation of economics according to scriptural axioms found in the Old Testament case laws. North says that there is a direct correlation between what a society experiences in terms of social, economic and cultural decline and when it behaves in disobedience to God’s declared laws as enunciated in the Old Covenant. Likewise he posits the truth that the positive sanctions of the covenant are also in effect. Thus, nations are blessed socially, economically and culturally when it obeys God’s Laws.Following the form and thinking of previous free market scholars, Von Mises, Hayek, Friedman, etc. North outlines their economic outlines to construct a biblically based free enterprise alternative. North establishes the idea, with a plethora of Scriptural evidence I might add, that economics is not a neutral discipline devoid of divine epistemological presuppositions. On the contrary, given that everything under the sun is created by God, North contends, so too is economics. The discipline itself comes from the mind of God and thus its assumptions concerning value, trade, human interaction, etc. Hence, North makes pertinent queries to help us answer the questions that economics seeks to answer. For example, why is gold valued all over the world? Why does gold have value? Who imputed value to gold and why is that authority to be trusted?

 

 

M1S-45– Counsel Contract, Agreement. Safe from practicing without a license. ($2.50)     Click > “HERE” to order.

A contract that stops US judges from interfering with your right to counsel (none bar attorney counsel).

How you can use this document to have me, or others, join your court proceedings, in person (seated right beside you), or telephonically, without fear of anyone being challenged as to “practicing law without a license”.

They hate it when you have ready access to knowledgable counsel.

Counsel is a right due to all Americans, as evidenced in the “Bill of Rights”. Rights can not be denied without the court losing subject matter jurisdiction.

Such rights are ‘not‘ afforded to US citizens, seek counsel time with me for this complicated determination.

In 2015 I was in Federal Court and demanded this right, denied, and my Federal Prosecutor leaned over and said (whispered); “you may have just won your case”. The major part of the case was won, the first win in the Federal Northern District in 10 years. They dismissed the case the day before the trial.

 

To:

Pete Ricketts

State of Nebraska Governor

Office of the Governor
P.O. Box 94848
Lincoln, NE 68509-4848

Mailed June 13, 2016   (□ mailing affidavit attached)

 

From:

Paul John Hansen

1548 N 19th Street,

Omaha, Nebraska 68110,

without the United States.

 

RE: Notice to Governor, Pete Ricketts, of the State of Nebraska of ongoing violations of my right to travel on the open passageways of Nebraska.

 

Attached, EXHIBIT “RL1”, you will see a letter evidenced (video recorded) as being mailed to you, no response has been received from your office as of this letter.

 

As Governor of the State of Nebraska I must inform you that the acts that you have allowed your agents, as they are operating on the land called Nebraska, have consistently violated my rights as a man. Specifically, my right to pass upon the open highways of Nebraska, in a not “for hire” capacity. To my knowledge, I never travel on land that is owned by the “State” of Nebraska, or more accurately land owned by “The United States of America” within the exterior boundaries of Nebraska.

 

As I pass over these open roads, as not “for hire”, I have been harassed by agents that claim to be officially operating under your employment. These agents claim that they have instructions to regulate my travel by imposing Nebraska Legislative written law from what they call the Motor Vehicles written laws found in the said Legislatures depository of written law upon my activity, my automobile, and me personally.

 

These same agents, City of Omaha Police Officers, Nebraska State Patrol, Douglas County Sheriff, Sarpy County Sheriff, and others, demand that I must have the following to travel in my not “for hire” capacity:

  1. That I must have a State of Nebraska Operators License,
  2. That I must have proof of liability insurance for my automobile,
  3. That my automobile must be registered and have current state plates.

 

I am regularly harassed by your agents. They have written citations and delivered me for prosecution by county prosecutors in United States courts called county courts. They have towed my automobiles, fined me, arrested me, and imprisoned me, all under the false pretense of regulation under the State of Nebraska Motor Vehicle legislative bills.

 

I have duly noticed the said prosecutors and the courts, by certified copies, in open courts of record, as judicial notice, as offered exhibit, of the following:

Motor Vehicles

Chapter 129

5388o Sec. 150 [Municipal ordinances.]

(House Role No. 146)

[Introduced by Mr. Hand]

A Bill – FOR AN ACT requiring registration of motor vehicles and regulating their use or operation upon the highways or streets.

Laws of Nebraska of 1905

**Specific attention to – 5388o Sec. 150 [Municipal ordinances.]

 

As you will see that the Motor Vehicles laws have a subject clearly embodied in the bill, that is “for hire”. Being that the State of Nebraska state Constitution clearly limits each bill to be of a ***“single subject”, therefore to have the Motor Vehicles law to apply there must be an activity of “for hire” as to all application of the titled Motor Vehicle law.

 

Your perpetual allowance to such harassment, deprivation of rights, false arrest, false prosecution, false imprisonment, extortion, can only be done in your private capacity, for the written law dose not authorize such regulation upon ones acts evidenced as not “for hire”.

 

THIS NOTICE/COMPLAINT IS AN AFFIDAVIT OF OBLIGATION IN THE NORMAL COMMERCIAL SENSE AND AS SUCH IS A SECURITY REPRESENTING ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE. ANY FAILURE OR REFUSAL TO PROSECUTE YOUR DUTY RELEASES JURISDICTION TO ME.

 

Contact Sarpy County, and Douglas County, prosecutors immediately and inform them of their misapplication of the Motor Vehicles written laws as associated to State of Nebraska v. Paul John Hansen past cases.

Ledger of Damages are 100 US Dollars each day my right to travel has been deprived, this I’ll ask a common law jury to award if need be.

 

Right to travel is not to be regulated except by common law principals.

 

___________________   Paul John Hansen

 

**5388o Sec. 150 [Municipal ordinances.] Cities and towns shall have no power to pass, in force or maintain any ordinance, rule or regulation requiring of any owner or operator of a motor vehicle any license or permit to use the public highways or exclude or prohibit any motor vehicle whose owner has complied with section two (2) or section four (4) of this act from the free use of such highways, and all such ordinances, rules or regulations now in force, are hereby declared to be of no validity or effect: provided that nothing in this act shall be construed as limiting the power of local authorities to make and force and maintain an ordinance, rule or regulations, in addition to the provisions of this act, affecting motor vehicles which are offered to the public for hire. [I.d., § 11.]

 

 

–Proof of Service / Notice, Aided administrative by Notary Public–

 

This Affidavit is submitted for the record as facts that are currently known by _________________________________, a Notary Public, and are directly related to the attached Certified Mailing with Return Receipt US Postal Service mailing, as preformed on __-__-2016, to the below listed addressed individual.

  1. Affiant shall hereinafter mean ____________________________.
  2. That Affiant is acting as a Notary Public for evidence of service / notice / administratively, with the attached documents, process, notice, presentment.
  3. That the attached mailing contents were mailed to the following:   Pete Ricketts Office of the Governor, P.O. Box 94848   Lincoln, NE 68509-4848.

Registered Mailing No. _________________________________________ on __-__ -2016.

  1. That Affiant loaded the above listed addressed envelope with all original ink signed documents, as hereto attached, and then Affiant sealed the envelope and delivered the same to the UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE for mailing, with post paid for mailing on the date of __-__-2016.
  2. That Affiant / Notary entered in his Register Log Book what was sealed / mailed, as __-__-2016 (__) total individual pages, (EXHIBIT “____” as __ pages) in the said Certified Mailing envelope, with mailing reference numbers, exact copy retained.

5a. That the contents of mailing where: _____________________________________________.

  1. Total mailings are as followed: a. __ page NOTICE, time stamped by the court on the date of __-__-2016. b. __ page NOTICE in affidavit form. c. __ page this Mailing Affidavit, as signed.

I, ___________________________ declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing Affidavit is true and correct. Executed on __ day of the __ month of 2016. Jurat: As sworn to before the below signed Notary this __ day of __ month, 2016, Oath: I, __________________________, solemnly swear that the contents of the above mailing Affidavit subscribed is correct and true.

______________________________

 

Mailing Affiant – ______________________

State of ______________

County of __________________

Personally appeared before me the undersigned, an officer authorized to administer oaths, ____________________________, with valid identification, and/or personally known to me, who first being duly sworn, deposes and says that the forgoing, __ page, instrument was subscribed and sworn before me, this __ day of __ Month 2013.

___________________________ Notary

 

 

□ Original is retained fully signed by ________________________, in ink, and said signature was fully verified by notary signature with notary seal. □ Green Card Retained.

 

***State of Nebraska Constitution 1875- III-14. Bills and resolutions read by title; printing; vote for final passage; bills to contain one subject; amended section to be set forth; signing of bills.

Every bill and resolution shall be read by title when introduced, and a printed copy thereof provided for the use of each member. The bill and all amendments thereto shall be printed and presented before the vote is taken upon its final passage and shall be read at large unless three-fifths of all the members elected to the Legislature vote not to read the bill and all amendments at large. No vote upon the final passage of any bill shall be taken until five legislative days after its introduction nor until it has been on file for final reading and passage for at least one legislative day. No bill shall contain more than one subject, and the subject shall be clearly expressed in the title. No law shall be amended unless the new act contains the section or sections as amended and the section or sections so amended shall be repealed. The Lieutenant Governor, or the Speaker if acting as presiding officer, shall sign, in the presence of the Legislature while it is in session and capable of transacting business, all bills and resolutions passed by the Legislature.

 

 

Chronology:

Emailed the same to Pete Ricketts on 6/13/2016 at 4:30pm. Email as evidence of communication. No email response indicates that the email failed.

 

NOTICE – If I do not get a written response in the next 7 days I will commence a common law claim for damages before a jury of 12 men.

I require a document with your seal as evidence to present to any agent of the State of Nebraska to assure of the above evidenced “right of travel”.

 

To:
CITY OF OMAHA IMPOUND FACILITIES CORPORATION,
Registered Agent and Office Address
Paul D. Kratz
SUITE 804
1819 FARNAM STREET
OMAHA, NE 68183

To:
Todd Schmaderer, a man,
505 S 15
OMAHA, NE 68102
Emailed > http://opd.ci.omaha.ne.us/contact-us

To:
Omaha Police Department
7809 F Street
Omaha, NE 68127
Telephone: (402) 444-5782
Fax: (402) 444-4988

From:
Paul John Hansen, a man
2715 S 44 St.
Omaha, Nebraska [68110],
without the United States.
402-957-2853
pauljjhansen@hotmail.com

Re: Automobile towed without authorization:

On or about the dates between October 23, 2014 and October 31, 2014 my car was towed from the drive way of my house with a mailing location of 1548 N 19th Street (or 1548 Florence Boulevard).
There is no evidence that the said location of the parked car was on land owned by the CITY OF OMAHA, DOUGLAS COUNTY, STATE OF NEBRASKA, or the UNITED STATES.
There is no evidence that the towed car was owned by CITY OF OMAHA, DOUGLAS COUNTY, STATE OF NEBRASKA, or the UNITED STATES.
There is no evidence that the towed car was registered, or included in any contract, with the CITY OF OMAHA, DOUGLAS COUNTY, STATE OF NEBRASKA, or the UNITED STATES.
There is no evidence that I, the signed, as owner, gave permission to any person to tow the subject car.
There is no evidence that a court order,warrant,or judgment, exists that gives instruction to tow the subject car.
There is no evidence that the territorial jurisdiction is not of a common law court of record (community convened court,non-state legislative court.) Said court shall determine the law, facts, and damages, and the judgment is independent of the United States Courts.
The 7th Amendment states: ‘In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall
exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury,
shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of
the common law.’
There is no evidence that the value of the car is less than “twenty dollars” as a dollar was defined in the year of 1791.
There is no evidence that no other man owned the subject car other than Paul John Hansen,the signed.
The owner of the subject car was clearly made know by the “Notice” on the plate, and by the documents laying on the dash of the car when towed, directing all to see “owner of record”:

Self Registration, Public Record, of My Motorcycles, Automobiles


004. Year- 1995, Make Ford, Model Taurus GL/SE, Color- White, Chassis Number 1FALP52U4SG241419.  Previous Owner- JEFF WALLICK / BARBARA A WALLICK, RR2 BOX 280, OSMOND, NE 68765. NOTICE – Collateral lien for three and one-half troy ounce of gold,  number 1-17-14-714-8940-a. Owner is a man called Paul John Hansen 1548 N 19, Omaha, Nebraska an address without the United States, being not a resident of the United States, of ecclesiastical jurisdiction. For use not associated with hauling cargo or persons ‘for hire’, not owned by the United States or any state thereof. pauljjhansen@hotmail.com, 402-957-2853.

The plate on the car at the time of the tow was, in one inch letter, as follows:
–Private Household Good,
–Non-Commercial Use,
–Not For Hire.
402-957-2853 Paul John Hansen

The value of the car was equivalent to 1.666 ounces of gold (@1200$/oz) ($2000.00) at the time of the tow.
The value of the use of the car was .0083 ounces (10$) of gold per day.
The total damages caused by the man called Todd Schmadereris as follows:
a. Car value – 1.666 ounces of gold. > -$2,000.00
b. Loss of use value based on the above times 567 days (Oct 31, 2014 to May 20, 2016). -$5,670.00
-$7,670.00
NOTICE: THIS IS AN OFFICIAL COUNTER-FORFEITURE CLAIM FOR
DAMAGES AGAINST THE ABOVE NAMED WRONGDOERS AND
/ OR OBLIGATED PARTIES, AS WELL AS A NOTICE OF INTENT
TO LIEN, AND IS INTENDED TO MEET ALL NOTICE REQUIREMENTS FOR
ADDITIONAL LAWFUL ACTION AGAINST THEM SHOULD FURTHER
PURSUIT BECOME NECESSARY.

My claim herein is against the man called Todd Schmaderer.

The, subject car, automobile, was a:
Year -1995
Color -White
Model -Ford
Type -Taurus
Chassis Number – 1FALP52U4SG241419

I need the following from Todd Schmaderer for my claim:
Tow records of the incident.
Mans name that allegedly ticketed the car for tow.
Mans name that ordered the taking of my car.
Copy of any citation associated?
What day was it towed?
Who towed the car?
What happened to the car?
Where is my property (car) now?
Who is responsible for keeping records of all cars towed for the CITY OF OMAHA.
Communication from Todd Schmaderer within three (3) days that he will answer this claim within thirty (30) days from the date he received it.
This document was emailed to> http://opd.ci.omaha.ne.us/contact-us for service upon Todd Schmaderer. (Sending Computer Screen Shot retained.)

5-17-2016 _Paul John Hansen_________________,
Paul John Hansen

cc: Retained by two mailing witnesses #4563, and #6844,mailing letter and content video recorded mailing,and emailing ‘Screen Shot’. [Dropbox file – “Taurus Tow 2014”.]

Common law ‘court of record’ defined – Due Process by a Court of Right, No US Judge, only referee, 12 Jurors (no US citizens), no representative licensed attorney participation, only counsel. Wrongdoer must appear, or suffer default judgment, 🙂 me, 🙁 you.

Emailed 10:00 am 5/17/2016 to Todd Schmaderer Office.

[[ 6-13-2015, 26 days later – Todd Schmaderer did acknowledge that he got my email but he has presently refused to give any answer to any question asked in this letter. I will start may common law court action for damages in a week if he does not respond to determine a fair settlement.]]

>>>>

Automobile Tow Issue