Client Notice

Posted: 3rd July 2017 by admin in Facebook

To all Clients: If you are missing any products in our ‘Shared Dropbox‘, or believe they may not be ‘updated, email me

and we will refresh the account to assure you have the latest versions of your ordered products. To follow only “my” law

postings send me an invite to (CLICK>) “Paul Severe” by Facebook.

Repealing the 2nd Amendment, say what???

Posted: 19th May 2018 by admin in 2nd Amendment

Powerful Gun Speech

The most articulate gun speech I've ever heard. Everyone needs to hear this. Make this go viral.Bill Whittle is the speaker in the video.https://www.facebook.com/billwhittle/

Posted by Daily Mentions on Wednesday, February 14, 2018

Repealing the 2nd Amendment, say what???

First the 10 individual amendments that were selected as part of the ‘Bill of Rights’ (i.e. 10 Amendments of 1791) are not written ‘law’, they are enumerated, unalienable ‘rights’.

Congress cannot, as is true with all men, take a right from another man, except for criminal punishment, on American soil.

Congress has no authority to take the ‘right to bear arms’, from any man, period, for such is unconstitutional. Simply put congress was never constituted with that authority by the American People.

Now if all congress would vote to remove any right such act would have no effect on that right, legally or constitutionally.

All 10 of the ‘Bill of Rights’ have existed for mankind from the beginning and will be until the end.

So what can a congress on American soil legislate?

They can only legislate the intent of their given constituted authority, which is military necessity/purpose, which naturally is inseparable from all nations.

So as to ‘the right to bear arms’ can only be restricted, governed, altered, in military purposed land*.

The United States can only own land for military purpose.

The United States must part with land that is not utilized for a military purpose within 5 years* of taking possession of such land.

An American has no right to carry anything in any military purposed land.

An American has no right to even be in military purposed land.

Any man in military purposed land can only have permission to be in such land.

The ‘Bill of Rights’ does not operate in military purposed lands.

Approximately 24% of America is military purposed land (land owned by ‘The United States of America’).

Approximately 76% of America is non-military purposed land (land not owned by ‘The United States of America’).

Congress governs arms on the 24%.

American People, by American common law, governs arms on the 76%.

If you are in a US court and the charged activity occurred in land not evidenced as of the 24%, you are in the wrong court.

Three things that are paramount in court: 1. territorial jurisdiction, 2. territorial jurisdiction, and lastly 3. territorial jurisdiction.

Utilize the ‘American Common Law Court’ (7th Amendment/right).

Contact Lawyer-Hansen for the document procedure to ‘challenge’ territorial jurisdiction, with estoppel. freeinhabitant.info.

((Land* = Space – one is not on land, one is in land, in a space. In, within, land. To be on a space is to be not within the space. The US courts will use this legal trickery to secure faulty territorial jurisdiction determinations. The Alice in Wonderland = Wonderspace.))

GOVERNMENT CODE, TITLE 10. GENERAL GOVERNMENT, SUBTITLE E. GOVERNMENT PROPERTY CHAPTER 2204. ACQUISITION OF LAND FOR STATE AND FEDERAL PURPOSES, SUBCHAPTER A. ACQUISITION OF LAND BY STATE, Sec. 2204.304. REVERSION TO STATE ON NONUSE. A grant under this subchapter must contain a reservation providing that if any part of the property granted ceases to be used for the purposes set out in Section 2204.301 for a continuous period of five years*, that part shall immediately and automatically revert to this state at the end of that period.

P.S. – Attorneys of the ‘BAR ASSOCIATION‘ that utilize such challenges get barred from association. Most attorneys, and congressmen, that understand this are privileged traitors.

INTRO

Posted: 13th April 2018 by admin in INTRO

INTRO:                  (Click on the COLORED below for link access.)

  1. pauljjhansen.com, a general compilation of primarily law information, with the main goal is to instruction how to live unrestrained by the tyrannical UNITED STATS, and its states.
  2. freeinhabitant.info, much the same as the above, more geared to providing specific instructions in warding off various state intervention.
  3. Paul Sever Briefing, Facebook, is a periodical posting of concise law brief points, with links to expanded information. Recommended for the serious-minded patriot. This facebook page is only for postings and not for reciprocal face-booking.
  4. https://uberxo.com/2017/08/02/uberxo-compaulseverefacebookpostings/  –  A list of all ‘Paul Sever Briefing’ posts, in chronological order, with searchable category capacity.
  5. Paul John Hansen, Facebook, Hansen’s general Facebook page.
  6. uberxo.com is a site, managed by Hansen, that allows for users, like you, to post info associated with any freedom movement for only pennies per month.

Administrative Process (AP) = (Non-Judicial request for remedy, INFO, Declaration of ‘state compelling interest’, notice of trespass, and gives notice of law at the same time.) Notary Presentment.

AP is a process that is respected in all US statutory courts , and American common law courts.

It is a tool that forces an answer from any man that may be making a claim on America soil.

The Petitioner (you) send, with aid of notary (me), by certified mailing, to the Respondent (them), clearly, precisely, written negative and positive averments*, and Admissions.

Respondent must reply by sworn affidavit to each point.

If no response is made the facts shall be deemed, as true, as stated, as written, by Petitioner, as evidence for use in any court in America.

See M1S-65 at Click> HERE.

As a lawyer I believe this is by far the most important tool to force any man, or any government agent, to full transparency. Most US, and state written laws, are unconstitutionally applied because government agents are almost never compelled in a state court to give full disclosure to all the elements of written law they are attempting to enforce. I have had four high level officers of US government resign from their job when I served this AP upon them, for once they are duly noticed they are now personally liable for all acts outside of the scope of the written law they are utilizing. This includes all US administrators (statism, state-ist, judges).

 

a·ver·ment*, noun, 1. an affirmation or allegation. 2, a formal statement by a party in a case of a fact or circumstance that the party offers to prove or substantiate.

Notary, Full Presentment Services

Posted: 27th June 2017 by admin in Notary Service

NOTARY COMMISSION No. 804917, STATE OF IOWA —

If you need proof of service.

If you are out of state, or in state, PDF me a copy of the signed documents and I’ll mail them as a NOTARY OF THE STATE (An Officer of the Court), this serves as legal service in all jurisdictions in America Common Law courts, and also in all US courts.

Administrative Process with Notary Presentment can be a tremendous tool to force any man, state or private, to provide evidence for you to win a judgment, that you generally can not get in a US court environment in many cases.

See M1S-65 (MS10065) at > CLICK HERE.

I can generally do it at a very low cost, mostly because it needs to be done, much of America’s liberties depends on this.

Paul John Hansen – pauljjhansenLAW@gmail.com

We need able men across the country who are willing to provide godly aid for jury determinations in Common Law proceedings.

If the Lord would so lead you to commit contact the court clerks office at >        courtclerk107@gmail.com

This court will utilize the internet to provide due process for each participant. The safest adjudicating hands on earth are of those of a Christian based jury.

Federal* Supreme Court, of the People,   (< styled name.)

Common Law Venue; Original and Exclusive Jurisdiction,

A superior court sitting with the power of a circuit, in ‘United States of America’*,

in and of de jure counties.

Court record of – ‘Independent Jural Society Community Court’.

(This court is fully validated with US court rulings, and thousands of years of operation. Come and see how attorneys use this court to get justice that is often not available in US statutory courts.)

– 7th Amendment, Bill of Rights, US Constitution – “In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.”

– NW Ordinance 1787, Art. 2 “… Trial by Jury, and of judicial proceedings according to the course of the Common Law.”

– (a) Saving to suitors, in all cases, the Right to a Common Law Remedy, where the Common Law is competent to give it;

– Christian Law and Common Law is synonymous” – Strauss v. Strauss, 3 So. 2nd 772 at 728 (1941).

– “the Law of the Land” means “the Common Law“. – State v. Simmon, 2 Spears 761, at 767 (1884).

 

Terms Defined:

United States of America‘* – proper noun. A country, a people, occupying most of the southern half of North America and including also Alaska and the Hawaiian Islands.

federal*, adjective – having or relating to a system of government in which several states, man, form a unity, for a specific purpose, but remain independent in general.

“Sovereignty” can, may, be a trick term.

Posted: 10th April 2017 by admin in Sovereignty

((Hansen comments.))

Sovereignty was first recognized by the high Court in this case.

 

CHISHOLM, Ex’r. versus GEORGIA. 

 

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED

STATES, 2 U.S. 419; 1 L. Ed. 440; 1793 U.S.

LEXIS 249; 2 Dall. 419

 

To the Constitution of the United States the term

SOVEREIGN, is totally unknown. There is but one place

where it could have been used with propriety. But, even in

that place it would not, perhaps, have comported with the

delicacy of those, who ordained [***86] and established

that Constitution.  They might have announced themselves

“SOVEREIGN” people of the United States: But serenely

conscious of the fact, they avoided the ostentatious

declaration.”

((No man as to his being associated with the fiction ‘United States’ remains sovereign as to that relationship, he too becomes a legal person (fiction), at parity, but yet his sovereignty remains on his private side.))

 

“As the State has claimed precedence of the people; so, in

the same inverted course of things, the Government has

often claimed precedence of the State; and to this

perversion in the Second degree, many of the volumes of

confusion concerning sovereignty owe their existence.”

 

((State precedence can only be over the ‘person’ (the fiction) (contracted terms), never over the man, for such can not waive any right, or yield precedence to another.))

 

Sovereignty was defined and those who are sovereign were identified by this case; and, it is the standing law on sovereignty today.

 

 Supreme Court in DRED SCOTT v. JOHN F. A. SANDFORD, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), where the High Court stated, in relevant part:

      @ 404

            “…The words “people of the United States” and “citizens” are

synonymous terms, and mean the same thing. They both describe the political

body who, according to our republican institutions, form the sovereignty,

and who hold the power and conduct the Government through their

representatives. They are what we familiarly call the sovereign people’, and

every citizen is one of this people, and a constituent member of this

sovereignty…”

((Sovereignty only in the institution (government), that only goes to consent to being governed, one that has not consented is not a party to this institution.))

 

 

 

It is true, every person, and every class and description of persons, who were

at the time of the adoption of the Constitution recognized as citizens in

the several States, became also citizens of this new political body; but none

other; it was formed by them, and for them and their posteritybut for no one

else.  And the personal rights and privileges guarantied to citizens of this new

sovereignty were intended to embrace those only who were then members

of the several State communities, or who should afterwards by

birthright or otherwise become members, according to the provisions

of the Constitution and the principles on which it was founded.” (emphasis

added) Scott v. Sanford, 60 U.S. 393, at 406.

((I want independence from any state to which I have not, upon full disclosure, consented to association, contract. The above is bad if it is a state not compliant to your wishes, good if it is. All such states today are not of my wish today. I wish not associate, contract.))

 

 

Even the States recognize this sovereignty.

 

R. W. Kemper v. The State,

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

63 Tex. Crim. 1; 138 S.W. 1025; 1911 Tex. Crim. App.

LEXIS 365

 

The rule in America is that the American people are the

sovereign, and in them is lodged all power, and the agencies of

government possess no authority save that which is delegated

to them by the people…”.  Also, see Perry v. United States,

294 US 330, 353 (1935), “The Congress as the instrumentality

of **sovereignty is endowed with certain powers to be exerted on

behalf of the people in the manner and with the effect the

Constitution ordains.  The Congress cannot invoke the

sovereign power of the people to override their will as thus

declared.”

 

((America is not the same as United States, the first is a nation, the second, a tool of that nation.))

((This **sovereignty is in house, not to be confused with the people not of that house.))

 

((I conclude that I wish independence of these body politics. They look good on the surface, but all are addressing those that consent to be governed by them.))

Another One Bites The Dust, 13K$ Credit Card Victory

I have won every credit card case I have ever been involved with in the last 1o years.

BRANCH BANKING & TRUST CO.       Bladen County, North Carolina

My client had a $13,581.33 claimed outstanding credit card bill due to the above bank.

We challenged all the elements of evidence of a true loan of substantive funds.

The bank folded and dismissed the court case.

Banks are limited, by congress, to only lending “true” designated funds, they use to do this, now seldom do it.

The result is massive profits for the bank, and massive inflation for your community.

Take responsible banking and sound money back for you and your community, most every extension of credit by banks today are not compliant with congressional law, or biblical law.

This is why your savings are not worth saving.

This is crime to the trillionth degree.

Crime that is robing your local community of millions of dollars every year.

Hire me, I can generally cancel you outstanding credit balances, that is due, with any bank in America.

10.01 Dismissal (1)
10.00 Dismissal (1)

Where-Is-My-VIN-Car-Covers-Direct

State” officers treat “vehicles” in their system as “state” property with a “state” legal interest.

Remove the evidence of a “state” interest and you are generally left alone. If not you can sue for damages.

How to remove you *VIN from the state Department of Vehicles Registration system.

Yes you can follow a process that takes the present VIN out of the state system.

This removes all association, assumed contract with the state, away from your now private property.

After this removal you can re-“record” (for a public record) it in our internet site for private “Record of Owners” where proof of ownership is further assured.

At all times during recreational travel:

  1. Carry a certified copy of the full title.
  2. Carry a certified copy of a notarized bill of sale.
  3. Carry a notarized personal I.D.
  4. Carry a certified copy of the dis-registration documents.
  5. Carry a short brief on right to travel and to own property independant of any state of the United States.
  6. Carry a shortened URL link for easy access to the location of the “record” of present owner.
  7. Carry certified copy of correspondence with the local state Governor of you independant “record”.
  8. Have a NOT FOR HIRE plate with ownership contact info in the back window and where plates are generally displayed in your local state. (I put one in the back window because the cops like to tear my plate off occasionally.

With your 15$ payment for the M1S-56 Package you will have step by step instructions of how to perfect the removal, and you will also have perpetual use of the “Owner of Record” internet site to record your property, along with all the stories (good and bad) from others that are doing the same process across the nation.

Let us work together to perfect “right to travel”, as many are seeking such all across our land.

*VIN defined – ‘Vehicle Identification Number’ in U.S. state jurisdiction, and ‘*Chassis  Number’ in mans jurisdiction.

*chas·sis, noun
  1. the base frame of a motor vehicle or other wheeled conveyance.
    synonyms: framework, frame, structure, substructure, shell, casing

    “the chassis of the car is in mint condition”
  • Had a car towed.
  • Did the city claim that you must pay for a hearing before you can stop a taking of a property by a city municipality by demolition.

5th Amendment – “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”
14th Amendment – “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”

and – 1787, the Continental Congress adopted the Northwest Ordinance for governance of areas in the United States outside of the individual states. Congress wrote: “No man shall be deprived of his liberty or property, but by the judgment of his peers, or the law of the land.”[16]

((Due process is – notice and opportunity to be heard in a court that provided “meaningful time” and “meaningful access” for your presentment of the facts, to an impartial judge, or judge(s), (jury). What is due you can not be charged for, it must be at no cost. And this hearing is to be done before the taking, not) after.))

Pay a little counsel time and I’ll show how to turn up the heat on tow companies, impound lots, and city municipality code enforcement NAZIS.