We need able men across the country who are willing to provide godly aid for jury determinations in Common Law proceedings.

If the Lord would so lead you to commit contact the court clerks office at >        courtclerk107@gmail.com

This court will utilize the internet to provide due process for each participant. The safest adjudicating hands on earth are of those of a Christian based jury.

Federal* Supreme Court, of the People,   (< styled name.)

Common Law Venue; Original and Exclusive Jurisdiction,

A superior court sitting with the power of a circuit, in ‘United States of America’*,

in and of de jure counties.

Court record of – ‘Independent Jural Society Community Court’.

(This court is fully validated with US court rulings, and thousands of years of operation. Come and see how attorneys use this court to get justice that is often not available in US statutory courts.)

– 7th Amendment, Bill of Rights, US Constitution – “In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.”

– NW Ordinance 1787, Art. 2 “… Trial by Jury, and of judicial proceedings according to the course of the Common Law.”

– (a) Saving to suitors, in all cases, the Right to a Common Law Remedy, where the Common Law is competent to give it;

– Christian Law and Common Law is synonymous” – Strauss v. Strauss, 3 So. 2nd 772 at 728 (1941).

– “the Law of the Land” means “the Common Law“. – State v. Simmon, 2 Spears 761, at 767 (1884).


Terms Defined:

United States of America‘* – proper noun. A country, a people, occupying most of the southern half of North America and including also Alaska and the Hawaiian Islands.

federal*, adjective – having or relating to a system of government in which several states, man, form a unity, for a specific purpose, but remain independent in general.

“Sovereignty” can, may, be a trick term.

Posted: 10th April 2017 by admin in Sovereignty

((Hansen comments.))

Sovereignty was first recognized by the high Court in this case.


CHISHOLM, Ex’r. versus GEORGIA. 



STATES, 2 U.S. 419; 1 L. Ed. 440; 1793 U.S.

LEXIS 249; 2 Dall. 419


To the Constitution of the United States the term

SOVEREIGN, is totally unknown. There is but one place

where it could have been used with propriety. But, even in

that place it would not, perhaps, have comported with the

delicacy of those, who ordained [***86] and established

that Constitution.  They might have announced themselves

“SOVEREIGN” people of the United States: But serenely

conscious of the fact, they avoided the ostentatious


((No man as to his being associated with the fiction ‘United States’ remains sovereign as to that relationship, he too becomes a legal person (fiction), at parity, but yet his sovereignty remains on his private side.))


“As the State has claimed precedence of the people; so, in

the same inverted course of things, the Government has

often claimed precedence of the State; and to this

perversion in the Second degree, many of the volumes of

confusion concerning sovereignty owe their existence.”


((State precedence can only be over the ‘person’ (the fiction) (contracted terms), never over the man, for such can not waive any right, or yield precedence to another.))


Sovereignty was defined and those who are sovereign were identified by this case; and, it is the standing law on sovereignty today.


 Supreme Court in DRED SCOTT v. JOHN F. A. SANDFORD, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), where the High Court stated, in relevant part:

      @ 404

            “…The words “people of the United States” and “citizens” are

synonymous terms, and mean the same thing. They both describe the political

body who, according to our republican institutions, form the sovereignty,

and who hold the power and conduct the Government through their

representatives. They are what we familiarly call the sovereign people’, and

every citizen is one of this people, and a constituent member of this


((Sovereignty only in the institution (government), that only goes to consent to being governed, one that has not consented is not a party to this institution.))




It is true, every person, and every class and description of persons, who were

at the time of the adoption of the Constitution recognized as citizens in

the several States, became also citizens of this new political body; but none

other; it was formed by them, and for them and their posteritybut for no one

else.  And the personal rights and privileges guarantied to citizens of this new

sovereignty were intended to embrace those only who were then members

of the several State communities, or who should afterwards by

birthright or otherwise become members, according to the provisions

of the Constitution and the principles on which it was founded.” (emphasis

added) Scott v. Sanford, 60 U.S. 393, at 406.

((I want independence from any state to which I have not, upon full disclosure, consented to association, contract. The above is bad if it is a state not compliant to your wishes, good if it is. All such states today are not of my wish today. I wish not associate, contract.))



Even the States recognize this sovereignty.


R. W. Kemper v. The State,


63 Tex. Crim. 1; 138 S.W. 1025; 1911 Tex. Crim. App.



The rule in America is that the American people are the

sovereign, and in them is lodged all power, and the agencies of

government possess no authority save that which is delegated

to them by the people…”.  Also, see Perry v. United States,

294 US 330, 353 (1935), “The Congress as the instrumentality

of **sovereignty is endowed with certain powers to be exerted on

behalf of the people in the manner and with the effect the

Constitution ordains.  The Congress cannot invoke the

sovereign power of the people to override their will as thus



((America is not the same as United States, the first is a nation, the second, a tool of that nation.))

((This **sovereignty is in house, not to be confused with the people not of that house.))


((I conclude that I wish independence of these body politics. They look good on the surface, but all are addressing those that consent to be governed by them.))

Another One Bites The Dust, 13K$ Credit Card Victory

I have won every credit card case I have ever been involved with in the last 1o years.

BRANCH BANKING & TRUST CO.       Bladen County, North Carolina

My client had a $13,581.33 claimed outstanding credit card bill due to the above bank.

We challenged all the elements of evidence of a true loan of substantive funds.

The bank folded and dismissed the court case.

Banks are limited, by congress, to only lending “true” designated funds, they use to do this, now seldom do it.

The result is massive profits for the bank, and massive inflation for your community.

Take responsible banking and sound money back for you and your community, most every extension of credit by banks today are not compliant with congressional law, or biblical law.

This is why your savings are not worth saving.

This is crime to the trillionth degree.

Crime that is robing your local community of millions of dollars every year.

Hire me, I can generally cancel you outstanding credit balances, that is due, with any bank in America.

10.01 Dismissal (1)
10.00 Dismissal (1)


State” officers treat “vehicles” in their system as “state” property with a “state” legal interest.

Remove the evidence of a “state” interest and you are generally left alone. If not you can sue for damages.

How to remove you *VIN from the state Department of Vehicles Registration system.

Yes you can follow a process that takes the present VIN out of the state system.

This removes all association, assumed contract with the state, away from your now private property.

After this removal you can re-“record” (for a public record) it in our internet site for private “Record of Owners” where proof of ownership is further assured.

At all times during recreational travel:

  1. Carry a certified copy of the full title.
  2. Carry a certified copy of a notarized bill of sale.
  3. Carry a notarized personal I.D.
  4. Carry a certified copy of the dis-registration documents.
  5. Carry a short brief on right to travel and to own property independant of any state of the United States.
  6. Carry a shortened URL link for easy access to the location of the “record” of present owner.
  7. Carry certified copy of correspondence with the local state Governor of you independant “record”.
  8. Have a NOT FOR HIRE plate with ownership contact info in the back window and where plates are generally displayed in your local state. (I put one in the back window because the cops like to tear my plate off occasionally.

With your 15$ payment for the M1S-56 Package you will have step by step instructions of how to perfect the removal, and you will also have perpetual use of the “Owner of Record” internet site to record your property, along with all the stories (good and bad) from others that are doing the same process across the nation.

Let us work together to perfect “right to travel”, as many are seeking such all across our land.

*VIN defined – ‘Vehicle Identification Number’ in U.S. state jurisdiction, and ‘*Chassis  Number’ in mans jurisdiction.

*chas·sis, noun
  1. the base frame of a motor vehicle or other wheeled conveyance.
    synonyms: framework, frame, structure, substructure, shell, casing

    “the chassis of the car is in mint condition”
  • Had a car towed.
  • Did the city claim that you must pay for a hearing before you can stop a taking of a property by a city municipality by demolition.

5th Amendment – “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”
14th Amendment – “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”

and – 1787, the Continental Congress adopted the Northwest Ordinance for governance of areas in the United States outside of the individual states. Congress wrote: “No man shall be deprived of his liberty or property, but by the judgment of his peers, or the law of the land.”[16]

((Due process is – notice and opportunity to be heard in a court that provided “meaningful time” and “meaningful access” for your presentment of the facts, to an impartial judge, or judge(s), (jury). What is due you can not be charged for, it must be at no cost. And this hearing is to be done before the taking, not) after.))

Pay a little counsel time and I’ll show how to turn up the heat on tow companies, impound lots, and city municipality code enforcement NAZIS.

M1S-55, Senator gives written notice that ‘Auto Registration’ and ‘Driver License’ is a contract that can be rescinded, 5$.

Wayne Stump, State Senator, sends notarized notice to Arizona Department of Public Safety, noticing them that they need to inform the policing agents of the contractual aspects of the Automobile Registration and State Drivers License, with attention of how some have formally rescinded such contracts.

This package contains the full letter, with a 14 minute audio from the man that was able to acquire a copy of the notarized notice.

I recommend that you send the same to your senator and ask for a similar disclosure response, with instructions of how one contracts, and how one rescinds such contracts with the state.

With your payment you will have perpetual access to these correspondences, and the success of the rescinding process.

Please send me a copy of the letter you sent in, and a copy of the responses that you got back if any, and I’ll post them for all to learn of how to successfully cancel these godless contracts. Feel free to black out persona; information.

Omaha, Nebraska, pastor going down.

This girl is a client of mine, we are prosecuting a case against this man, if you have info that can help contact the site email address.

uberXO.com/stop rape


Three words that seven people, that is seven out of twelve on a common law jury, yep those three little words that terrorize corrupt officials are –

“It ain’t right!”

That’s it, all US agents fear the common jury, the more independent they are from statism the more they fear them, they fear any court that they do not have the protection of a “state” judge covering for them, they do not ever want to be questioned as to “what written law did you rely upon to have authority to …………….”.

The common law jury is entirely different than a legislative governed jury, one is of the people, the other of the state, one is an independent tribunal, the other an advisory, administrative aiding, tribunal.

The People are the highest authority of the land under God,

the other merely participates with the state authorities, and only has authority where the People gave it, which is not much.

'I'm screwed.'

Stay off their land, stay away from all contact (contract) with the US, challenge the rule of full disclosure on all implied contracts (state drivers license, property registration, for example. Stay with the People and the protection of their/your court.

In US courts, liken to the above cartoon, the judge is of the US, the grand jury, prosecutor, and trial jurors, court reporter, even the major newspapers, are all of the US (statists),  you are greatly disadvantaged.


Click on – M1Sp48       (Pay the 5$ to stay abreast to the many common law cases that we will be running and to support the work of many keeping common law accessible to the People of America.)

Click on – Sueing Nebraska Governor

The “law of the land” is your land, and is what the jury says it is.

In the year of 1676 West New Jersey code of law for the ‘free inhabitant” was/is:

“…and that no Proprietor, freeholder or inhabitant in the said Province, shall be deprived or condemned of life, limb, ,liberty, estate, property or any ways hurt in his or their privileges, freedoms or franchises, upon any account whatsoever, without a due trial. and judgment passed by twelve good and lawful men of his neighborhood first hand.”

Now this is 100 years before the Declaration of Independence of 1776.






Posted: 16th September 2016 by admin in Sovereignty


In A.D. 1793, the Supreme Court declared in Chisholm vs Georgia that the American people were “sovereigns without subjects”.

Calif Gov’t Code 54950
…The people of this State do not yield their sovereignty to the
agencies which serve them.


How to Police Your Community

Posted: 5th September 2016 by admin in Sheriff

How to Police Your Community

Recently there has been a great upsurge of concern of police abuse, as well as expansion concerns.
Much of that abuse has been going on for years, the phone camera has brought much of it to your living-room.
The police are often times no longer a community member, they are more of a SWAT team that’s eager to swat whatever moves.
After twenty five (25) years of studying law there are few things so solidified with me then the fact that “police”, as we know them, are not “our” officers, but rather officers of the “CITY”.
POLICE are OFFICERS, “police = policy” / official = enforcer.
They owe their life to the COMPANY, and guess what you are not that company.
So what are the police in a nutshell, they are people, that have accepted employment, for a wage, to enforce policies, on a specific area of land, that land being owned by their employer, the CITY.
All authority of entities in America come through written permission. First the people have authority by grant of God, in America some of that authority is then delegated to what we call the UNITED STATES, which is an extension of the Confederacy between the States (not the People). The UNITED STATES then delegates authority to it’s agents (employees), to apply it’s written laws administratively upon that same land, which we call “state” jurisdictions, which are further divided into various county areas, and again into “chartered” cities. All the above are divided generally into two jurisdictions, the first being the people (common law), and all the rest being administration legislation ( proprietary governance). In America close to 24% is land governed by this US entity, and the remaining balance of land, 76% being under the said common law of the people.
So you ask how much land does this include, I’ll just use Omaha Nebraska for an example. Well the answer is close to no land, you see the CITY only owns a small percentage of land in what we “call” the city. To find out if the CITY owns a specific piece of the land just go to the COUNTY ASSESSORS of any given jurisdiction and they can quickly tell you the owner’s name and contact address.
Well doesn’t the CITY own all the streets? NO. They own close to none of the streets. One judge tried to convince me that the roads have been abandoned and the city has taken over the care of them. Good try MR, but I need more proof than that.
Think about it, your family has parked your car in front of your house, and used that land since roads were invented and they claim it is theirs, ya right, they may even think they own your house also.
Well if they do not own it then who does? Well the answer is simple, it is “he” who has proof of a deed, and the CITY is not one of those “he’s”.
Well if the CITY does not own it, and we, “the people”, own it, who then has “policy” enforcement on that land?
The answer is the owner, and that owner, in America has property rights, one of those property right is “open roads” to give value to your own property. Property that has limited, or no access, is close to worthless.
In America such land is under “Common Law”, which is simply the law of the community, now the law of the community is what the jury of twelve say it is when needed, and hopefully seven of the twelve are in-tune with God’s Law, to give a just order for all.
Yep, each community is self governed by revolving juries, not by police with revolvers.
Stand up, take a moment to learn the truth, it is not all that complicated, if a CITY officer tries to govern you force him to prove territorial jurisdiction, if he can not sue him for pretending to have official authority on land his employer does not own.
If cops act up in your community make a community arrest, get his name, summons him to a common law ‘court of record’, and let the chips fall where they may.
I started talking of this in Omaha Nebraska courts and soon after the CITY OF OMAHA police chief told every officer to get their house out of their name so that it can not be taken by a civil action, then I was told, by deputy sheriffs of the area, that the top two prosecutors resigned from their jobs (totaling 32 years). All this because I started summonsing them to court, I was told that I would be killed if I do not back off. See more at freeinhabitant.info, pauljjhansen.com.
Next time a cop treats you unjustly, or tries to extort money from you without cause just smile and ask if he has a nice house, and then say I like nice houses.
Local communities belong to the people, people in America are to be governed by common law.
This is what many believe is a biblical blueprint for such a community:
1. People who wish to unite an organized community jurisdictions that only include land owned by those same people who unite.
2. Those same people hire (elect) a sheriff.
3. The sheriff then aids the people in applying God’s written laws upon that same land.
4. When needed the sheriff can deputize able men from that same united community to aid in the said enforcement of God law.
5. The jury of twelve men, well equipped in biblical law, is then periodically convened, when needed, to determine the remedy for all damages done by individuals on that same land.

Acts on US land are subject to US courts.
Acts done on the People’s land, are subject to the People’s court’s (common law).
Any act, by any man, to take the authority of the People away from the People is tyranny.
Start stopping tyranny now in your community.

Paul John Hansen 9-3-2016