[ City of Omaha, NE, Police and Inspector said they would tow it on 11-11-2011, it is now 12-12-2011, 30+ days, I see them drive by and slow down and look at it, but they stay away.  Sound legal argument may be working at last.  I am now going back and suing them for all the past violations as with towing. ]

To: Director, Planning Department, Attn: Administrative Board of Appeals, 1819 Farnam Street, Room 1110, Omaha, NE 68183.  –and-  Mayor of the CITY OF OMAHA, Jim Suttel. 1819 Farnam Street, Suite 300, Omaha, NE 68183.

From: Paul john Hansen, a Article IV (4) free inhabitant.

NOTICE / VIOLATION / AFFIDAVIT / BRIEF

NOTICE to Mayor is NOTICE to all CITY OF OMAHA Employees.

COMES NOW, Paul John Hansen, by right as an “free inhabitant” pursuant to Article 4 of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777.  See attached Affidavit.

NOTICE- No right can be taxed, therefore no “Appeal / Notice” on my part can be barred by lack of payment, and must be received as NOTICE of your error as described below.

On the date of October 12, 2011, an Officer with Serial Number of 1340, name not being legible, did attach, to the rear window, a “NOTICE OF NUISANCE” on my Automobile that was/is parked on my private property, not on any easement way (Street) as associated with the same property.

Claiming it is subject to tow for Lacking:

a.  Current Nebraska license plates,

b.  not in Operational “street legal” condition,

c.  Not parked on paved driveway.

d. 10 days Notice- if not corrected is subject to impound, and possible criminal citation.  Listed Intended Tow date 11/11-2011 if not complied with.

Automobile being described as White Mazda RX-7.

Parked on the south side of my property (house) on a paved driveway with the west 10 feet being a paved brick drive (parking pad).

Unlicensed, unregistered, 100% working order.

The Land that the subject Automobile is on is as follows:

Legal description- As originally surveyed by the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / UNITED STATES-   Section 15, Township15, Range 13, North West Quarter of Section 15, subdivided as SMITHS- LOT 4, Block 17 ½ VAC ALLEY ADJ & S 33 FT LT 3 & N 17 FT LT 4 BLK 17, all being without the UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES INC.

The subject land has no evidence as being owned by the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, pursuant to Article I. “The stile of this confederacy shall be, “The United States of America.” As found in the Constitution- Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777.

And therefore is not of the UNITED STATES INC., pursuant to 28 U.S.C. PART VI CHAPTER 176 SUBCHAPTER A § 3002(14) (15)(A).

And therefore not within the “exclusive Legislation.. Authority” pursuant to Article I, Section 8, (par.17) UNITED STATES Const. September 17, 1787.

And therefore not within the DISTRICT as numbered as “107. Nebraska.” Pursuant to Title 28 UNITED STATES CODE CHAPTER 5 – DISTRICT, as defined as a possession of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.  Therefore the subject Land is not evidenced as land under proprietary governance by the said USA, and it’s UNITED STATE INC. written laws.

And all my, Paul John Hansen’s, private land being protected as independent by evidence of the above listed “supreme Law of the Land” pursuant to the UNITED STATES Const. September 17, 1787 – Article VI , par. 2, of which all employees of the UNITED STATES INC. are subject.

That just as in the CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE 3,  STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SEC. 1.  “The State of California is an inseparable part of the

United States of America, and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land.”  So it is also as pertaining to the STATE OF NEBRASKA.

Being that the CITY OF OMAHA and its Omaha Municipal Code, Section 18-42 and 18-43 is a written law pursuant to its relationship with the STATE OF NEBRASKA, it therefore is subject to the limitations granted it by the said UNITED STATES Constitution.

Therefore being that the CITY OF OMAHA can not produce evidence that the subject described Land (Hansen’s Land) is not owned by the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (or its subdivisions) all subject listed acts against such Land are lacking power of written law and are null and void.

Therefore all acts, done by the CITY OF OMAHA, are in violation of it’s respective charter and are hereby noticed as acts in violation of “acting outside of its limited authority” and therefore damaging, oppressing, attempting to plunder without authority.

If notice is not sent to me before the date of 11-5-2011 that you have ceased from your intent to tow, I assess you the equivalent of seventeen (17) percent of one once of gold per day until I can safely keep the listed property, at the listed location, in the same listed condition, by written declaration from an officer of the CITY OF OMAHA.

Any person acting without authority derived by written law, under color of law, as to the UNITED STATE INC. is personally liable. SEE ink signed Affidavit as hereto attached.

Any UNITED STATES licensed attorney acting outside of the UNITED STATES is in violation of the same.

I will need the name of the person that authorized the towing of my / the subject Automobile upon the rejection of my position as found in the brief above.

**Upon notice, ignorance of the law can not be claimed.

______________________

Paul John Hansen

1548 N 19 Street, Omaha, Nebraska,

without the UNITED STATES, not a resident address.


Video Record / Proof of Mailing

    That on the 14 day of the 10th month of 2011, at ___:___ o’clock am – pm, the signed, did mail, by US First Class, post-paid, to the above addressed individual(s), an envelop, by digitally recording, in video, the same, and all of its contents, as written above, with supporting 2 page affidavit, 5 pages total, being sealed, and deposited in an un-retrievable United States Postal Service Mail Box.

Video Title- __Mazda Tow Challenge / Notice__________________________________.

 

Blue ink signature-______________________ Paul John Hansen

AFFIDAVIT

in support of the attached NOTICE / VIOLATION / AFFIDAVIT / Brief

1. That herein after Affiant shall mean the man Paul John Hansen.

2. That Affiant is 21 years of age or older.

3. That Affiant is a “free inhabitant” pursuant to Article 4 of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777.

4. That Affiant mailed this document and the attached NOTICE / VIOLATION  / Brief on the ____ day of October 2011 to the Director, Planning Department, Attn: Administrative Board of Appeals, 1819 Farnam Street, Room 1110, Omaha, NE 68183, by post paid UNITED STATES Postal Service, first class, with retaining a digital recording of the same.

5. That on the date of October 12, 2011, an Officer with Serial Number of 1340, name not being legible, did attach, to the rear window, a “NOTICE OF NUISANCE” on my Automobile that was/is parked on my private property, not on any easement way (Street) as associated with the same property, addressed as 1548 N 19, Omaha, Nebraska, without the UNITED STATES.  See copy hereto attached as EXHIBIT “AA”..

6. That the subject Automobile was parked on the south side of my property (house) on a paved driveway with the west 10 feet being a paved brick drive (parking pad).

7. That the Automobile is unlicensed, unregistered with the STATE OF NEBRASKA, and in 100% working order.

8. That the subject Land that the subject Automobile is on is as follows:

Legal description- As originally surveyed by the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / UNITED STATES-   Section 15, Township15, Range 13, North West Quarter of Section 15, subdivided as SMITHS- LOT 4, Block 17 ½ VAC ALLEY ADJ & S 33 FT LT 3 & N 17 FT LT 4 BLK 17, all being without the UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES INC.

9. The subject land has no evidence as being owned by the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, pursuant to Article I. “The stile of this confederacy shall be, “The United States of America.” As found in the Constitution- Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777.

10. That the subject Land is not of the UNITED STATES INC., pursuant to 28 U.S.C. PART VI CHAPTER 176 SUBCHAPTER A § 3002(14) (15)(A).

11. That the subject is not within the “exclusive Legislation.. Authority” pursuant to Article I, Section 8, (par.17) UNITED STATES Const. September 17, 1787.

12. That the subject Land is not within the DISTRICT as numbered as “107. Nebraska.” Pursuant to Title 28 UNITED STATES CODE CHAPTER 5 – DISTRICT, as defined as a possession of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

13. That the subject Land is not evidenced as land under proprietary governance by the said UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and it’s UNITED STATE INC. written laws.

14. That Affiant’s private Land being protected as independent by evidence of the above listed “supreme Law of the Land” pursuant to the UNITED STATES Const. September 17, 1787 – Article VI , par. 2, of which all employees of the UNITED STATES INC. are subject.

15. That just as in the CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE 3,  STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SEC. 1.  “The State of California is an inseparable part of the

United States of America, and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land.”  So it is also as pertaining to the STATE OF NEBRASKA.

16. That being the CITY OF OMAHA and its Omaha Municipal Code, Section 18-42 and 18-43 is a written law pursuant to its relationship with the STATE OF NEBRASKA, it therefore is subject to the limitations granted it by the said UNITED STATES Constitution.

17. That the CITY OF OMAHA can not produce evidence that the subject described Land (Hansen’s Land) is not owned by the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (or its subdivisions) all subject listed acts against such Land are lacking power of written law and are null and void.

18. That all acts, done by the CITY OF OMAHA, are in violation of it’s respective charter and are hereby noticed as acts in violation of “acting outside of its limited authority” and therefore damaging, oppressing, attempting to plunder this Affiant without authority.

19. That Affiant has noticed the CITY OF OMAHA- “if notice is not sent to me before the date of 11-5-2011 that you have ceased from your intent to tow, I assess you the equivalent of seventeen (17) percent of one once of gold per day until I can safely keep the listed property, at the listed location, in the same listed condition, by written declaration from an officer of the CITY OF OMAHA.

And-     Any person acting without authority derived by written law, under color of law, as to the UNITED STATE INC. is personally liable.

And-    Any UNITED STATES licensed attorney acting outside of the UNITED STATES is in violation of the same.

20. That Affiant has notified the CITY OF OMAHA that Affiant will need the name of the person that authorized the towing of the subject Automobile upon the rejection of Affiant’s position as found in the attached Brief and this Affidavit.

21. That no evidence exists that the subject Automobile is *owned by the STATE OF NEBRASKA, CITY OF OMAHA, or the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA or the UNITED STATE INC.

-State of Nebraska

-County of Douglas

The foregoing _2__ page Affidavit with blue ink signature, was acknowledged before me this 14 day of October 2011, by the man Paul John Hansen , who is personally known to me, and who has produced appropriate identification.   Also the above affidavit is executed *without the United States, I Paul John Hansen declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing affidavit is true and correct, as best of My knowledge. Executed on 14 day of the 10th month of 2011.

          Signature _____________________ , Paul John Jansen

 

_____________________________ Notary

Demand for Oath or Affirmation

Where applicable pursuant to the 4th Amendment as found in the UNITED STATES Constitution of September 17, 1787, and/or common law.

I Paul John Hansen, as a *free inhabitant, was given an indefeasible title to my land, as described as:   Section 15, Township15, Range 13, North West Quarter of Section 15, subdivided as SMITHS- LOT 4, Block 17 ½ VAC ALLEY ADJ & S 33 FT LT 3 & N 17 FT LT 4 BLK 17, all being without the UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES INC.

(mail addressed as – 1548 N 19, Omaha, Nebraska, without the UNITED STATES)

and I’m the lawful owner of the described land.

Therefore, if the CITY OF OMAHA is going to bring a claim against me or my property, you are commanded to put the complaint on a lawful affidavit, or there is no charge, and you will acknowledge that there is no charge and discharge it immediately! And to not do so would be considered warring with the Constitution and construed as Treason.

__________________________________

Paul John Hansen

 Subscribed and sworn to before me, this 14 day of October, 2011.

 

Notary Seal:                                                                               ______________________________________

Notary Public

* free inhabitant as found and utilized in article IV, Articles of Confederation 1777.

UNITED STATES CODE – TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 13 > § 242

Deprivation of rights under color of law

“Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.”

[[ I, Paul John Hansen, assuming that the above is a prohibition against the subject acts the CITY OF OMAHA intends to impose as related to the subject “towing” issue listed, for a US entity to act outside of it’s written law is naturally prohibited for the mere virtue of it has never being granted.

My choosing of independence from the UNITED STATES INC. is such a right.]]

*owner and owned- defined as right over the subject Land and Automobile and to use, enjoy, and dispose of.

If I am forced to move my property to hide it from your towing it will be damage.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.