TO: Robert Stinson, USA Attorney, Tallahassee, Suite 400, 111 N Adams St., Florida, 32301
CC TO: Attorney General, Pam Bondi, State of Florida, The Capitol PL-01, Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050
FROM: Paul John Hansen, Trustee, Counsel for Kent Hovind, 1548 N 19, Omaha, Nebraska, without the United States. 402-957-2853
RE: Notice of Violation of Written Law
The United States of America has claimed that Kent Hovind violated various US Codes, to which he received a ten+ year sentence by THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION, Case No.: 3:06cr83/MCR
This is a Notice of the violation of the acting Attorney(s) as to practicing law outside of their licensed jurisdiction, for a licensed attorney only has permission to practice law within the United States.
As there is no evidence, that the acts that Kent Hovind was accused of doing, occurred on land that was owned by the United States of America at the time of the alleged crime. Or the subject land as addressed hereafter is in the same said jurisdiction of the US court, USC.
All US written law have force derived from permission, as associated with proprietary right. All US written law is exclusively legislated for specific land, that being land owned by the United States of America and lacks such written permission to be enforced on land not owned by the United States of America. Said fact can not be altered or affected by any court, plaintiff, or defendant.
No sustainable evidence exist that supports that Kent Hovind is a type subject to any US written law when occupying land not owned by the United States of America.
All written laws have territorial limitations and the United States is no different from any other government in that respects (a jurisdictional component). You, as a/the USA Attorney MUST understand that statement because not only is this your job, you have taken an oath to uphold the written laws of the United States at all times. Your profession requires that you obey the written laws AND its limitations regardless of the implications that the truth may have on you.
You are licensed to practice law ONLY in the United States and this is something that you may have overlooked in the past, but you can no longer ignore because I am bringing it to your attention right here and right now.
What is relevant remains the fact that you are now informed that you are, have been, practicing law outside of the territorial jurisdiction of the United States and as such have been providing legal advice to your client / employer, to act outside of the United Sates, is a clear violation of the standards contained in the Rules of Professional Conduct of the Association from whom you derive your license to practice law.
“ Florida Rules of Professional Conduct
3 RULES OF DISCIPLINE
3-3 JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE RULES
RULE 3-3.1 SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA; DISCIPLINARY AGENCIES
“The exclusive jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of Florida over the discipline of persons admitted to the practice of law shall be administered in the following manner subject to the supervision and review of the court.
Rule 4-1.2 Scope of Representation
(d) Criminal or Fraudulent Conduct
Rule 4-5.5 Unauthorized Practice of Law
A lawyer shall not:
(a) practice law in a jurisdiction where doing so violates the regulation of the legal profession in that jurisdiction; or
(b) assist a person who is not a member of the bar in the performance of activity that constitutes the unlicensed practice of law. ”
Representing the United States of America, the Confederacy, interests is always important but your duty to obey all the written laws of the United States is paramount and demands truthfulness from you regardless of the requests of your client.
The Organic Laws of the United States of America are still positive law and the territorial limitations have been clearly explained and demonstrated in written law so you have no excuse for ignorance of that law. Ignorance of the law is no excuse for professional legal counsel in any case but you have now been informed by us/me in writing as to your violations of written law and my demand for your acknowledgement of the truth about the laws that bind you as an officer of the court and a licensed attorney. You permission is limited by written law, period. For you to prove otherwise is futile.
Inform your client of the truth and instruct them accordingly as the written laws of the United States and Rules of Professional Conduct dictate you do. This is to be done before June 22, 2011, for your involvement in the sale of two homes that rightfully remain a possession of two Trusts that I manage. The subject properties are addressed, by you as, 5720 North Palafox Highway, and, 5800 block North Old Palafox Street, both of Pensacola, Florida.
You have advised the United States of America and a United States Court to apply the US Code to land not subject to that written law, in conjunction where your license to practice law does not reach. Stop the damage now, correct this error immediately.
People such as Kent and Jo Hovind, as well as the said Trusts, that are domiciled outside of the land owned by and under the exclusive legislated jurisdiction of the United States of America have all the rights and immunities as citizens but are/as free inhabitants, not citizens (subjects) of the United States and its written law. Kent or Jo, or the Trusts, have never resided, or done acts, in the United States therefore you can not prove they are subject to the U.S. written law, or within the scope of your licensed authority to practice law.
Article IV free inhabitant are a fact of life, and you must accept the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 as positive law pursuant to the adoption of these articles and demonstrated in the Organic Laws of the United States of America. Such written law exists to prevent the very actions that your personal acts have accomplished, yet all done outside of the clearly written law. Wow to those, says the Bible, whom do such acts intentionally.
This NOTICE / Declaration in written form is simply further evidence of our status and a notice to all who may be reading this letter as to the facts of law already established in the Organic Laws which can easily be found in Volume 1 of the United States Code, Titles 1-5. May I suggest you purchase a copy for your law library if you do not already own one. Verify this for your own professional edification and that of your associates. A reply from you as the USA Attorney is not necessary, but is advised, to evidence these facts of law presented to you. Consider this consorted notice given to you, in your capacity as an Attorney for the United States of America regarding your inability to practice law in that capacity / location as a Bar licensed attorney.
The governments of the States are proprietary governments possessing authority over the Federal lands located within the outer boundaries of the states and are called, for purposes of distinction, “The State(s) of …” All proprietary jurisdiction is limited by statute found in Chap 5 of Title 28 of the United States Code to the land owned by and ceded to the United States of America and the subject Land from which you arrested Kent and Jo Hovind, is not land owned by or ceded to the United States of America. Surly you have been trained to look to see if the swimming pool is full of water before you dive-in, or throw someone else in. All acts done without Legislative permission leaves one standing alone with no immunity.
I can only conclude that your acts against the said Land in Trust and the Hovind’s were/are based on assumed “exclusive Legislative” “Authority” (jurisdiction) as to land “owned”, “Places purchased” or “ceded” to the United States of America, generally called USA Land, pursuant to Article I, Section 8, (par.17) USA Const. 1787. Now if the bridge is out a motorist best stop and turn around. Your attack upon the Trusts and the Hovind’s lack such Legislative permission. And do you believe you could withstand direct examination as to your claimed jurisdiction. The written law is a picture, worth a thousand word, how can it be disputed.
We are providing further evidence in the sections of United States Code referenced below to reinforce the facts of law provided in the Organic Laws of the United States of America. In Chap 5 of 28 U.S.C., you will find the following under Historical Notes and revisions as cited in positive law as of January 1, 1945.
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Sections 81-131 of this chapter show the territorial composition of districts and divisions by counties as of January 1, 1945. All references to dates were omitted as unnecessary.
Sections 81 through 131 are the names of 48 States, two territories, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. The astute attorney (reader) should notice that “Sections 81- 131” produce 51 Sections — one short. Alaska, the territory on January1, 1945, is Section 81A. There are 52 Districts on January 1, 1945 and there were 13 Districts on September 24, 1789 the date of the first Judiciary Act, when only 11 States had ratified the Constitution of September 17, 1787. On the date of the Judiciary Act of 1789 there was no mention of territorial composition because there was NO territory owned by the United States of America in any of the 11 States, which had ratified that Constitution. By January 1, 1945, the United States of America had purchased / acquired some territory in each of the thirteen original States and retained substantial territory in each of the remaining 35 States. The United States of America owned some territory in Alaska, Hawaii and Puerto Rico and was ceded all jurisdictions there on January1, 1945. “Sections 81 – 131 of this chapter show the territorial composition of districts and divisions by counties as of January 1, 1945,” so each “Section” from 81 to 131 will show the territorial composition of every class of “District.” It follows that each of the 48 States will contain territory equal to Section 88 District of Columbia, which consists of territory owned by and under the exclusive legislated jurisdiction of the United States of America otherwise known as U.S. government owned property or in its simplest form of the English language, federal territory. See as 89. Florida.
The Constitution referred to in the Declaration of Independence must be an unwritten one, for no one has seen it, but so must the law on the subject Lands be unwritten. The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the land and the Constitution of the State of California, for example, presuming the same for the State of Florida, says so in Article 3 Section 1: “The State of California is an inseparable part of the United States of America, and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land.” So the State of Florida is only land owned by the United States of America, a composition of land comparable to the District of Colombia, USA / Confederacy owned land.
The term “United States” is not the result of sloppy writing by English law experts who just happened to be writing a constitution. The context that determines the different meanings of the term “United States” is the entire Organic Law of the United States of America. The so-called Framers of the Constitution of 1787 intended the confusion we have with government today and that confusion can only be resolved by confronting those who are claiming power under that instrument.
I have now explained in detail what you, as a licensed attorney and professional legal adviser should already know about the written laws that bind you as an officer of the court and government employee in the contracted capacity as Attorney for the United States of America. The rest is up to you US Attorney, Robert Stinson, and I thank you for allowing me to clarify this legal obligation for you to tell the truth and not hide behind attorney-client privilege as this so called “privilege” is exempt in this case due to the criminal and fraudulent nature these facts of law expose to the private sector, and public at large, and to you as well, as to the regulating body of your legal profession known as the Florida State Bar Association. What constitutes the US Constitution? Answer US Land, US Law, US People, strike three.
____________________ June 11, 2011
Paul John Hansen, as Kent Hovind counsel, and Trustee of subject Trust property.
Cc – ____________________________________________________________________
Mailing witnessed by:________________________________________ Affidavit.
Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.