Enter your password to view comments.

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

How to block forced vaccinations. -Vaccine Estopple’.

We provide immediate counsel, and follow up aid, to anyone who is at risk of being harassed, or forced, into any type of vaccinations. Email us today – pauljjhansenlaw@gmail.com

Test Page

Posted: 28th June 2021 by admin in Uncategorized

This is only a ‘Test Page’ used for administrator testing.

Test 1 – 06-28-2021.

On last check 42 of the of the 50 states can not enforce the new yearly tag on state plates. I have a friend that has plate in CA in the years of 2005, it is now 2020, and no new tag. He drives daily in HOUSTON, TX.

I’ll eventually have a package available on this defense.

Because it was never intended to be used for identification — the SSA added the disclaimer “FOR SOCIAL SECURITY PURPOSES NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION” to the card in 1946, then removed it in 1972 during a redesign.

The above article is not accurate.
Palazzolo v. Rhode Island, 533 U.S. 606 (2001) is a case where the city did stop the development, contact owner for the exact details.

M1S – 90 MSO, New Auto, Saved 5000$ on plating fees.

‘MSO Retention’, new automobile purchases, success.

  1. Client wished to buy a new $50,500.00 sports car.
  2. Client wishes to retain the MSO (Manufacturing Statement of Origin) from the car dealership.
  3. Instructions – xxxx
  4. Client told dealership he did not want a loan, only direct payment.
  5. Client showed up on the day of closing and handed the owner of the dealership xxxx
  6. Dealership said he has no way of xxxx
  7. Client said that he has a friend xxxx
  8. Dealer said great.
  9. Client handed 50k xxxx
  10. Dealer then commenced writing a receipt to Client for xxxx
  11. Client said can I make a call to the local State Attorney General to make sure xxxx
  12. Client contacted State Attorney General, explained what the Dealer was doing with the receipt of payment, state attorney general said that would be a false receipt and a felony if it is over 300$.
  13. State attorney general proceeded to tell the Dealer to xxxx  
  14. Client saved more than 5000$ in tax, and xxxx 6% luxury tax, and he also now has the MSO.
  15. Client got a state xxxx from the Governor on the MSO, xxxx
  16. Then the Client had a copy xxxx laser engraved on two metal, front and rear, license size plates. (You can use durable plastic if you wish.)
  17. 2009 to the present (2020) client is often traveling from far middle-south to far north-east of America, no problems, with just an occasional short stop by state patrol.
  18. I do not know how he handles traffic citations; I trust he gets them occasionally; the car is rated as 1600 HP off the crank.
  19. Thus far no one has elected to find its top speed.

7/2020 – Lawyer, Paul John Hansen, freeinhabitant.info

Order the full INFO, and package that this client used to do the above > (CLICK HERE) then click on Product 99.


Posted: 3rd June 2020 by admin in Travel Rights

15$ Package, how to serve the proper government departments to get documentation of proof on/for non-governance, non-inclusion.

  1. All U.S. government agencies rely predominately on their misleading paper trail to give a presumption of administration, or inclusion.
  2. This is the case with registrations, licenses, and every taxable activity.
  3. We provide precise documents that force the various government agencies to correct their records and give you the necessary documents (apostille certified) to carry with you so you can readily show any ‘policy enforcer’ that you are ‘not to be detained’, and ‘not to be arrested’, unless observed in violating a true crime.
  4. Remember they must provide remedy, or be held personally commercially liable, as a matter of law.
  5. Lawyer Hansen – pauljjhansenLAW@gmail.com
  6. To order click on M1S 98.

TOOLS to Force Remedy.

Posted: 19th May 2020 by admin in Marshals, Remedy, Tools

The people I work with have achieved remedy in excess of four (4) billion dollars using the below. A chess game of many pieces, not easily won. One gets to be a master chess player by losing thousands of games, we have lost thousands to get to the point of now losing few. You need not repeat our progression, simply utilize our services.

  1. FOIA Request;
  2. FDCPA Request;
  3. Administrative Process;
  4. Notary Presentment,
  5. Video recording of mailing contents;
  6. Filing in a government office for later need for certified copies for court evidence;
  7. File for Record v. Registration/Recording;
  8. Affidavits / Statements / Verifications;
  9. Negative Armaments;
  10. Positive Averments;
  11. Challenges;
  12. Motions;
  13. Judicial Notice;
  14. Aid of U.S. Marshals upon judges duty to follow the law;
  15. Use judges tenure as leverage;
  16. ‘Bill of Rights of 1791’, as afforded to you as a man with unalienable rights;
  17. Make no statements, keep full burden on moving party;
  18. Use ‘calls for a legal determination’;
  19. Common Law of Man v. Common Law of ‘Persons’ / ‘States’;
  20. Courtesy, non-accusatory, non-emotional, grace;
  21. Use the sealing of the case in your financial favor (leverage).
  22. Proof of clearance/independence by Governor with State Apostille.


Sunday, 17 October 2021

Dear Chris,

Good afternoon.  Pray all well.

Thank you for your thoughtful reply & information.

For the last thirty (30) years, these statutes

have been successfully employed right to the present,

with happy, Liberty preserving, regular results,

by occasioning constitutionally sworn law enforcement officials

to be immediately, physically present,

in courtrooms or any other settings,

to promptly restore Civil Liberties (under 18 USC 245),

should breaches occur within their sight.

18 USC 245  specifically empowers all sworn law enforcement


                    –  including  federal, state & local  – 

to enforce these federal civil liberties statutes

in any state, territory, or district they happen to be in  – 

subject to The People’s Original Authority 

memorialized in the US Constitution and

operated in Article VI. 

Thus, a new hire, sworn patrolman from Paducah, KY

on vacation in the US Virgin Islands,

observing a deprivation of rights under color of law,

may arrest an offender with full constitutional authority.

Indeed, Citizens likewise have their Original Authority

in such circumstances  –  where ever they happen to observe

an offense  –  to effect their Citizens Arrests based on

their highest Original Authority as The People.

It happens very quickly  –  as you can imagine it would,

for those intimately familiar with operation of law,

such as judges, prosecutors, bailiffs, clerks, and others  –

that they return smartly to constitutional compliance,

not wishing to suffer career ending episodes,

which can become irrevocable, with alarming rapidity,

in the presence of sworn arresting officers or

The People.

Generally, it becomes a teaching moment  –

with not uncommon result that above offenders,

are grateful for the moment of grace,

to learn of the reality of their constitutional obligation

to preserve Liberty 

and they become some of the best advocates

for operating law with that consideration uppermost,

thenceforward  –  an important multiplier effect

for Christ’s Liberty across society… a revival, per se.

Thus, in present moment, above technique becomes

                          Ready, Complete,


for folks in all US counties to quickly bring an end

to overreaching mandates locally  –  with full

Supreme Law of The Land, Article VI effect.

Thank you for your other information Chris. 

Thinking for deploying this muscular, streamlined,

directed, Article VI Constitutional Enforcement Remedy,

is that it can be done promptly,

with highest Original Authority,

without necessity of further lawyering on local law,

and with the thing speaking for itself, in simplicity.

   Chris, would you have interest in gathering

   freedom loving, like-minded citizens in New York

   to receive additional operating tips in this application,

   for their prompt deployment in your liberty challenged state?

Please say.

Thank you for your ongoing service to our country.

With My Compliments,

Liberty In Christ,


    —– Forwarded message —–         From:  Chris
Date:   Saturday, 16 October 2021   
To:       Christopher
Subj:    FW: San Diego Police Can Arrest Officials             Requiring Mandates on Federal Felony Charges

Whether a Sheriff has original authority over Federal law as opposed to State Penal Code per se has been kicked around involving immigration law that I argue is covered in provisions of that law but it has been debated for 30 years to my direct knowledge. However, in developing a RICO case (a very difficult action as with a qui tam case ends up with an attorney in charge) that can be civilly acted on uses State PENAL Law violations – criminal law is wholly within a Sheriff’s Jurisdiction, and is a component of RICO by design; but the gist of this matter is criminal not civil – The Nuremberg Code unlike  the Helsinki Accords as a treaty was never approved by the Senate depends on State Penal Code and even the International Covenant for Civil and Political Rights is evisceraated has many omitted exceptions especially thanks to Reagan until Sen. Proxmire came along in 1986 with his Anti-Genocide law.     However, to the extent  that ALL public officers take an oath first to the state constitution and then to uphold the Federal Constitution under the 14th amendment there may be traction.There are 3006  Sheriffs, LEOs, in this country with original jurisdiction over criminal violations. I cannot think of a single reason to have the Federal Government other than to collect taxes to make progress payments to foreign entities on debt service per se and to violate state citizens rights.      See,  https://www.scribd.com/document/528721431/NOTICE-OF-PETITION-w-Petition-20-Exhibits-Motion-to-declare-the-2016-CURES-ACT-unconstitutional-RE-matter-of-Strunk-v-LaFarr-Etal-NYSSC-Warren-County  Chris       ____      

     —– Original Message —–       
From:  Deacon             
Sent:    Saturday, 16 October 2021   

Subj:    San Diego Police Can Arrest Officials Requiring Mandates on Federal Felony Charges

Saturday, 16 October 2021

Dear Friends & Fellow Citizens,

Good evening.  Pray all well.

News reports describe 90% of San Diego Police Officers
do not wish to participate in the Injection Fraud.

It is similar across the country.

Please see,

  “90 Percent of San Diego Police Opposed to Vaccine…”


Sadly, the following Helpful Comment
was immediately Shadowed Banned
from the Comments Section
of the above article at, Citizen Free Press,

  “…The San Diego Police have only to use
    the ‘Legal Brief & Courtesy Notice’
    seen at  www.badassunclesam.com.

    As sworn Constitutional Law Enforcement Officers
    they have Full Authority to Detain & Arrest
    Public Officials Illegally Requiring Mandates,
    on Felony Federal Charges, under,

        ‘Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law’,  18 USC 242,
        ‘Conspiracy Against Rights’,  18 USC 241.

    Both Sections carry 10 yr. Prison Sentences & Fines.

    Also, ‘Federally Protected Activities’ in  18 USC 245,
    expressly Authorizes Sworn Local Officers to Detain & Arrest
    Any Official who Deprives Anyone of their Federal Civil Liberties…

                                       Anywhere,  Anytime.

    This will End Mandates Immediately,
    County by County,
    in All 3,142 US Counties,
    under Authority of the US Constitution,
    Article VI, using Natural Law from Nature’s God.

    See the Legal Brief.”

The above 18 USC Sections, as Laws of the United States,
in pursuance of the US Constitution,
are The Supreme Law of The Land,
per Article VI,
and are always Senior  –  and never junior or subordinate  –
to any other statute, ordinance, regulation, edict, mandate,
custom or usage.

Meanwhile, it appears Citizen Free Press is a ‘limited hangout’
designed to keep Americans in a ‘complaining,
defeatist frame of mind’, instead of simply Rising Up
to operate their God-given, Constitutional Authority
restoring their Full Liberty, in the moment.

Freedom is yours America.  Take it.

Thank you.

Liberty In Christ,


  Please see Attachments.

  Your ‘Walking Liberty’ awaits you.



https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/16pdf/15-1500_h3cj.pdf (Lewis v. Clark, Indemnity Claim)








Two Classes of (c)Citizenship

Posted: 17th December 2019 by admin in Citizen vs. Free Inhabitant

The 1901 Downes vs Bidwell decision and later the 1945 Hooven & Allison Co. vs Evatt decision addressed the latter two classes of (c)Citizenship: 

A TERRITORIAL citizen has no rights. A TERRITORIAL citizen is, simply, SUBJECT to The Congress. A SUBJECT IS A SLAVE.    A state Citizen, on the other hand, is also subject to the Congress, BUT, with a Stipulation: ” 

A state Citizen has Rights.   A State Citizen enjoys The Congress ‘…bound by the chains of the constitution’ when legislating over the state citizen.  A state Citizen is differentiated from a territorial citizen in writing by the capitalization of the letter “C” in Citizenship for a state Citizen and the use of lower case for the territorial citizenship in legal writings.

The *American class is NOT a class of citizenship and is NEVER discussed by government today.  The *American class has Rights provided by YaHuWaH, The All Mighty ONE, Whom our Founding Fathers called ‘Providence’.


EVERYTHING, you think about that relates to ‘freedom’ is ensconced in these people.

Sovereignty was first recognized by the high Court in this case.


SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 2 U.S. 419; 1 L. Ed. 440; 1793 U.S.

LEXIS 249; 2 Dall. 419

“To the Constitution of the United States the term SOVEREIGN, is totally unknown.  There is but one place where it could have been used with propriety.   But, even in that place it would not, perhaps, have comported with the delicacy of those, who ordained [***86] and established that Constitution.  They might have announced themselves “SOVEREIGN” people of the United States: But serenely conscious of the fact, they avoided the ostentatious declaration.”

“As the State has claimed precedence of the people; so, in the same inverted course of things, the Government has often claimed precedence of the State; and to this perversion in the Second degree, many of the volumes of confusion concerning sovereignty owe their existence.”

Sovereignty was defined and those who are sovereign were identified by this case; and, it is the standing law on sovereignty today.

Supreme Court in DRED SCOTT v. JOHN F. A. SANDFORD, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), where the High Court stated, in relevant part:  “…The words “people of the United States” and “citizens” are synonymous terms, and mean the same thing.   They both describe the political body who, according to our republican institutions, form the sovereignty, and who hold the power and conduct the Government through their representatives.  They are what we familiarly call the ‘sovereign people’, and every citizen is one of this people, and a constituent member of this sovereignty…”

“It is true, every person, and every class and description of persons,  who were AT THE TIME OF THE ADOPTION OF THE CONSTITUTION recognized as citizens in the several States, BECAME ALSO CITIZENS OF THIS POLITICAL BODY; BUT NONE OTHER; IT WAS FORMED BY THEM, AND FOR THEM AND THEIR POSTERITY, BUT FOR NO ONE ELSE.  And the personal rights and privileges guarantied to citizens of this new sovereignty were intended to embrace those only who were then members of the several   State communities, or who should afterwards by birthright or otherwise become members,  according to the provisions of the Constitution and the  principles on which it was founded.” (emphasis added) Scott v. Sanford, 60 U.S. 393, at 406.

Even the States recognize this sovereignty.

R. W. Kemper v. The State,


63 Tex. Crim. 1; 138 S.W. 1025; 1911 Tex. Crim. App.


“The rule in America is that the American people are the sovereign, and in them is lodged all power, and the agencies of government possess no authority save that which is delegated to them by the people…”.

Also, see Perry v. United States,

294 US 330, 353 (1935), “The Congress as the instrumentality of sovereignty is endowed with certain powers to be exerted on behalf of the people in the manner and with the effect the Constitution ordains.  The Congress cannot invoke the sovereign power of the people to override their will as thus declared.”

So, what is the big picture here?

When we were Colonists and then formed the various states of The Union, we recognized that ‘