Client Notice

Posted: 3rd July 2017 by admin in Facebook
Comments Off on Client Notice

NOTICE: If you have paid for services that are highly technical and of the type that may not be implemented for several years as strategies are assembled and evaluated. Such is done so that when implemented you will get the most for your money. I have recently worked with the highest level legal minds in the nation who are constantly attempting to construct strategies to stop the expansion of ‘statism’ and its ever expanding deprivation of clearly defined God given rights. So if you are such a person please contact us no less than every six months to inquire as to progress. Due to computer hacking, and record complications, your purchased service needs may have become mistakenly, unnoticed presently.

NOTICE: Paul John Hansen never puts himself out as an ‘association’ BAR member, or acting attorney. And the use of the term ‘lawyer’* is only to communicate (Hansen’s) chosen profession (<CLICK), as the right of man, independent of any state, legal entities, or associations, as stated. Paul John Hansen does not wish to do business in land of any United States Jurisdiction.

(*lawyer, lauier, lawer, lawere (mid-14c. as a surname), -one versed in law, one whose profession is suits in court, or client advice on legal rights, having no association with any activity with license, or professional associations’.)

If the term attorney, or lawyer, appears in this site, or any web site used by Hansen, that alludes to any licensed activity it has been placed there by hackers, and Hansen asks that such be noticed to him so it can be corrected immediately.

                                                                                                                   Paul John Hansen

Comments Off on Court of Record, the Superior court, Common Law, ‘the People’s court, Template:
  1. How to exercise right of ‘one of the People’.
  2. How to utilize the local courthouse, magistrates, and sheriffs, to proceed with a common law proceeding, in your land jurisdiction.
  3. How to get a judgment that can not be challenged, or altered, by a US statutory court jurisdiction.
  4. How to be subject to a jury of 12 men, all being of your piers, independent of the aiding magistrate.
  5. How to counterclaim foreign jurisdiction court rulings.
  6. Study this template, then formulate your own ‘complaint’, under right of man, with aid from people that have done more than 300 actions.
  7. This package cost 25$, identified as MS-112. Click on ‘SERVICES/PRODUCTS. ………’ at top of this site.

Right to Travel, Step by Step how to hold it.

Posted: 7th August 2024 by admin in Travel Rights
Comments Off on Right to Travel, Step by Step how to hold it.
  1. This expounded product is soon to be available from freeinhabitant.info.
  2. Who
  3. What
  4. When
  5. Where
  6. How
  7. Why
  8. What to put on your car, as notice, or plates.
  9. Paul Severe Youtube.

View Post

Comments Off on How to Stop Filing IRS 1040s, and State Income Tax Forms, Step by Step:

We have clients that make one million dollars per day and file no federal or state, but they do follow our program to keep the liability for “billing” upon the federal (IRS), and state tax collectors. We never refuse, only challenge, with formal offer to pay. I, Paul John Hansen, lawyer, personally make 15 to 25K$ per month, at times, and never file, for the last 25 years with no problems, and do no hiding of my assets. See freeinhabitant.info, and pauljjhansen.com, for all our services, and aiding products.

  1. Ask the tax collector to formally present you with a formal tax bill, under penalties of perjury, in his own personal commercial liability.
  2. Send the demand by (certified (green card return) mailing with the appropriate affidavit.
  3. Have the same sent by us as a disinterested third party.
  4. Offer to pay upon receiving the formal, as a matter of law, signed bill.
  5. Do not ever self assess, and present our brief why it is a violation of law to demand an individual to self assess under penalties of perjury. They seldom prosecute if you do not file, they often prosecute if you do file.
  6. Peruse through the below and learn how to keep the burden on the tax collector, federal, or state, at all times.
  7. See – https://freeinhabitant.info/irs/6203-irs-assessment-request-50-irs-wins.htm
  8. See – https://freeinhabitant.info/irs/289.htm
  9. See – https://freeinhabitant.info/irs/irs-auditor-reveals-notice-tool-to-show-as-a-non-taxpayer-status.htm
  10. See – http://www.pauljjhansen.com/?p=2052
  11. See – http://www.pauljjhansen.com/?p=1564
  12. See – http://www.pauljjhansen.com/?p=1412
  13. See – http://www.pauljjhansen.com/?p=1320
  14. See – http://www.pauljjhansen.com/?p=1217
  15. See – http://www.pauljjhansen.com/?p=894

Comments Off on United States “citizen” and United States “business” are synonymous, as a matter of written law.

15 U.S.C. § 4724 – U.S. Code – Unannotated Title 15. Commerce and Trade § 4724.

(e)Definitions

As used in this section–

(1) the term “United States business” means–

(A) a United States citizen;

(B) a corporation, partnership, or other association created under the laws of the United States or of any State (including the District of Columbia or any commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States); or

(C) a foreign corporation, partnership, or other association, more than 95 percent of which is owned by persons described in subparagraphs (A) and (B); and

Comments Off on 501c3, How to Dissolve a 501(c)(3) Nonprofit Organization

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/2/#inbox?projector=1

How to Dissolve a 501(c)(3) Nonprofit Organization, step by step.

Unlawful Arrest, Right to Resist

Posted: 16th March 2024 by admin in Arrest, Uncategorized
Comments Off on Unlawful Arrest, Right to Resist

“Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer’s life if necessary.” Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306.


• “An arrest made with a defective warrant, or one issued without affidavit, or one that fails to allege a crime is within jurisdiction, and one who is being arrested, may resist arrest and break away. lf the arresting officer is killed by one who is so resisting, the killing will be no more than an involuntary manslaughter.” Housh v. People, 75 111. 491; reaffirmed and quoted in State v. Leach, 7 Conn. 452; State v. Gleason, 32 Kan. 245; Ballard v. State, 43 Ohio 349; State v Rousseau, 241 P. 2d 447; State v. Spaulding, 34 Minn. 3621.

• “When a person, being without fault, is in a place where he has a right to be, is violently assaulted, he may, without retreating, repel by force, and if, in the reasonable exercise of his right of self defense, his assailant is killed, he is justified.” Runyan v. State, 57 Ind. 80; Miller v. State, 74 Ind. 1.

• “These principles apply as well to an officer attempting to make an arrest, who abuses his authority and transcends the bounds thereof by the use of unnecessary force and violence, as they do to a private individual who unlawfully uses such force and violence.” Jones v. State, 26 Tex. App. I; Beaverts v. State, 4 Tex. App. 1 75; Skidmore v. State, 43 Tex. 93, 903.

• “An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery.” (State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260).

• “Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case, the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of force, as in self- defense.” (State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100).

• “One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as he may where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus it is not an offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an officer, even though he may have submitted to such custody, without resistance.” (Adams v. State, 121 Ga. 16, 48 S.E. 910).

Comments Off on Can the Democrats (Biden) Restrict Your Right to Bear Arms? (2nd Article/Amendment 1791 USA const.)

NO, they have no right to make any law, against any right, of the man of right, in American land.

But remember, you do not have rights in land that is given as trust to the United States for military use.

All acts of congress are limited by the US Constitution, which is a military document.

So the US Supreme Court is not entertaining your right of anything ever, they are only authorized as to your limited liberty and privilege, when in US owned land which is 25% of America, approximately.

Protected: 1040X Refund Program:

Posted: 31st March 2023 by admin in 1040X
Comments Off on Protected: 1040X Refund Program:

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

EJUSDEM GENERIS. Of the same kind.

Posted: 21st March 2023 by admin in Uncategorized
Comments Off on EJUSDEM GENERIS. Of the same kind.

Definitions:

State,

Federal,

Key “terms”.

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/7e1unl8aovujj5nehf7ml/STATE-definitions-10.2015.docx?dl=0&rlkey=3gfwycsz94i1jn29rwrxd4zk1

Comments Off on DMV Reciprocity between states and nations.

With a closer look, the below distinctly does not violate right of man’s travel.

https://www.dps.texas.gov/section/driver-license/driving-privilege-reciprocity

Driving Privilege Reciprocity:

Driving privilege reciprocity allows a person to use a valid, unexpired foreign license to operate a motor vehicle* in Texas for up to one year or until a person becomes a Texas resident*, whichever date is sooner. Once a person becomes a new Texas resident, they must apply for a Texas license within 90 days to continue to drive legally. For more information, please review the Moving to Texas page.

 Noncommercial* licenses: The state’s recognition of driving privilege reciprocity is governed by the following international agreements coordinated and signed by the federal government. To see a list of countries for each agreement, click the link provided. provided.

•            1943 Inter-American Convention on the Regulation of Inter-American Automotive Traffic (PDF)

•            North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) agreement and countries

•            Per U.S. State Department consideration: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Estonia, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, Serbia, Slovenia, and Yugoslavia. General Provisions of International Agreements:

•            Reciprocal privileges are limited to persons ages 18 to 75 for up to one year from the date of entry into the United States.

•            Reciprocal privileges are limited to private vehicles.

•            Every vehicle must have a registration certificate issued in accordance with the laws of the country of residence identifying the vehicle and owner and be displayed on the rear of the vehicle or on a plate attached to the rear.

•            Every vehicle must have an oval sign or plaque displayed on the rear of the vehicle to indicate the country of origin.

•            Every driver must have a valid driver permit, license, or international permit issued by an authorized authority and be translated into English.

Note: These are general provisions only. For the complete text of an agreement, click the links provided.

Commercial licenses:

Only commercial driver licenses from Canada and Mexico are recognized by the U.S. Secretary of Transportation as having full reciprocity for driving privileges* in the state of Texas*.

Comments by Paul J Hansen 2/2023:

*motor vehicle – is commercial use, for profit use, in state of Texas. (Right of travel is independent.)

*Noncommercial,  *privilege – the key is privilege, such is not synonymous with right of man for travel.

*’state of Texas’ – is a term, a federal zone/land, in Texas.  (a state within a state)

P.S. I was told, by a lawyer, that only 42 of the 50 states agree to enforce each others DMV laws, out of the respective state.

The example given me was a man from California had a car in Texas with a plate 15 years expired, he got picked up at times, and always challenged if ‘State of Texas’ has a Reciprocity Agreement with ‘State of California’ to enforce State of California motor vehicle codes, the cases were always dismissed.