Protected: Get State ID and Passport with no Social Security Number, Full Audios. M1Sp-44 (5$)

Posted: 4th August 2011 by admin in I.D., Pass Port, State I.D.
Comments Off on Protected: Get State ID and Passport with no Social Security Number, Full Audios. M1Sp-44 (5$)

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Impounded, No Registration, Jurisdictional Challenge

Posted: 4th August 2011 by admin in Exclusive Legislative Authority, Free Inhabitant ONE A INTRO, Territorial jurisdiction
Comments Off on Impounded, No Registration, Jurisdictional Challenge

Re: NOTICE / Letter to company that towed the subject automobile.    Mailed 8-2-2011.

From:

Paul John Hansen,

Lawyer / Counsel without the United States,

1548 N 19 Street,

Omaha, Nebraska 68110,

not a resident address.

402-957-2853

To:

B and B Towing, or B & B Garage

Post Office Box 307

205 South 1st Street

Springfield, NE  68059

402) 253-2434

It has come to my attention that you were called by an individual, an acting Employee named Janda, badge number 1032, that was attempting to act for the Sarpy County Sheriff, of Sarpy County, of the State of Nebraska, which is an inseparable part of the United States of America.

Said Individual Employee, called Janda, did contact the addressed B & B Towing / Garage, on the date of 8-1-2011, of the Hour of 1038 (am), and then gave instruction to have removed / towed, a Ford F150 Truck, owned by Paul John Hansen, from an address location of  3005 Comstock Avenue, Bellevue, NE, private property parking lot, which at the time was open to free access, all without the United States.

This letter is a Notice that the subject automobile was towed without the instruction of the owner of the private land as addressed, and also without the Pickup Truck owners permission.

This Notice is to inform you to immediately contact me by the contact number as provided above and give me a time when and where you can meet with me and have the automobile returned to me, the owner, at a jurisdiction without the United States.

Be it noticed to you, that you took my property without a court order, warrant, or judgment of a court of jurisdiction, without permission of the Land owner of the location of the event, and without permission from Me as the sole owner, and at a location in which the Land is without the United States, and with out evidence of “exclusive Legislative.. Authority” from anyone involved pursuant to Article I, Section 8, (par.17) USA Construction of 1787, as found in the current United State Code.

I am an advance student of written law, the Noticed law that you are hereby given is of easy access to all with diligence of an imperial desire to know the fact truth of all Authority, or the lack thereof, as related to the subject matter of the taking of private property without lawful permission at the subject location.

The taking of my said property constituted damage to me of 100 United States Dollars, in equivalence as exchangeable gold, per each 24 hours, or part thereof, as each day that you hold my property without written authority from Me as the owner in possession.

The question is, can you produce fact evidence, sufficient to withstand an examination challenge, that the subject Land of all issues as related were and are, in fact, land that is of such a type as to be included in the following term as “State”:  Nebraska Revised Statute 60-666, “State, defined (DMV)   State shall mean a state, territory, or possession of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or a province of Canada.”

For if you can not prove such a fact it will stand as not existing, and if not existing you are fully exposed with no protection of law for all the damage done and possibly a criminal element can be proven before a jury with authority to impose deterrents.

The Bible advises one to know your opposition’s strength before asserting any demand.  I assure you that my strength is equal to, or greater than, the written law that you may believed you were relying upon.

If the subject Land is not owned by the United States of America all believed passed authority to tow my property and hold it for ransom is nonexistent.

My challenge to you, for the burden is yours alone, to prove with fact evidence, that the subject Land (towing location) is owned, by the employer, of the individual, that instructed you to tow my Pickup Truck, and take it to another location.

NOTICE: THIS IS AN OFFICIAL COUNTER-FORFEITURE CLAIM FOR DAMAGES AGAINST THE ABOVE NAMED OBLIGATED PARTIES, AS WELL AS A NOTICE OF INTENT TO LIEN, AND IS INTENDED TO MEET ALL NOTICE REQUIREMENTS FOR ADDITIONAL LAWFUL ACTION AGAINST YOU/THEM SHOULD FURTHER PURSUIT BECOME NECESSARY.

The party that took My vehicle, by using their equipment, and their employees, for profit, stands fully responsible to return the property as instructed or face all consequences.

It is organized plunder to take that which is not yours with no written permission existing, from a court of competent jurisdiction, for your act, and it is sure going to be interesting to see the unfolding of who pays who what for such cooperation of constructive illegal acts.

See attached brief that supports the need for written permission.

___________________ Paul John Hansen

BRIEF:

Fact:

  1. The subject Land as addressed above is without the United States / UNITED STATES INC., pursuant to 28 U.S.C. PART VI CHAPTER 176 SUBCHAPTER A § 3002(14) (15)(A):  (15) “United States” means— (A) a Federal corporation;
  2. No evidence can be found that the subject Land is owned by the “United States of America” as the term is used in Article I, of the United States Constitution, Quote; “The stile of this confederacy shall be, The United States of America.”
  3. No evidence can be found that the subject Land is within the “exclusive Legislative…Authority” as the term is used in Article I, Section 8, (par.17) USA Const. 1787, Quote- “To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession (D.C.) of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings; And”…
  4. Paul John Hansen stands as owner of the Pickup with claim of all unalienable rights afforded me as an Article IV free inhabitant by Ratification of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 and pursuant to the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776.
  5. Said “Organic Laws” are located in Volume 1 of the United States Code, Titles 1-5 which is published every 6 years by the United States Government Printing Office.  You will see the Organic Laws of the United States of America are provided for all Americans to see and are proven to exist long before any statute laws of the United States were written.
  6. This acts as a notice to all government employee, or one acting by order, of any US government, that ignorance of the written laws that limit authority to the land owned by and under the exclusive Legislative (Law making) Authority (jurisdiction) of the United States of America is no excuse for ANY government or private employee / entity / person.
  7. In Chapter 5 of Title 28 under Historical Revisions and Notes, Sections 81-131, the law defines and shows the territorial composition of the United States as of January 1, 1945, essentially what land the US written laws apply. Noting that all land outside of such districts is without the United States and such would include the subject land as associated with the above towing.  No evidence exist that the subject Land is included in any listed District composition of land as described here.  To which the moving party must prove to proceed in any way against me.

Digital proof of mailing, (archived) of the above three (3) page letter / NOTICE, the following was:

-Digitally recorded as mailed on the date of 8-3-2011, 11:00am.

-addressed.

-post paid,

-the above exact copy of the letters / pages enclosed,

-sealed,

-deposited into a United States irretrievable mailbox,

all on a digital recording to have proof of notice by mailing.

_________________Paul John Hansen

 

–NOTICE–       (SC-101249)   Clerk is asked to “File for Record”.

 

To: , Sarpy Sheriff’s Office, Sheriff’s Administration, Investigations, and Road Patrol,  8335 Platteview Road, Papillion NE 68046,   402-593-2288

To: Clerk, Sarpy County Courthouse, 1210 Golden Gate Dr. Papillion, NE, without the United States.

To: Govenor Heineman, Office of the Governor, P.O. Box 94848 Lincoln, NE 68509-4848

To: Mayor  , Papillion City Hall 122 East 3rd Street, Papillion, NE 68046, without the United States.   402.597.2000

From: Paul John Hansen 1548 N 19 Omaha, Nebraska, without the United States.

402-957-2853

This is to inform / NOTICE the STATE OF NEBRASKA, as an inseparable part of the United States, of the following:

Regarding- Uniform Citation and Complaint, SC- 101249, which is not an information, and not a summons supported by a sworn affidavit by the acting Officer.

-That no agreement for appearance has been made for fact reason #1. No signature of contract agreement appears on the document.  #2. “No agree” does appear on the document.

-That State of Nebraska licensed attorneys can only exercise such permission, of the said license to practice law in the United States / State of Nebraska, on land that is in fact the State of Nebraska, as fact constituted land owned by the United States of America.

-That all State of Nebraska statutes only have force and effect of law on land that is within the exclusive Legislative…Authority of the Unite States of America (State of Nebraska).

-That State of Nebraska employee Janda No. 1032 could / can produce “no” evidence that all acts of this subject Citation were acted on land owned by the United States of America.

-That State of Nebraska employee Janda No. 1032, acted on his own authority, or by instruction, to deprive Me of my right to travel and hold, and use, my property (F150 Ford Truck) as not violating anyone’s rights, as a “free inhabitant” pursuant to Article IV of the Articles of Confederation of 1777, while on land not owned by the United States of America.

-That if the State of Nebraska, or employee Janda No. 1032, upon being noticed of the standing United States written law that bars such enforcement at the subject location and continues it is an act of plunder and dereliction of an expressed duty, subject to the free inhabitants jurisdiction, and or an US military action.

-That all parties involved have a duty to work in concert and restore Me with the possession of the subject Ford Truck immediately.  Obey your constituted limits.

((SEE– Brief , US Law, and additional Notices on back, plus 3 pages of documents attached.))

See NOTICE of “No Consent” on the back of this document.

Mailed on 8-4-2011, to the above addressed individuals, by:

___________________ Paul John Hansen.

                                                         (Signed in Blue Ink.)

(OVER)

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Land Patent is fact proof not USA / Federal Land.

Posted: 14th July 2011 by admin in Land Patent
Comments Off on Land Patent is fact proof not USA / Federal Land.

Hello Mr. Hansen, this is Nate Felton with the Bureau of Land Management returning your call. Concerning proof or documentation regarding federal issue or lack thereof. You can reach me at area code (703) 440-1511 . This is July the 14th. I should be in the office all day, you can, I think, just give me a call and you can contact me and give me the information regarding the legal Land Description and such as to the Section, Township, Range, and quarter, and quarter section, about the property and we will check our records and let you know we have, if we can provide you with a copy of a patent that conveyed that property out of Federal ownership, or whether or not that patent does not exist, which is then proof that the Federal Government owns the property.ral Government owns the property.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Dr Ed Rivera’s Class/Student Offer

Posted: 12th July 2011 by admin in Rivera Class
Comments Off on Dr Ed Rivera’s Class/Student Offer

The course shows you why Ed got dis-bared for winning his cases by simply challenging territorial jurisdiction in US Courts.

Ed Rivera’s Offer / Class, initially provided by Paul Hansen,

pauljjhansen.com,   freeinhabitant.info:

Ed Rivera is making an offer I trust will serve you well the remaining days of your life.

In addition to the totally free searchable Organic Laws of the United States of America, which are attached, Rivera is offering the materials of the $500 “Basic Course in Law and Government” with the down payment of just $50.  For one tenth of 1% of what Harvard Law School charges for one year, you will get a better legal education than Barack Hussein Obama got at Harvard. To get the same written materials that everyone else has had to pay many times for. Your first payment will be $50 to one of my recruiters, Paul Hansen, you only have to agree to pay the balance of $450, when you feel you have gotten your money’s worth and you feel you can afford the amount you decide to pay.

Here’s how it will work: within a month of receiving the first two Lessons you either make a payment of what you can afford or you tell me what the Course needs to make you a legal genius within a year.  I will try to correct the deficiency privately with you.  If you are not satisfied with my resolution of your claim, you may keep all the materials you have received and you owe no more than what you have paid.

You become an immediate Student just making the initial $50 payment.

Why is Ed Rivera making this offer?  The Course is already heavily discounted from its true worth, however, Ed’s Students can be counted by dozens. By making this offer, Dr. Rivera want to expand the Student body by hundreds and then thousands.

More information about Dr Rivera and the Course is attached in the Student Letter, Student Testimonials and Lessons Instructions.

I, Paul Hansen have two websites to promote sound principles of American Law, one being pauljjhansen.com currently visited by more than 4000 people daily, and a new site called  freeinhabitant.info.  The freeinhabitant.info site will have portions specifically available to paying students and will have extensive ongoing real life presentments of people all across the country who are taking Rivera’s teaching and effecting their communities and personal independence and freedoms.   As an introductory gift to all students they will receive the 45 minute PowerPoint Presentation entitled “Free Inhabitant One A” created by Paul Hansen.

Paul Hansen



NOTICE – 3-24-14 – Due to recent difficulties with Paypal send all payment by mailing money orders payable to Paul John Hansen, mailing address 1548 N 19, Omaha, NE 68110.

LESSONS INSTRUCTIONS, from instructor Dr Rivera

My Basic Course in Law and Government teaches that all government is severely limited when government by nobility is ended after Lord Cornwallis is defeated at Yorktown, but soon clever men led by George Washington abound to fill the void with written laws, military governments and government men.

This Course is different from all other courses or training in law, because it is not based on the assumption that the Constitution of the United States replaced, repealed or superseded the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777.  All four Organic Laws of the United States of America are viable and necessary to a correct understanding of the territorial limitations of the 50 Titles of the United States Code.

The Course is taught entirely online, so there is no reason why the entire Course cannot be read in a few hours.  Complete comprehension of the Course materials may take many years, but even the most inexperienced Student will quickly be able to find and understand the critical parts of the Organic Laws, which prove the lawmaking and taxation power of Congress to be limited to the territory owned by the United States of America.   We are experiencing the last days of an out of control government based on a military government model, if we cannot prove convincingly that George Washington led a military coup, under cover of  the Constitution of September 17, 1787, we may be stuck with bad government for another 200 years.

The Lessons are for the exclusive use of the Students and are not to be reproduced or distributed in any way.  The Posts on my website may be reproduced and distributed.

The First Lesson: Coloring the Presidents in the Constitution

The First Lesson will teach you to separate the different Offices of President between the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 and Constitution of the United States.  The Constitution of September 17, 1787 is both a temporary revision of the Articles of Confederation and a permanent alteration of the Articles of Confederation over a period of several months.  The temporary revision of the Articles occurs when the first nine States ratify the Constitution of September 17, 1787.  Nine States alone can elect “a President of the United States of America” and the first Senators, who cannot qualify as Senators under the Constitution of September 17, 1787.  The new Senators will replace the Delegates of the United States in Congress assembled, but they will not qualify as Senators under the Constitution of September 17, 1787.  The replacement of the Delegates with the State’s newly chosen Senators was the only replacement that occurred.  The Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 were not replaced when the first nine States ratified the Constitution of September 17, 1787.   Replacement of the Articles of Confederation by the Constitution of the United States did not occur when the ratification by Rhode Island made the revisions a permanent alteration of the Articles of Confederation.

The Second Lesson: George Washington Jailer and Tax Collector

The Second Lesson, George Washington Jailer and Tax Collector, teaches how Washington put the Office of President of the United States of America and Office of President of the United States together to create the so-called Leader of the Free World.  After George Washington joined the power of the State with the force of the government, he insisted: “Just call me Mr. President.”  Hitler joined two of the same kind of Offices, required that a personal oath be taken to him and that he be called the “Fuehrer.” Adolf Hitler started World War II 150 years after George Washington swore his oral oath, to “preserve, protect and defend” the Constitution of the United States.

THE PURPOSE OF THE FIRST TWO LESSONS

The purpose of this Course is to open the eyes of the Student to the facts expressed by the written word and unvarnished history.  I invite the Student to question every proposition I present and to doubt every   conclusion I make until all possible alternatives are eliminated, leaving only the truth.

THE WRITTEN LAWS,  LESSONS THREE AND FOUR

The Posts on my website constitute Lesson three.  Every Post must be read and understood by the Basic Course in Law and Government Student

Lesson Four, the Statute Laws passed and enacted during the first four Congresses show how George Washington took control using written law.  Hitler followed Washington’s example with the Nuremburg Laws.  George Washington wasn’t a monster, but he made it possible for minor and major monsters to use government against the people.  You will learn that the Constitution of September 17, 1787 was established by the first nine States to ratify that Constitution, but the Constitution was never “Adopted,” so the Constitution of the United States is no more than legislation passed by the States to administer the territory belonging to the Confederacy, the United States of America.

You will get another 200 hundred pages of the rest of the laws enacted during George Washington’s two terms.  I use all these laws to prove federal laws have from the beginning been limited the federal territory, the United States.  The Posts and future Lessons will refer to specific laws in these pages.   For the present, be familiar with the first 75 pages and all the Posts.

Tell me what you think after reading the Lessons and looking at the laws.

Ed                        edrivera.com
Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Protected: Blank, Visibility Limited, Passcode Required

Posted: 1st July 2011 by admin in Blank
Comments Off on Protected: Blank, Visibility Limited, Passcode Required

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Free Inhabitant One A, INTRO

Posted: 22nd June 2011 by admin in Free Inhabitant ONE A INTRO
Comments Off on Free Inhabitant One A, INTRO

Dedicated to –   God – Family – Country

Titled Presentation:  Free Inhabitant One A

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HtpPMynE5o

Topic-Why US written laws are constitutionally limited to “only” land owned by the Federal government.  Example of a few written laws are: speeding and parking tickets, property tax, US, City, State, Statutes, all US courts rulings , judgments, orders, etc. This presentation is an essential step in understanding how, and why, the English Common Law courts must be utilized if one wants a fair trial.

(45 Minute presentations, sixty four+ slides, MP3 audio, 14 page student script.)

–pauljjhansen.com (authors home page)

-See also- edrivera.com (source of main topic)

–freeinhabitant.info/?p=12 (For revised versions of this presentation as well as the development of others, instructions of how to operate PowerPoint, auto readers, or MP3 file, will be explained at this site.)     MP3 Player free software- **See below.

I Paul Hansen personally guarantee the product.

pauljjhansen@hotmail.com Message box  – 402-541-6023 Omaha, Nebraska

Send comments and recommendations, the pertinent ones will be listed, by topic, under the titled presentation page at freeinhabitant.info.

This page is not part of the audio presentation; make a copy of this one INTRO page for each person in the audience.

I request a one time fee of 5 dollars for the delivery of this presentation by me to you by email.  You have permission to show the Presentation to anyone at no cost.  Please do not give the presentation out to others; each order has an internal tracking identifier.   Do encourage the audience to visit freeinhabitant.info for placing there own orders and donations.  If you are so lead, ask for a one dollar donation to be considered from each one in the audience.

I ask is that you encourage others to order their own copy for the 5$ directly from me so they can present it to their friends and family.  This is only one of a series of presentations available; contact me for all past and new presentations available.

To order email a request to – pauljjhansenLAW@hotmail.com – and ask for presentation “FREE INHABITANT ONE A”,

(As of 7-22-2011 the above PPT is available for immediate delivery by ‘Emailing’ or ‘DropBox’ delivery.)

Copyright   ©   2011 All Rights Reserved, RKF6301958A

Reproduction and presentation only as allowed per agreement.

** Download Now (50.98 Mb) Creative-MediaSource-Player or

** http://www.filecluster.com/Audio-Video/Utilities-Plug-ins/Download-Creative-MediaSource-Player-Organizer.html

((Some add the page below by copying it to the back of this page for the audience to have. Just shrink it to fit on one page.))

Many lawyers that have see this presentation have said; “this is possibly the most important presentation of true law in the last 200 years, for it changes everything.”

>>>>

Slide One of Sixty:   (This is only page one (1.) of the presentation as an introduction.)

Welcome to Free Inhabitant.info, a site designed to give sound foundational evidence of the limitations of law, my name is Paul John Hansen, I am the author of this presentation,

I live in Omaha, Nebraska. And I have been a student of law for over 15 years and have been in court more than 200 times for a wide range of my own personal legal matters, consisting of both civil and criminal cases.

I have assembled this presentation, titled as “FREE INHABITANT ONE A” in hopes that it will be presented to many for the furtherance of understanding of the difference from a free inhabitant and a United States Citizen, as the terms are used in Article 4 of the Articles of Confederation of 1777.

The primary topic that will be covered by this presentation discloses the difference between land that is owned by the United States of America and governed by the Unite States written law, and known as the United States Code, and conversely land that is not owned by the United States of America and is not governed by the said United States written code.

Other topics briefly discussed in this presentation are:

  1. Licensed Attorneys only have permission to practice law on land owned by the USA.
  2. The legal difference between the United States of America and the United States.

I ask that the presentation stay in its virgin form and that all requested changes be reported to me personally so that the presentation or like presentations will continually be improved and all paid customers can have access at no cost to the changes of the improved versions.  Please inform me of any errors of any type in this presentation.

The presentation is a Microsoft POWER POINT.

Do study.. edrivera.com, it is a large site written by a dis barred, attorney for successfully using these arguments in the United States administrative courts.

I am a paid member of his class for a one time fee of fifty dollars.

Do be generous and make the small donation of five dollars for the hundreds of hours it takes to prepare, distribute, and improve such material as this for the good of our nation.

When presenting this to a group I ask that you give each one in the audience a copy of the INTRO PAGE, so they can have an opportunity to donate and continue passing the message to others.  As new presentations are prepared they will be available for viewing at free inhabitant.info.   The main subject of this presentation has been said by various attorneys and law professors, as the most important find of the last 200 years of America’s history.

This presentment is in text voice because the contents are improved daily and it is next to impossible to make such improvements any other way.  Several words are misspelled in the text to work better with the reader software.  Serious students often down load the text document and follow it word for word for better comprehension, and retention…….

>>

Customer Comments:

Paul,       First let me say again, that I am so pleased with your Free Inhabitant One A, Territorial PP Presentation etc.   It really helps me to put things in a bit of order for learning, Dr. Rivera’s Material.  You have helped to encapsulate the material in an orderly, and understandable way.  Excellent!!  Nathan L.,  N Myrtle Beach, SC

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Free Inhabitant Index

Posted: 21st June 2011 by admin in Free Inhabitant Index
Tags:
Comments Off on Free Inhabitant Index

Free Inhabitant One A – 45 minute, 64+ slides, Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation, with MP3 voice/text.   Main Topic: The “exclusive Legislative Authority” of the United States written law.  Why US written law, such as property tax, may not apply to you.          A suggested required class before all other presentations.             To Order >  5$  

NOTICE – 3-24-14 – Due to recent difficulties with Paypal send all payment by mailing money orders payable to Paul John Hansen, mailing address 1548 N 19, Omaha, NE 68110.

Free Inhabitant Two –  xxxx

Free Inhabitant Three – xxxx

Free Inhabitant Four – xxxx

Free Inhabitant Five – xxxx

Free Inhabitant Six – xxxx

Free Inhabitant Seven – xxxx

 

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Hovind Letter, 6-10-2011, Notice Attorney General

Posted: 11th June 2011 by admin in Exclusive Legislative Authority, Hovind's Defense, Territorial jurisdiction
6

NOTICE

TO: Robert Stinson, USA Attorney, Tallahassee, Suite 400, 111 N Adams St.,  Florida, 32301

CC TO: Attorney General, Pam Bondi, State of Florida, The Capitol PL-01, Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050

FROM: Paul John Hansen, Trustee, Counsel for Kent Hovind, 1548 N 19, Omaha, Nebraska, without the United States.  402-957-2853

RE: Notice of Violation of Written Law

The United States of America has claimed that Kent Hovind violated various US Codes, to which he received a ten+ year sentence by THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION, Case No.: 3:06cr83/MCR

This is a Notice of the violation of the acting Attorney(s) as to practicing law outside of their licensed jurisdiction, for a licensed attorney only has permission to practice law within the United States.

As there is no evidence, that the acts that Kent Hovind was accused of doing, occurred on land that was owned by the United States of America at the time of the alleged crime.  Or the subject land as addressed hereafter is in the same said jurisdiction of the US court, USC.

All US written law have force derived from permission, as associated with proprietary right.  All US written law is exclusively legislated for specific land, that being land owned by the United States of America and lacks such written permission to be enforced on land not owned by the United States of America. Said fact can not be altered or affected by any court, plaintiff, or defendant.

No sustainable evidence exist that supports that Kent Hovind is a type subject to any US written law when occupying land not owned by the United States of America.

All written laws have territorial limitations and the United States is no different from any other government in that respects (a jurisdictional component).  You, as a/the USA Attorney MUST understand that statement because not only is this your job, you have taken an oath to uphold the written laws of the United States at all times.  Your profession requires that you obey the written laws AND its limitations regardless of the implications that the truth may have on you.

You are licensed to practice law ONLY in the United States and this is something that you may have overlooked in the past, but you can no longer ignore because I am bringing it to your attention right here and right now.

What is relevant remains the fact that you are now informed that you are, have been, practicing law outside of the territorial jurisdiction of the United States and as such have been providing legal advice to your client / employer, to act outside of the United Sates, is a clear violation of the standards contained in the Rules of Professional Conduct of the Association from whom you derive your license to practice law.

“ Florida Rules of Professional Conduct

3 RULES OF DISCIPLINE
3-3 JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE RULES

RULE 3-3.1 SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA; DISCIPLINARY AGENCIES

“The exclusive jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of Florida over the discipline of persons admitted to the practice of law shall be administered in the following manner subject to the supervision and review of the court.

Rule 4-1.2 Scope of Representation

(d) Criminal or Fraudulent Conduct

A lawyer shall not counsel a client to engage, or assist a client, in conduct that the lawyer knows or reasonably should know is criminal or fraudulent.

Rule 4-5.5 Unauthorized Practice of Law

A lawyer shall not:

(a) practice law in a jurisdiction where doing so violates the regulation of the legal profession in that jurisdiction; or

(b) assist a person who is not a member of the bar in the performance of activity that constitutes the unlicensed practice of law. ”

Representing the United States of America, the Confederacy, interests is always important but your duty to obey all the written laws of the United States is paramount and demands truthfulness from you regardless of the requests of your client.

The Organic Laws of the United States of America are still positive law and the territorial limitations have been clearly explained and demonstrated in written law so you have no excuse for ignorance of that law.  Ignorance of the law is no excuse for professional legal counsel in any case but you have now been informed by us/me in writing as to your violations of written law and my demand for your acknowledgement of the truth about the laws that bind you as an officer of the court and a licensed attorney. You permission is limited by written law, period.  For you to prove otherwise is futile.

Inform your client of the truth and instruct them accordingly as the written laws of the United States and Rules of Professional Conduct dictate you do.   This is to be done before June 22, 2011, for your involvement in the sale of two homes that rightfully remain a possession of two Trusts that I manage. The subject properties are addressed, by you as, 5720 North Palafox Highway, and, 5800 block North Old Palafox Street, both of Pensacola, Florida.

You have advised the United States of America and a United States Court to apply the US Code to land not subject to that written law, in conjunction where your license to practice law does not reach.  Stop the damage now, correct this error immediately.

People such as Kent and Jo Hovind, as well as the said Trusts, that are domiciled outside of the land owned by and under the exclusive legislated jurisdiction of the United States of America have all the rights and immunities as citizens but are/as free inhabitants, not citizens (subjects) of the United States and its written law.  Kent or Jo, or the Trusts, have never resided, or done acts, in the United States therefore you can not prove they are subject to the U.S. written law, or within the scope of your licensed authority to practice law.

Article IV free inhabitant are a fact of life, and you must accept the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 as positive law pursuant to the adoption of these articles and demonstrated in the Organic Laws of the United States of America.  Such written law exists to prevent the very actions that your personal acts have accomplished, yet all done outside of the clearly written law.   Wow to those, says the Bible, whom do such acts intentionally.

This NOTICE / Declaration in written form is simply further evidence of our status and a notice to all who may be reading this letter as to the facts of law already established in the Organic Laws which can easily be found in Volume 1 of the United States Code, Titles 1-5.  May I suggest you purchase a copy for your law library if you do not already own one.  Verify this for your own professional edification and that of your associates.  A reply from you as the USA Attorney is not necessary, but is advised, to evidence these facts of law presented to you.  Consider this consorted notice given to you, in your capacity as an Attorney for the United States of America regarding your inability to practice law in that capacity / location as a Bar licensed attorney.

The governments of the States are proprietary governments possessing authority over the Federal lands located within the outer boundaries of the states and are called, for purposes of distinction, “The State(s) of …”  All proprietary jurisdiction is limited by statute found in Chap 5 of Title 28 of the United States Code to the land owned by and ceded to the United States of America and the subject Land from which you arrested Kent and Jo Hovind, is not land owned by or ceded to the United States of America.  Surly you have been trained to look to see if the swimming pool is full of water before you dive-in, or throw someone else in.  All acts done without Legislative permission leaves one standing alone with no immunity.

I can only conclude that your acts against the said Land in Trust and the Hovind’s were/are based on assumed “exclusive Legislative” “Authority” (jurisdiction) as to land “owned”, “Places purchased” or “ceded” to the United States of America, generally called USA Land, pursuant to Article I, Section 8, (par.17) USA Const. 1787.  Now if the bridge is out a motorist best stop and turn around.  Your attack upon the Trusts and the Hovind’s lack such Legislative permission.  And do you believe you could withstand direct examination as to your claimed jurisdiction.  The written law is a picture, worth a thousand word, how can it be disputed.

We are providing further evidence in the sections of United States Code referenced below to reinforce the facts of law provided in the Organic Laws of the United States of America.  In Chap 5 of 28 U.S.C., you will find the following under Historical Notes and revisions as cited in positive law as of January 1, 1945.

HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES

Sections 81-131 of this chapter show the territorial composition of districts and divisions by counties as of January 1, 1945. All references to dates were omitted as unnecessary.

Sections 81 through 131 are the names of 48 States, two territories, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico.  The astute attorney (reader) should notice that “Sections 81- 131” produce 51 Sections — one short.  Alaska, the territory on January1, 1945, is Section 81A.  There are 52 Districts on January 1, 1945 and there were 13 Districts on September 24, 1789 the date of the first Judiciary Act, when only 11 States had ratified the Constitution of September 17, 1787.  On the date of the Judiciary Act of 1789 there was no mention of territorial composition because there was NO territory owned by the United States of America in any of the 11 States, which had ratified that Constitution.  By January 1, 1945, the United States of America had purchased / acquired some territory in each of the thirteen original States and retained substantial territory in each of the remaining 35 States.  The United States of America owned some territory in Alaska, Hawaii and Puerto Rico and was ceded all jurisdictions there on January1, 1945.  “Sections 81 – 131 of this chapter show the territorial composition of districts and divisions by counties as of January 1, 1945,” so each “Section” from 81 to 131 will show the territorial composition of every class of “District.”  It follows that each of the 48 States will contain territory equal to Section 88 District of Columbia, which consists of territory owned by and under the exclusive legislated jurisdiction of the United States of America otherwise known as U.S. government owned property or in its simplest form of the English language, federal territory.   See as 89. Florida.

The Constitution referred to in the Declaration of Independence must be an unwritten one, for no one has seen it, but so must the law on the subject Lands be unwritten.  The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the land and the Constitution of the State of California, for example, presuming the same for the State of Florida, says so in Article 3 Section 1:  “The State of California is an inseparable part of the United States of America, and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land.”  So the State of Florida is only land owned by the United States of America, a composition of land comparable to the District of Colombia, USA / Confederacy owned land.

The term “United States” is not the result of sloppy writing by English law experts who just happened to be writing a constitution.  The context that determines the different meanings of the term “United States” is the entire Organic Law of the United States of America.   The so-called Framers of the Constitution of 1787 intended the confusion we have with government today and that confusion can only be resolved by confronting those who are claiming power under that instrument.

I have now explained in detail what you, as a licensed attorney and professional legal adviser should already know about the written laws that bind you as an officer of the court and government employee in the contracted capacity as Attorney for the United States of America.  The rest is up to you US Attorney, Robert Stinson, and I thank you for allowing me to clarify this legal obligation for you to tell the truth and not hide behind attorney-client privilege as this so called “privilege” is exempt in this case due to the criminal and fraudulent nature these facts of law expose to the private sector, and public at large, and to you as well, as to the regulating body of your legal profession known as the Florida State Bar Association.   What constitutes the US Constitution?  Answer US Land, US Law, US People, strike three.

____________________   June 11, 2011

Paul John Hansen, as Kent Hovind counsel, and Trustee of subject Trust property.

Cc – ____________________________________________________________________

Mailing witnessed by:________________________________________ Affidavit.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

USA lacking Standing as Owner

Posted: 31st May 2011 by admin in Territorial jurisdiction
Comments Off on USA lacking Standing as Owner

On June 6-22-2011 the USA Treasury Department intends to sell 5720 North Palafox Highway and 5800 block North Old Palafox Street, Pensacola, Florida.  The USA is currently recorded at the Registry of Deeds as the legal owner, pursuant to US Court Order, this notice is to inform all that the Record is incorrect.  No US court can go beyond its “exclusive Legislative” authority pursuant to Article I, Section 8, (par.17) USA Const. 1787, and is only limited to land owned by the USA pursuant to 28 USC CHAPTER 5, Sec.89. Florida.  Both described properties for sell are owned by the Trusts as were of record January 2009.  Upon investigation one may find that the sale will be AS-IS, this meaning if the USA is not legal owner it has no right to sell title, the purchaser then gets what he paid for, that being a mere belief of purchase with no right to possess.  Challenge to any owner of the described land must take place before a court with territorial jurisdiction, of which the US proprietary administrative courts are not.  Paul John Hansen as Trustee,  SEE more at >   freeinhabitant.info.

The above was published in the Pensacola News Journal 10 days before the intended sale date of 6-11-2011.

>>>>

Legal Brief:

Does the USA have authority to apply US written law, or court order, on land the USA does not own, or upon a free inhabitant absent a US license?

As many have witnessed the USA attacked Kent Hovind for not following US written law.

Now for a brief introduction of what few know- USA is a confederacy of states, and the US is the land owned by the Confederacy we call the USA.

  • See>  The USA Constitution – Articles of Confederation, 1777, Article I. The stile of this confederacy shall be, “The United States of America.”
  • and
  • Title 28 USC. PART VI CHAPTER 176 SUBCHAPTER A § 3002(14) (15)(A): (15) “United States” means—   (A) a Federal corporation;   (Note that it does not state USA but only US.)

Now the question now is on what land does this “Federal corporation” law apply?  The answer is found at the following:

  • “To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession (D.C.) of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings; And”     Article I, Section 8, (par.17) US Const. 1787

As you see it is limited to “District” / “Places purchased”, now what do these two have in common, they are both land owned by the USA.

You may have heard the rumor that the US Government is to big.  Well maybe it is not because the said Federal corporation owns very little land in Florida, and there is absolutely no evidence that they own any land that Kent Hovind was accused of doing any acts on. So we see for the US to impose its written law on land they do not own is actually a violation of that corporations jurisdiction.  Withstanding that Kent Hovind was not acting under any Federal license, which is clear.  Their written law says that US “Legislative” (LAW) is to be “exclusive” to what they own.  See EDRIVERA.COM.  phd

Now how can one know which land the US has this exclusive jurisdiction on?  Well they tell us in the following:

  • DISTRICT COURTS -CHAPTER 5 -MISC1-    Sec. 81. Alabama. 81A. Alaska. 82. Arizona. 83. Arkansas. 84. California. 85. Colorado. 86. Connecticut. 87. Delaware. 88. District of Columbia. 89. Florida. 90. Georgia. 91. Hawaii. 92. Idaho. 93. Illinois. 94. Indiana. 95. Iowa. 96. Kansas. 97. Kentucky. 98. Louisiana. 99. Maine. 100. Maryland. 101. Massachusetts. 102. Michigan. 103. Minnesota. 104. Mississippi. 105. Missouri. 106. Montana. 107. Nebraska. 108. Nevada. 109. New Hampshire. 110. New Jersey. 111. New Mexico. 112. New York. 113. North Carolina. 114. North Dakota. 115. Ohio. 116. Oklahoma. 117. Oregon. 118. Pennsylvania. 119. Puerto Rico. 120. Rhode Island. 121. South Carolina. 122. South Dakota. 123. Tennessee. 124. Texas. 125. Utah. 126. Vermont. 127. Virginia. 128. Washington. 129. West Virginia. 130. Wisconsin. 131. Wyoming.

HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Sections 81-131 of this chapter show the territorial composition of districts and divisions by counties as of January 1, 1945.

“Territorial composition” is a fancy word for what land the US courts administrate over.

So what we have here is – the jurisdiction discussed is “District” specific, now district can be a deceptive word, for it merely means territory.  So the 89. (District) Florida, actually means territory (land) in Florida owned by the USA, such as the District of Colombia is 100% owned by the USA, all there are living as tenants.

Essentially every court order against Kent Hovind issued  IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION, is lacking territorial jurisdiction and that makes every order void, of no force or effect, it can only have appearance of law.  Any party utilizing such order has no written law of support and has no sustainable enforcement ability.  Any claim of land transferred by such order is worthless.

Now the question that can never be ignored is, does/did the land that is in Trust, or where Kent Hovind was accused of doing an illegal act, is it of the same type as described where the listed “exclusive Legislative” (jurisdiction) exist of the US court.

This is a question that no Licensed attorney can ask and expect to ever function in the US court system again.  Why, because it took 200 years for the US to deceive people, of America, of its true, very limited, jurisdiction.

Simply put- the USA can not attack a man that has no license agreement with the USA and is not doing acts on US land, for such is not their jurisdiction.  You see a tremendous, constructed, travesty is being orchestrated against the man Kent Hovind.  This man was dragged from his home, forced before a US court that did not have proprietary authority/power, that is, they did not govern that land by right, as owner, and did not have a consented acceptance of any license from the USA or the US in which to enforce.

You see the US controls attorneys, Hovind’s “trusted” attorney failed to protect his client, but opted to keep in good standings with the US courts by failing to give notice of lack of “exclusive Legislative” authority to apply the US written law to land and a persons not subject, even though clearly noticed of the same valid defense.  You see kings, and organized governments, often hate any one to know they are outside of their jurisdiction.

The (four) Organic laws are found in the United States Code, in the very front of their book, and clearly include “independence”, yes independence to own land, make a living for yourself and others, all independent of others, that including independent of this said intrusive US Federal corporation.    See Articles of Confederation, Article IV,    note the AOC have never been repealed, never!

Yes Kent has been sentenced 10 years for doing nothing in violation of Gods law, man’s law, or in violation of any of USA / US written law.

People often hate those who exercise independence, without knowing that those few are the very same people that makes independence even accessible to anyone.

Independence can be found in the written laws of the USA, tell everyone, independence is a gift from above , to which who can put a value.

Independence is seldom found in this world for it is grasped for to late, by to few.

Contact everyone and tell them to do what they can to expose the unlawful horrific injustice the US Federal corporation has done to Kent Hovind, his family, and his ministry.

Paul Hansen                     (Acting as Counsel of law for Kent Hovind)

pauljjhansen@hotmail.com

>>

p.s.   Generally when a person purchases a property from a USA sale it is clearly sold AS-IS, often this notice is on the back of the sales notice handed out by the US agents on the day of the sale.  It is my experience that payment for such land under such notice is converted to a donation to the US Treasury, nonredeemable.  All you get is a contribution pat on the back as the land is still owned by the rightful owner.  AS-IS means just that. (Buyer be aware.) Good luck getting title insurance for  purchasing land from the USA that was not legally possessed by the USA.  Why the US will probably sell you the London Bridge As-IS.

Now the claimed purchaser will have the burden of proof that the USA sold land it legal owned, the holding Trusts will not have to prove anything.  If the purchaser can twist the above US written law to prove ownership he is a far better lawyer than me.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Newer Entries