Free Inhabitant

Mayor of Omaha, Sheriff of Douglas County, Govenor of Nebraska

Posted: 22nd November 2011 by admin in Travel Rights

Comments Off

To: Mayor of the City of Omaha Mayor Jim Suttle, Date Mailed 10-10-2011

1819 Farnam Street, Suite 300, Omaha, NE 68183

To: Douglas County Sheriff, Tim Dunning

3601 N 156th Street

Omaha, Nebraska 68116

To: Dave Heineman, Office of the Governor, P.O. Box 94848
Lincoln, NE 68509-4848

From: Paul John Hansen

1548 N 19, Omaha, NE 68110, without the United States.

NOTICE

I have written several letters, addressing this topic, and as of this date, I have not received even one letter back from the above UNITED STATES INC. employees, even though I provide an enclosed, post-paid, return envelope addressed to me for ease of reply.

Again:

The City of Omaha Police, Douglas County Sheriff Deputies, and the State of Nebraska State Patrol, all constantly stop me and demand that I get a STATE operators license, also get STATE approved liability coverage for my automobile, and get a DOUGLAS COUNTY vehicle registration with STATE plates, when I travel on free open passage ways (easements) that they patrol, that is all land not owned by the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and is therefore not of the land that is of the UNITED STATES and its proprietary Legislative power.

I have no chose but to use a court of competent jurisdiction to stop the extreme damage that your employees are causing me as listed:

a. they produce warrants to arrest me without oath or affirmation as is required pursuant to the US const. of 1787, 4^th Amendment;

b. they do not allow me to right of travel with my private automobile on non UNITED STATES OF AMERICA land (for no right can be taxed / regulated / legislated);

c. they prevent me from providing a living for myself, and my loved ones, by prohibiting me from my God given right to traveling to and from my work with the said automobiles;

d. they threaten to arrest me if I exercise my right;

e. they instruct tow companies (tort-iouse conversion) to take my automobiles off private property (Land not owned by the USA), take them to an impound lots, demand a ransom, and sell them if I refuse to, or can not, pay the ransom money. They take the automobile with no court order, and with no association with any crime (felony).

f. your employees are causing tremendous emotional damage, also financial loss to the point of me being impoverished, and extreme social isolation.

g. you have been notified a number of times of both my “free inhabitant” and my “independent” choice pursuant to both the Article four (4) of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777, and the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776. All being written law as found in your present UNITED STATES CODE.

n I demand that you prove that my acts of “travel and ownership of my automobiles” that do not take place on land owned by the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and are not of the UNITED STATES INC., and are not involved in any criminal activity, how is it that they are within the limited “exclusive Legislation.. Authority” pursuant to the Article I, Section 8, (par.17) US Const. of September 17, 1787, and the “supreme Law of the Land” of Article VI , par. 2, of the same US Const, when all my activity is, in fact, on land, without the UNITED STATES.

n Liability is upon those who continue to act against my rights, after hereby being dully noticed, and upon the many prior notices, and of such persons are without official immunity, but are now personally liable for all violations, and subject to a common law remedy.

“Woe to those that do evil and encourage others to do the same.” – Jesus

____________________ Paul John Hansen

Record / Proof of Mailing

That on the 10 day of the 10^th month of 2011, at ___:___ o’clock am – pm, the signed, did mail, by US First Class, post-paid, to the above three addressed individual(s), an envelop, by digitally video recording the same, and all of its contents, being sealed, and deposited in an un-retrievable United States Postal Service Mail Box.

Video Title- _____________________________________________________.

Blue ink signature-______________________ Paul John Hansen

(Travel,Notice,Sheriff,Gov,Mayor.doc)

EXHIBIT “LL
Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Towing off Private Property NOTICE / BRIEF / AFFIDAVIT

Posted: 13th October 2011 by admin in Exclusive Legislative Authority, Territorial jurisdiction, Towing / Automobils / Private Land

Comments Off

[ City of Omaha, NE, Police and Inspector said they would tow it on 11-11-2011, it is now 12-12-2011, 30+ days, I see them drive by and slow down and look at it, but they stay away. Sound legal argument may be working at last. I am now going back and suing them for all the past violations as with towing. ]

To: Director, Planning Department, Attn: Administrative Board of Appeals, 1819 Farnam Street, Room 1110, Omaha, NE 68183. –and- Mayor of the CITY OF OMAHA, Jim Suttel. 1819 Farnam Street, Suite 300, Omaha, NE 68183.

From: Paul john Hansen, a Article IV (4) free inhabitant.

NOTICE / VIOLATION / AFFIDAVIT / BRIEF

NOTICE to Mayor is NOTICE to all CITY OF OMAHA Employees.

COMES NOW, Paul John Hansen, by right as an “free inhabitant” pursuant to Article 4 of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777. See attached Affidavit.

NOTICE- No right can be taxed, therefore no “Appeal / Notice” on my part can be barred by lack of payment, and must be received as NOTICE of your error as described below.

On the date of October 12, 2011, an Officer with Serial Number of 1340, name not being legible, did attach, to the rear window, a “NOTICE OF NUISANCE” on my Automobile that was/is parked on my private property, not on any easement way (Street) as associated with the same property.

Claiming it is subject to tow for Lacking:

a. Current Nebraska license plates,

b. not in Operational “street legal” condition,

c. Not parked on paved driveway.

d. 10 days Notice- if not corrected is subject to impound, and possible criminal citation. Listed Intended Tow date 11/11-2011 if not complied with.

Automobile being described as White Mazda RX-7.

Parked on the south side of my property (house) on a paved driveway with the west 10 feet being a paved brick drive (parking pad).

Unlicensed, unregistered, 100% working order.

The Land that the subject Automobile is on is as follows:

Legal description- As originally surveyed by the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / UNITED STATES- Section 15, Township15, Range 13, North West Quarter of Section 15, subdivided as SMITHS- LOT 4, Block 17 ½ VAC ALLEY ADJ & S 33 FT LT 3 & N 17 FT LT 4 BLK 17, all being without the UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES INC.

The subject land has no evidence as being owned by the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, pursuant to Article I. “The stile of this confederacy shall be, “The United States of America.” As found in the Constitution- Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777.

And therefore is not of the UNITED STATES INC., pursuant to 28 U.S.C. PART VI CHAPTER 176 SUBCHAPTER A § 3002(14) (15)(A).

And therefore not within the “exclusive Legislation.. Authority” pursuant to Article I, Section 8, (par.17) UNITED STATES Const. September 17, 1787.

And therefore not within the DISTRICT as numbered as “107. Nebraska.” Pursuant to Title 28 UNITED STATES CODE CHAPTER 5 – DISTRICT, as defined as a possession of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Therefore the subject Land is not evidenced as land under proprietary governance by the said USA, and it’s UNITED STATE INC. written laws.

And all my, Paul John Hansen’s, private land being protected as independent by evidence of the above listed “supreme Law of the Land” pursuant to the UNITED STATES Const. September 17, 1787 – Article VI , par. 2, of which all employees of the UNITED STATES INC. are subject.

That just as in the CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE 3, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SEC. 1. “The State of California is an inseparable part of the

United States of America, and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land.” So it is also as pertaining to the STATE OF NEBRASKA.

Being that the CITY OF OMAHA and its Omaha Municipal Code, Section 18-42 and 18-43 is a written law pursuant to its relationship with the STATE OF NEBRASKA, it therefore is subject to the limitations granted it by the said UNITED STATES Constitution.

Therefore being that the CITY OF OMAHA can not produce evidence that the subject described Land (Hansen’s Land) is not owned by the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (or its subdivisions) all subject listed acts against such Land are lacking power of written law and are null and void.

Therefore all acts, done by the CITY OF OMAHA, are in violation of it’s respective charter and are hereby noticed as acts in violation of “acting outside of its limited authority” and therefore damaging, oppressing, attempting to plunder without authority.

If notice is not sent to me before the date of 11-5-2011 that you have ceased from your intent to tow, I assess you the equivalent of seventeen (17) percent of one once of gold per day until I can safely keep the listed property, at the listed location, in the same listed condition, by written declaration from an officer of the CITY OF OMAHA.

Any person acting without authority derived by written law, under color of law, as to the UNITED STATE INC. is personally liable. SEE ink signed Affidavit as hereto attached.

Any UNITED STATES licensed attorney acting outside of the UNITED STATES is in violation of the same.

I will need the name of the person that authorized the towing of my / the subject Automobile upon the rejection of my position as found in the brief above.

**Upon notice, ignorance of the law can not be claimed.

______________________

Paul John Hansen

1548 N 19 Street, Omaha, Nebraska,

without the UNITED STATES, not a resident address.

Video Record / Proof of Mailing

That on the 14 day of the 10^th month of 2011, at ___:___ o’clock am – pm, the signed, did mail, by US First Class, post-paid, to the above addressed individual(s), an envelop, by digitally recording, in video, the same, and all of its contents, as written above, with supporting 2 page affidavit, 5 pages total, being sealed, and deposited in an un-retrievable United States Postal Service Mail Box.

Video Title- __Mazda Tow Challenge / Notice__________________________________.

Blue ink signature-______________________ Paul John Hansen

AFFIDAVIT

in support of the attached NOTICE / VIOLATION / AFFIDAVIT / Brief

1. That herein after Affiant shall mean the man Paul John Hansen.

2. That Affiant is 21 years of age or older.

3. That Affiant is a “free inhabitant” pursuant to Article 4 of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777.

4. That Affiant mailed this document and the attached NOTICE / VIOLATION / Brief on the ____ day of October 2011 to the Director, Planning Department, Attn: Administrative Board of Appeals, 1819 Farnam Street, Room 1110, Omaha, NE 68183, by post paid UNITED STATES Postal Service, first class, with retaining a digital recording of the same.

5. That on the date of October 12, 2011, an Officer with Serial Number of 1340, name not being legible, did attach, to the rear window, a “NOTICE OF NUISANCE” on my Automobile that was/is parked on my private property, not on any easement way (Street) as associated with the same property, addressed as 1548 N 19, Omaha, Nebraska, without the UNITED STATES. See copy hereto attached as EXHIBIT “AA”..

6. That the subject Automobile was parked on the south side of my property (house) on a paved driveway with the west 10 feet being a paved brick drive (parking pad).

7. That the Automobile is unlicensed, unregistered with the STATE OF NEBRASKA, and in 100% working order.

8. That the subject Land that the subject Automobile is on is as follows:

9. The subject land has no evidence as being owned by the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, pursuant to Article I. “The stile of this confederacy shall be, “The United States of America.” As found in the Constitution- Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777.

10. That the subject Land is not of the UNITED STATES INC., pursuant to 28 U.S.C. PART VI CHAPTER 176 SUBCHAPTER A § 3002(14) (15)(A).

11. That the subject is not within the “exclusive Legislation.. Authority” pursuant to Article I, Section 8, (par.17) UNITED STATES Const. September 17, 1787.

12. That the subject Land is not within the DISTRICT as numbered as “107. Nebraska.” Pursuant to Title 28 UNITED STATES CODE CHAPTER 5 – DISTRICT, as defined as a possession of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

13. That the subject Land is not evidenced as land under proprietary governance by the said UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and it’s UNITED STATE INC. written laws.

14. That Affiant’s private Land being protected as independent by evidence of the above listed “supreme Law of the Land” pursuant to the UNITED STATES Const. September 17, 1787 – Article VI , par. 2, of which all employees of the UNITED STATES INC. are subject.

15. That just as in the CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE 3, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SEC. 1. “The State of California is an inseparable part of the

United States of America, and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land.” So it is also as pertaining to the STATE OF NEBRASKA.

16. That being the CITY OF OMAHA and its Omaha Municipal Code, Section 18-42 and 18-43 is a written law pursuant to its relationship with the STATE OF NEBRASKA, it therefore is subject to the limitations granted it by the said UNITED STATES Constitution.

17. That the CITY OF OMAHA can not produce evidence that the subject described Land (Hansen’s Land) is not owned by the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (or its subdivisions) all subject listed acts against such Land are lacking power of written law and are null and void.

18. That all acts, done by the CITY OF OMAHA, are in violation of it’s respective charter and are hereby noticed as acts in violation of “acting outside of its limited authority” and therefore damaging, oppressing, attempting to plunder this Affiant without authority.

19. That Affiant has noticed the CITY OF OMAHA- “if notice is not sent to me before the date of 11-5-2011 that you have ceased from your intent to tow, I assess you the equivalent of seventeen (17) percent of one once of gold per day until I can safely keep the listed property, at the listed location, in the same listed condition, by written declaration from an officer of the CITY OF OMAHA.

And- Any person acting without authority derived by written law, under color of law, as to the UNITED STATE INC. is personally liable.

And- Any UNITED STATES licensed attorney acting outside of the UNITED STATES is in violation of the same.

20. That Affiant has notified the CITY OF OMAHA that Affiant will need the name of the person that authorized the towing of the subject Automobile upon the rejection of Affiant’s position as found in the attached Brief and this Affidavit.

21. That no evidence exists that the subject Automobile is *owned by the STATE OF NEBRASKA, CITY OF OMAHA, or the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA or the UNITED STATE INC.

-State of Nebraska

-County of Douglas

The foregoing _2__ page Affidavit with blue ink signature, was acknowledged before me this 14 day of October 2011, by the man Paul John Hansen , who is personally known to me, and who has produced appropriate identification. Also the above affidavit is executed *without the United States, I Paul John Hansen declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing affidavit is true and correct, as best of My knowledge. Executed on 14 day of the 10^th month of 2011.

Signature _____________________ , Paul John Jansen

_____________________________ Notary

Demand for Oath or Affirmation

Where applicable pursuant to the 4^th Amendment as found in the UNITED STATES Constitution of September 17, 1787, and/or common law.

I Paul John Hansen, as a *free inhabitant, was given an indefeasible title to my land, as described as: Section 15, Township15, Range 13, North West Quarter of Section 15, subdivided as SMITHS- LOT 4, Block 17 ½ VAC ALLEY ADJ & S 33 FT LT 3 & N 17 FT LT 4 BLK 17, all being without the UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES INC.

(mail addressed as – 1548 N 19, Omaha, Nebraska, without the UNITED STATES)

and I’m the lawful owner of the described land.

Therefore, if the CITY OF OMAHA is going to bring a claim against me or my property, you are commanded to put the complaint on a lawful affidavit, or there is no charge, and you will acknowledge that there is no charge and discharge it immediately! And to not do so would be considered warring with the Constitution and construed as Treason.

__________________________________

Paul John Hansen

Subscribed and sworn to before me, this 14 day of October, 2011.

Notary Seal: ______________________________________

Notary Public

* free inhabitant as found and utilized in article IV, Articles of Confederation 1777.

UNITED STATES CODE – TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 13 > § 242

Deprivation of rights under color of law

“Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.”

[[ I, Paul John Hansen, assuming that the above is a prohibition against the subject acts the CITY OF OMAHA intends to impose as related to the subject “towing” issue listed, for a US entity to act outside of it’s written law is naturally prohibited for the mere virtue of it has never being granted.

My choosing of independence from the UNITED STATES INC. is such a right.]]

*owner and owned- defined as right over the subject Land and Automobile and to use, enjoy, and dispose of.

If I am forced to move my property to hide it from your towing it will be damage.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

What All Representatives Should Know. ‘Limitations’

Posted: 4th October 2011 by admin in Exclusive Legislative Authority, Territorial jurisdiction

Comments Off

STATE Representative:

My law professor Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera teaches constitutional law as it should be taught. The Constitution is last of four Organic Laws. The reference in the Preamble to “this Constitution for the United States of America” means the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 was not replaced by the Constitution of the United States, so that all four Organic Laws of the United States of America must be read together in order to fully understand the last Organic Law, the Constitution of the United States. The third Organic Law, the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787, expressly established a temporary government for the territory owned by and subject to the exclusive legislative power of the Confederacy, the United States of America. If the Constitution of the United States is read as containing both a revision of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 and a permanent form of government for the territory belonging to the United States of America, the federal government is limited to making laws and collecting taxes for people, property and activities on that territory and nowhere else. The qualifications for the Office of Representative set out in Article I Section 2 Clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States makes it possible for an “Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen” to be eighteen years of age when he first became a “Citizen of the United States.” This has to mean Representatives must declare themselves to be Citizens of the United States of America and not just a Citizen of one of the States of the United States of America, where citizenship could only be attained at age twenty-one, the age of majority. Citizenship and the age of majority in territory owned by or subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States of America begins at age eighteen. The Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 permitted territorial governments “to elect a delegate to Congress, who shall have a seat in Congress, with a right of debating but not voting during this temporary government.” The States of the United States, Washington D.C., Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, America Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, are still restricted to non-voting Representatives until such time as those States are admitted to the Confederacy, the Union of the United States of America, where the age of majority is still twenty-one. Representatives such as you do not understand that the legislative power “vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives” is limited to the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States of America. I have successfully completed Dr. Rivera’s Basic Course in Law and Government and as an Advanced Student; I am sharing what I am learning with this country’s leaders. A correct interpretation and understanding of the Organic Laws of the United States of America limits federal legislation to the territory actually owned by or subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States of America. Civil obedience is the answer to America’s problems. Your Name and Signature

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

THE PEOPLES HOUSE, (TPH) Nebraska / Iowa- Law Forum Monthly Meetings.

Posted: 10th September 2011 by admin in THE PEOPLES HOUSE

Comments Off

TPH Agenda October 03, 201

The below are topic that Paul Hansen will be discussing at the above dated meeting.

To get on the monthly agenda specifics vi. Dropbox, send your email address to pauljjhansen@hotmail.com.

Common law jury pool: If you have an interest in joining a potential common law jury pool email me at pauljjhansen@hotmail.com to be on the notification list. No email addresses are ever given to others.

“The decline in courage has been considered the first symptom of the end.”

1. Talkshoe: Monthly meeting by internet, 20 plus people discussing current legal or court issues. If interested email me at pauljjhansen@hotmail.com to get on private notification list. No email addresses are ever given to others.

2. Oral Arguments: Property Tax. November 15, before Nebraska appeals Court. Take no chance to be arrested. I’ll call in if anything.

3. Notice of Gun Carry: Sheriff, Governor, Mayor. No response. California, Richard McDonald did it and got permission with no license. I have sent in the same notice.

“No Guns Allowed Story, Store Sign”. Ski-Mask-foiled again. Funny.

4. No Agreement to participate in the administrative proceedings. Myrtle- Property tax cases. Other house-

5. They Are Not Your Public Servants: They are US INC. employees.

6. No Warrant Issued: 9-9-11 Sarpy County Arraignment. As of 9-29-11 no warrant issued yet, clerk said that was odd. Expired Plates, Suspended License, No Liability Insurance.

7. Douglas County Refuses to give me statement that no warrant related ‘Oath or Affirmation’ is in the File Record. Two letters requesting with post paid return addressed envelopes, with digital camera proof of mailing.

8. Notary Assisted, Foreign Judgment: B & B Garage / Tow Company. (Anyone knows the owners name?) No court order, of private property, or safely parked. Sheriff became judge. “NO AGREE Paul Hansen”. 3 day window. FL. X-Judge.

9. NOTARY: Iowa, 30$ plus cost of stamp. (No Date on stamp! = reusable.)

10. Kent Hovind Forfeiture: Brief on Line.

11. Kent Hovind Quite Title Action: US Administrator (Court) had no jurisdiction to have title conveyance. Filed as a right, saved $945.00. Clerk said 16 years and have never seen it. 90 day to pay turned over to collections. Affidavit of poverty. Now attempting to have it moved to Federal Court…. Correct the Record – US Court had no jurisdiction.

12. PBS (Public Broadcast Service) Will not put it in writing of pauljjhansen.com, even though they promises to add it to there article.

13. Common Law Lien, 5$ per hour 24/7 value upon property. Successfully filed at Washington County Registrar of Deeds.

>>>

13. Steve Anders- Demand upon Court Clerk to bill in “Money of Account”.

Gold or Silver Dollar.

(Sell car for 10 dollars is that 10 gold or is it 10 silver dollars, which is it.

Money of Account “for” the UNITED STATES

Legal Tender

Supreme Authority U.S. Const. 1787, Art. 1, Sec. 8,10. “Law of the Land”.

Money of Account Coinage Act of 1792

Silver

Dollar

412.5 grains 90% fine silver. Coinage Act, 1792.

Gold

Dollar

1/42 troy oz. of gold. 31 U.S.C. 314, 821.

>>>

Lawful Money 12 U.S.C. 152

US Mint

Gold Coin of the US

Silver Coin of the US

>>>

All the rest is “Legal Tender”, which is not of the type of “money of account” that can be demanded when making payment upon dept demands by any agency / court / office of the UNITED STATES, yet can be received if not objected to by ether party.

Such as:

Any coin that is not gold or silver that is not of the specification of, or coined by the US Mint. Pursuant to the Coinage Act of 1792.

-Or-

Any script money.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The below is a presentment for the September 2011 meeting held in Omaha, Nebraska, at 6:30 114 Center Street, Garden Cafe conference room.

>>>>

Staying independent, and how to act when confront by a Government Officer when “not” standing on land owned by the USA.

Standing or driving on land not owned by the USA:

Officer- What is your name?

Hansen- Who are you?

O- A City of Omaha Police Officer.

H- How can I help you?

O- What is your name?

H- Are you ordering me to give you my name?

O- Yes.

H- By what written law do you rely upon that creates a duty upon me to give you my name?

O- If you refuse to give me your name I’ll place you under arrest.

H- It appears that this land is not owned by the United States of America. Have you been given information that this land we are standing on is land that a Legislature has given your employer authority to enforce written law on?

O- Your name NOW, or you are under arrest.

H- If you arrest me I demand that you take me to a Magistrate immediately for an examination hearing. Also if you have not fact evidence that this land that we are standing on is within the “exclusive Legislative.. Authority” of your employer, pursuant to Article 1, Section 8, (par.17) USA Const. 1787, your acts and all damages will be done in your private capacity.

O- I have decided not to arrest you, sign this ticket, for a promise to appear.

H- I do not wish to sign any document for such is a contract that I do not wish to consent to.

O- If you do not sign the citation I will arrest you.

H- If you arrest me my demand is the same as stated earlier.

O- You are under arrest.

H- Take me before a Magistrate that has jurisdiction over your district now.

A- Booking.

O- What is your name?

H- Take me before a Magistrate now.

O- We have your name off the documents you were carrying. Sign here.

H- Are we on camera? Take me before a Magistrate now.

O- Sleep well tonight.

H- I need a pin and paper to submit a habeas Corpus.

Before the Magistrate:

H- I have demanded an examination hearing at all times at the time of my arrest and was refused until now. The hearing was due me immediately pursuant to the fifth amendment, of the United States Constitution of 1787, ((nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; )) therefore is a due process violation, this court then lacks jurisdiction to hold me over for any proceeding and must give an order for release.

Judge- Prosecutor what do you have to offer.

Prosecutor- Mr. Hansen violated the law when in the City of Omaha, within the County of Douglas, within the State of Nebraska, and we have jurisdiction to hold him.

H- I challenge now that the Prosecutor produce evidence that I was standing on land, at the time of the arrest, that he proves it is land owned buy, or has been ceded to the, United States of America. I also demand that the individuals that arrested me, place on the record, all essential elements of his assumed authority to make the arrest and jailing me against my will.

P- “Everyone” knows Mr. Hansen was in the City of Omaha, within the County of Douglas, within the State of Nebraska, as the citation states.

H- This Prosecutor can not testify and be a prosecutor at the same time; I demand that he be sworn in so that his statements can be cross examined. If not I want this individual he calls “everyone” sworn in so that I can cross examine his claims. Also I want all statements that I object to, as stated by the Prosecutor, to be stricken from the record as evidence before the court, for he is bared from testifying as a prosecutor.

J- Mr. Hansen I have been at this addressed location and know personally that it is in the City of Omaha, within the County of Douglas, within the State of Nebraska.

H- I object, if you wish to testify, I demand that you be sworn in first and I be allowed to cross examine all your statements.

J- Prosecutor do you have anything else?

P- No your Honor.

H- I demand that I be released immediately for the arresting party has not proven that the land I was arrested on is of the type that is owned by the United States of America, which is essential for this United States Court to have jurisdiction over my acts done on that land.

J- Bond set at 500 Dollars.

H- What type of dollar are you demanding as a bond?

J- The same dollar that everyone buys food with every day.

H- I have never met this “everyone” person that is referenced, what type of dollar are you demanding, a silver dollar, or a gold dollar, or some other type of dollar.

J- Any type of a dollar do you want to pay.

H- Is this a United States court?

J- Yes.

H- Does the Legislative bodies that have authority over this court have written laws as to the type of dollar you must use as the “money of account” of this United States court as associated with court orders in bonds?

J- Yes.

H- And what is that “money of account” as associated with a dollar consists of? Is it gold or silver coin?

J- Mr. Hansen if I order you to return for a hearing, will you return as instructed.

H- I always return to a court that has jurisdiction as instructed.

J- Hansen shall be released on his own recognizance.

Hansen did not return, as instructed, warrant issued:

Hansen then immediately (or waits to be damaged by being arrested) and submits, by mailing, a Habeas Corpus, with out oral arguments, instruction the court to search the record for an oath and affirmation in support of the warrant that the court issued, pursuant to the 4^th Amendment of the United States Constitution of 1787. ((“and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation”)) If none is found the court is instructed to dismiss the warrant for the due process violation, and also dismiss the case as a separate motion.

The court loses all power to act, except to dismiss, due to the violation of the 4^th Amendment.

Generally one gets 10,000 dollars for false arrest, prosecutorial misconduct.

>>>

Notice to Douglas County Sheriff, City of Omaha

To:

Sheriff, Tim Dunning Mailed 8-30-2011

156th & West Maple

Omaha, Nebraska 68102

To:

Mayor, City of Omaha – Office of the Mayor
1819 Farnam Street, Suite 300 Omaha, NE 68183

To:

Governor, of the State of Nebraska

Office of the Governor
P.O. Box 94848
Lincoln, NE 68509-4848

From:

Paul John Hansen

1548 N 19

Omaha, Nebraska 68110,

without the United States.

Re: Notice of my intent to purchase and carry a hand gun with a rifled barrel.

a. Notice to all the above addressed individuals.

b. I intend on buying a hand gun with a rifled barrel, with approximately a 4 inch long barrel.

c. I intend on carrying it at all times with me for my own personal safety.

d. I’ll be carrying it only on land that is not owned by the United States of America, within the exterior boundaries of the territory (land) called Nebraska.

e. My lawful standing is a “free inhabitant” as the term is used in Article IV of the Articles of Confederation of 1777.

f. I ask for assistance, for I need notice of what lands are owned by the United States of America within the said Nebraska exterior boarders. Please provide the location of a Map that would clearly identify such United States proprietary governed lands.

g. I will be carrying the hand gun at times in a covered manner, from public view (concealed), and at other times in full view much the same as various government employees carry them on land not owned by the United States of America.

h. I write this not as seeking permission but as a notice, for in the past my conversation with many employees of the City of Omaha, Douglas County, and the State of Nebraska, I have been warned that to do such is against the law, and was informed I would be arrested.

i. If it is against the law to do such an act on land not owned by the United States of America, please give me the written law that supports such a claim.

j. Please verify if the following statement is true: The “State of Nebraska” consists of only the land within the exterior boundaries of the territory called Nebraska that is owned by the United States of America.

k. If I do not get a different clarification that what line “j” describes, it shall be deemed as true, and as long as I stay off of such land that the STATE OF NEBRASKA written laws do not apply to me in regards as my common right to self defense (hand gun), and independence from governance by such said STATE statutes (written law).

l. Also is it a violation of one or more of the four Organic Laws (constitutions) of the United States of America, sometimes called the United States, to apply self defense limitations by STATE statute upon lands not within the authorized scope (authority / jurisdiction) of the said entities.

m. Is it not a violation of various United States written laws, termed as “Oaths of Office”

to impose STATE statutory license and registration on those like myself who carry such defense devices (hand guns) when on land to which “exclusive Legislative..Authority” does not extend, as found pursuant to Article I, Section 8, (par.17) USA Constitution of 1787 as expounded in the below mentioned brief.

n. And is a common law remedy for “without” the United States appropriate for correcting such unauthorized expansion of written authority. SEE Brief at www.https://freeinhabitant.info/?p=40

o. I ask that the response to this letter be done, by an authorized employee, of each of the addressed entities, and signed in blue ink, for potential, future, direct examination needs.

p. I need an official document, from the above addressed entities, that in my acts of the above described intended measures for self defense, a document that I can carry and present to any of the employees of the listed addressed entities of Sheriff, Mayor, and Governor, to clearly inform such employees that as long as I am not on land owned by the United States of America, that I shall not be statutorily restricted or molested in anyway, unless I am acting out a common law felony in the presence of any of the said employees.

Submitted by ____________________, “free inhabitant” Paul John Hansen

Record / Proof of Mailing

That on the 30 day of the 8^th month of 2011, at ___:___ o’clock am – pm, the signed, did mail, by US First Class, post-paid, to the above addressed individual(s), Sheriff, Mayor, and Governor, an envelop, by digitally recording the same, and all of its contents, being sealed, and deposited in an un-retrievable United States Postal Service Mail Box, all pertaining to this 2 page letter.

Video Title- _____________________________________________________.

Blue ink signature-______________________ Paul John Hansen

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Citation, Jurisdictional Challenge, Non-Consent + Brief

Posted: 27th August 2011 by admin in Exclusive Legislative Authority, Territorial jurisdiction

Comments Off

((Citation for No Registration/Plates, Driving under Suspended License/No Operators License, No Proof of Liability Insurance.))

–NOTICE– ( DM-1073443 ) Clerk is asked to “File for Record”, and return time stamped filing on my copy. Herein attached post paid, returned envelop.

To: Clerk, Douglas County Courthouse, 2^nd Floor, Hall of Justice, 1701 Farnam, St. NE. 68183.

From: Paul John Hansen 1548 N 19 Omaha, Nebraska, without the United States.

402-957-2853

This is to inform / NOTICE the STATE OF NEBRASKA (DOUGLAS COUNTY ), as an inseparable part of the United States of America, of the following:

Regarding- Uniform Citation and Complaint, DM-1073443, which is not an information, and not a summons supported by a sworn affidavit by the acting Officer.

-That no agreement for appearance has been made for fact reason: #1. At the stop I was not given full disclosure. #2. Nebraska law allows all contracts to be contemplated and given option to cancel with in 72 hours, and this I do now-

“I DO NOT CONSENT TO THIS OFFER TO CONTRACT AND I DO NOT CONSENT TO THIS PROCEDURE, as associated with the said CITATION”

-That State of Nebraska licensed attorneys can only exercise such permission, of the said license to practice law in the United States / State of Nebraska, on land that is in fact the State of Nebraska, as fact constituted land owned by the United States of America.

-That all State of Nebraska statutes only have force and effect of law on land that is within the exclusive Legislative…Authority of the Unite States of America (State of Nebraska). SEE Brief on reverse side.

-That State of Nebraska employee MARTIN No. 1899 could / can produce “no” evidence that all acts of this subject Citation were acted on land owned by the United States of America.

-That State of Nebraska employee MARTIN No. 1899, acted on his own authority, or by instruction, to deprive Me of my right to travel, as I was not violating anyone’s rights, as a “free inhabitant” pursuant to Article IV of the Articles of Confederation of 1777, while on land not owned by the United States of America.

-That if the State of Nebraska, or employee MARTIN No. 1899, upon being noticed of the standing United States written law that bars such enforcement at the subject location and continues it is an act of plunder and dereliction of an expressed limited duty, subject to the free inhabitants jurisdiction, and or an US military action.

-That all parties involved have a duty to work in concert and restore Me with complete confidence of free unmolested travel on such subject / type of land. Obey your constituted limits.

( Previous like NOTICES have been presented to the STATE OF NEBRASKA employees more than ten times. )

Mailed on 8-____-2011, to the above addressed individuals, by:

___________________ Paul John Hansen.

(Signed in Blue Ink.)

Regarding Case – Case No. _____Not Available______,

SUMMONS / Citation DM-1073443

“I DO NOT CONSENT TO THIS OFFER TO CONTRACT AND I DO NOT CONSENT TO THIS PROCEDURE, as associated with the copied CITATION”

Signature – ______________________________

-Sworn Service-

Digital proof of mailing, (archived) of the above three (2) page letter / NOTICE / Affidavit, the following was: Digitally recorded as mailed on the date of 8-______-2011, __:00 _m., addressed, post paid, the above exact copy of the letters / pages enclosed, sealed, deposited into a United States irretrievable mailbox, all on a digital recording to have proof of notice by mailing to: To: Clerk, Clerk, Douglas County Courthouse, 2^nd Floor, Hall of Justice, 1701 Farnam, St. NE. 68183. and Omaha City Prosecutor / Douglas County Prosecutor, 2 W Hall Of Justice. Omaha, NE 68183-0001, (402) 444-5290. 4 page Brief sent only to Prosecutors address. No consent also called in.

_________________Paul John Hansen

Paul John Hansen, a “free inhabitant” as found in Article IV of the Articles of Confederation 1777.

Mailing Location: 1548 N 19, Omaha, Nebraska, not a resident address, without the United States. 402-957-2853

-Nebraska

-County Of Douglas

The foregoing red ink highlighted instrument with blue ink signature, was acknowledged before me this 16 day of August 2011, by the man Paul John Hansen , who is personally known to me and who has produced appropriate identification. Also the above affidavit is executed without the United States, I Paul John Hansen declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on ____ day of the 8^th month of 2011.

Signature _____________________ , Paul John Jansen

_____________________________ Notary

Prosecutors Office is instructed to go to- https://freeinhabitant.info/?p=43 -for subject Brief, as proof of fact law, and contemplation of law, supporting the above independence.

General Brief- Where does the written law of all ‘State’ Legislative Bodies have force of law.

a.-The Written Law of the Land-

The written Organic Laws are the root foundation of all written law in America and limits all written law to the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America. All 4 Organic Laws, The Declaration of Independence of July 4,1776, the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777, the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 and the Constitution of September 17, 1787 are cited in Vol. 1 of both the United States Code (pgs. 43 to 71) and the Statutes at Large (pgs. 1-22) with the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 enacted as 1 Stat. 50 (pgs. 50-53) which are recognized as enacted positive law.

All States of the United States of America are like-kind to the State of California.

The State of California Constitution is the organic law and source of all written law for the State of California. Art. 3 Sec. 1 defines and recognizes that the State of California is subordinate to and subject to the laws of the United States Constitution as the supreme law of the land. Quote- “The State of California is an inseparable part of the United States of America and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land.” Art 3 Sec. 1 State of California Constitution.

b. –First District-

The first district was carved out of the former British landholdings, the territory of the United States Northwest of the river Ohio, acquired by the Confederacy as a prize of war with the signing of the Treaty of Paris on September 9, 1783 and established under the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787. This Ordinance established temporary government consisting of a governor, legislative council and House of Representatives for the Northwest territorial States of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin and part of Minnesota as a district awaiting admission into the Confederacy upon attainment of sufficient population. Pending admission, (Art. 4, pg 55, Vol. 1, United States code) made the territory a part of the United States of America subjecting the inhabitants and settlers to the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States in Congress Assembled to be taxed to pay the federal debt incurred during the revolutionary war. Paragraph 13 (pg 54 US code) established that all laws Constitutions, State and permanent government was to be established in all future territory subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States in Congress assembled. Its enactment as statute law as 1 Stat 50 (pgs 50-53 Vol. 1 Statutes at Large) on August 7, 1789 made the ordinance applicable to all current and future districts for all property owned by and subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States in Congress assembled.

Unlike these “United States”, the “United States of America”, the Confederacy, was created initially under the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776, which removed the English monarch and all English law except the Common Law and transformed the colonies into free, sovereign, and independent States, which recognized the nontransferable God given unalienable rights of all men elevating the status of the inhabitants to that of a monarch allowing them to be free and self governing.

The Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 organized the free, sovereign and independent states into a Confederacy or “perpetual Union” for the purposes of protection from invasion and for the allowance of free trade and commerce between the free states. The thirteen member States retained their sovereignty, independence, and every power jurisdiction and right under Art 2 and freed the inhabitants from any obligation of citizenship subject to government control by allowing them to be “free inhabitants” and enjoy what citizens call privileges and immunities under Art 4, when in the governing jurisdiction of the United States. The government, headed by the United States in Congress assembled was precluded from making laws for the people and the member states forever under Art. 13.

Both the Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confederation effectively eliminated any and all source of government power to make written law for Americans subject to the Common law forever with the removal of Great Britain following the Treaty of Paris ending the revolutionary war.

The Northwest Ordinance and the Constitution of September 17, 1787 restored, written law government, but “only” in the territory acquired by the Confederacy, first under the temporary authority of the Northwest Ordinance (mentioned above) and then under the more permanent authority of the Constitution of September 17, 1787.

The Constitution of September 17, 1787 made the temporary government of federal territory permanent when the first nine States of the Confederacy ratified and established “this Constitution” between themselves as the United States Constitution and the nine States that ratify, as the United States, which now ceded designated property to the Confederacy for government use under Art 7. The United States, then, is clearly not, the United States of America, but are, in fact, the consolidation of all the territory that is an inseparable part, owned by and ceded to the Confederacy, the United States of America.

Nine State ratification made permanent the House of Representatives established under the Northwest Ordinance and revised and implemented Articles IX and X of the Articles of Confederation to create the Committee of States renamed the Senate and the President of the United States of America.

The Senate, a manifestation of the old United States in Congress assembled, would combine with the House of Representatives to execute the powers of the United States in Congress assembled under the revised Articles of Confederation to legislate and manage the business affairs of the Confederacy and its territorial acquisitions. The President of the United States of America would oversee and protect the Confederacy and its administration of its territorial acquisitions by the Senate.

Both Congress and the President of the United States of America are created under the authority of the Articles of Confederation. Constitutional legitimacy for offices originally established under the authority of the Articles of Confederation would require those officers to fulfill age citizenship and residency requirements fourteen years after the Independence of the United States of America (1776) in order to execute and be bound by signature to an Art. 5 oath to support and adopt, found in the Constitution of September 17, 1787.

The election of George Washington by presidential electors as President of the United States of America on February 4, 1789 and his subsequent taking of a nonbinding Article 2, Sec 1, Cl. 8 oral oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States combined the Offices of President of the United States of America and President of the United States, a legislative employment of Congress into the un-adopted Art 2, Sec. I, Cl. 3 office of President and instigate a trend which permitted members of Congress and all other Constitutional government officers not to be bound by oath and institute a governing “corporation” to administer the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America under Title 28 USC 3002 (15)(A).

Title 28 USC 3002 (15) (a) “United States means Federal Corporation.”

The failure of Congress and any President to adopt the Constitution of September 17, 1787 aborted the Constitution and “Constitutional government” in favor of a “corporate Charter” called the United States Constitution and its Corporate entity called the United States in which the new United States in Congress Assembled ( Senate and House of Representatives ) would administer and legislate (make written laws) to all places purchased and ceded to the United States of America and its Corporate entity the United States for the erection of forts magazines Arsenals Dockyards and other Needful Buildings; And to make law for said United States corporation, its departments and officers thereof pursuant to Article I, Section 8, (par.17) USA Const. 1787.

Territorial properties sold by the United States of America or the United States to the general public remained under the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States of America pending admittance into the federal United States by submission and approval of a State Constitution by Congress in compliance to the United States Constitution followed by admission into the Confederacy, the United States of America with the admittance of 2 Senators into the Senate.

The approval and acceptance of a States Constitution by Congress forms the State government with the moniker “State of xxx” that acts as the land holder and corporate subsidiary of the larger United States corporation. The State government along with all entities created as subdivisions including all cities counties, townships, parishes, State, local and public agencies and districts pursuant to California Government Code Sec 8557 (B) and (C) in compliance to Title I USC Sec. 2 administers all places within their borders CLAIMED TO BE OWNED by the United States of America and having authority only over the departments and commissioned officers thereof. Admission into both unions therefore ceases the exclusive legislative power of the United States in Congress Assembled as to land in private ownership, but is/was retained as to lands still “owned” by the Confederacy.

c. -How the Statutes proclaim the distinction of where the State written law has authority.-

Example- The State of California Revenue and taxation codes define being “in the State” as follows: Quote- “In this State” or “in the State” means within the exterior limits of the State of California and includes all territory within these limits “owned” by and “ceded” to the United States of America.

Title 4 USC chap. 4, The States Sec. 110 (D) restates and clarifies what lies within those exterior borders:

“The term Federal Area means any Lands or premises held or acquired by or for the use of the United States or any Department, Establishment or agency of the United States and any federal area or any part thereof which is located within the external boundaries of any state shall be deemed to be (a) federal area within such state.”

Also: Nebraska Revised Statute 60-666, “State, defined (DMV) State shall mean a state, territory, or possession of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or a province of Canada.”

The conclusion is the State must be a “Federal area” and that being in the State means being in or on a federal area. The indefinite article (a) which I’ve boldfaced and underlined indicates that there is more than one type of “federal area” and in fact there are four known to me: Exclusive, Concurrent, Partial and Proprietorial. The consolidation of all federal areas acquired for use by the United States and any department, establishment or agency within the exterior borders of any territory or insular possession of the United States composes or constitutes the state.

I possess three reports by the federal government conducted during the presidency of Dwight D Eisenhower in which the current Governors own father Edmund G (Pat) Brown Sr. was part of a panel of State Attorney Generals that examined the issue of legislative jurisdiction over Federal Areas within the States by the Interdepartmental Committee for the Study of Jurisdiction over Federal Areas Within the States April 1956 (see attached). The Study concluded that acquisition of legislative jurisdiction was dependent on 3 factors pursuant to Title 40 USC 3111 and 3112 in which the head of a government agency must:

Acquire “ Approval of Sufficiency of Title” by the Attorney General prior to acquisition of Title, describing the purpose for which the federal government is acquiring the land. (40 USC 3111)
Acquire Title to the land in question.
File a “Notice of Acceptance of Jurisdiction” with the Governor “with extent of jurisdiction as he deemed desirable as to any land under his custody and until such a notice is filed it should be conclusively presumed that no jurisdiction has been accepted by the United States. (pg 10 paragraph 2 Jurisdiction over Federal Areas Within the States pursuant to 40 USC 3112)
Properties that are under proprietorial jurisdiction are held or performed in a government rather than a proprietary capacity ( pg 14 paragraph 2 Jurisdiction Over Federal Areas Within the State)

The United States Constitution as indicated in Art 3 Sec. 1 of the State of California Constitution is the Supreme law that is for the State of California because it identifies the State of California as that land and property in California owned by and ceded to the United States of America. The State of California must comply with federal law and show that the United States or the USA has acquired Approval of Sufficiency of Title, Physical Title to the land in question, and file a notice of Acceptance with the Governor pursuant to 40 USC 3111 and 3112.

State of California Government Code Sec 110-127 describes the territorial jurisdiction of the State of California over places that have been or may be ceded to purchased or condemned by the United States including lands acquired in fee by purchase or condemnation, military reservations, leaseholds over private lands or State owned lands and any other lands owned by the United States with jurisdiction continuing only so long as the land belongs to the United States.

d. -Limitation of United State District Courts-

This “Union” is of scattered Lands throughout the 50 (plus) states united, as “districts” as described in 28 USC CHAPTER 5- as found in the “HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Sections 81-131 of this chapter show the territorial composition of districts and divisions by counties as of January 1, 1945.” Now under close examination the compositions of such lands are to be of one type, and that type is land owned by the USA and under the described “exclusive Legislative Authority”. Land such as “88. District of Columbia.” which is of the same type as “95. Iowa.” And “107. Nebraska.”

In the final analysis, all written State laws are limited to matters involving federal territory and property belonging to the United States of America as indicated in the organic laws which are the foundation of all written laws.

As an example, a place where the City of Omaha Employees (Police) harass me by attempting to apply United State written law on Land that is clearly not of the United States: All parties receiving this NOTICE are instructed to begin investigation as to the type of Land the described Land as- Section 28, Township 15, Range 13, N1/2 of NW1/4, Lot 4, Block 10, Hanscom Place subdivision, all without the United States, sold by the USA Nov. 20^th, 1884 with Land Patent Certificate #5466, as legally described / located.

All City, County, State, written laws, within the exterior boundaries of Nebraska, is therefore only applicable, proprietorially, upon land owned by the United States of America.

All acts “not” done on land owned by the United States of America are “not” subject to United States Administrative tribunals (courts) without consent of this signed free inhabitant; all such claims must be as by oath and affirmation to create a permissible warrant. Hereby you are fully noticed.

Submitted by – __________________, Paul John Hansen

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Exclusive Legislative Jurisdiction Master Brief, Limitation.

Posted: 24th August 2011 by admin in Exclusive Legislative Authority, Territorial jurisdiction

Comments Off

General Brief- Where does the written law of all ‘State’ Legislative Bodies have force of law.

Click on the link below for my popular 45 minute audio presentation with 70 slides. > https://freeinhabitant.info/?cat=14

a.-The Written Law of the Land-

All States of the United States of America are like-kind to the State of California.

Quote- “The State of California is an inseparable part of the United States of America and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land.” Art 3 Sec. 1 State of California Constitution.

b. –First District-

The Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 organized the free, sovereign and independent states into a Confederacy or perpetual union for the purposes of protection from invasion and for the allowance of free trade and commerce between the free states. The thirteen member States retained their sovereignty, independence, and every power jurisdiction and right under Art 2 and freed the inhabitants from any obligation of citizenship subject to government control by allowing them to be “free inhabitants” and enjoy what citizens call privileges and immunities under Art 4, when in the governing jurisdiction of the United States. The government, headed by the United States in Congress assembled was precluded from making laws for the people and the member states forever under Art. 13.

The Northwest Ordinance and the Constitution of September 17, 1787 restored, written law government, but only in the territory acquired by the Confederacy, first under the temporary authority of the Northwest Ordinance (mentioned above) and then under the more permanent authority of the Constitution of September 17, 1787.

Title 28 USC 3002 (15) (a) “United States means Federal Corporation.”

The approval and acceptance of a States Constitution by Congress forms the State government with the moniker “State of” that acts as the land holder and corporate subsidiary of the larger United States corporation. The State government along with all entities created as subdivisions including all cities counties, townships, parishes, State, local and public agencies and districts pursuant to California Government Code Sec 8557 (B) and (C) in compliance to Title I USC Sec. 2 administers all places within their borders CLAIMED TO BE OWNED by the United States of America and having authority only over the departments and commissioned officers thereof. Admission into both unions therefore ceases the exclusive legislative power of the United States in Congress Assembled as to land in private ownership, but is/was retained as to lands still “owned” by the Confederacy.

c. -How the Statutes proclaim the distinction of where the State written law has authority.-

Title 4 USC chap. 4, The States Sec. 110 (D) restates and clarifies what lies within those exterior borders:

The conclusion is the State must be a “Federal area” and that being in the State means being in or on a federal area. The indefinite article (a) which I’ve boldfaced and underlined indicates that there is more than one type of “federal area” and in fact there are four: Exclusive, Concurrent, Partial and Proprietorial. The consolidation of all federal areas acquired for use by the United States and any department, establishment or agency within the exterior borders of any territory or insular possession of the United States composes or constitutes the state.

Acquire “ Approval of Sufficiency of Title” by the Attorney General prior to acquisition of Title, describing the purpose for which the federal government is acquiring the land. (40 USC 3111)
Acquire Title to the land in question.
File a “Notice of Acceptance of Jurisdiction” with the Governor “with extent of jurisdiction as he deemed desirable as to any land under his custody and until such a notice is filed it should be conclusively presumed that no jurisdiction has been accepted by the United States. (pg 10 paragraph 2 Jurisdiction over Federal Areas Within the States pursuant to 40 USC 3112)

Properties that are under proprietorial jurisdiction are held or performed in a government rather than a proprietary capacity ( pg 14 paragraph 2 Jurisdiction Over Federal Areas Within the State)

d. -Limitation of United State District Courts-

This “Union” is of scattered Lands throughout the 50 (plus) states united, as “districts” as described in 28 USC CHAPTER 5- as found in the “HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Sections 81-131 of this chapter show the territorial composition of districts and divisions by counties as of January 1, 1945.” Now under close examination the compositions of such lands are to be of one type, and that type is land owned by the USA and under the described “exclusive Legislative Authority”. Land such as “88. District of Columbia.” which is of the same type as “95. Iowa.” And “107. Nebraska.”

Submitted by – Paul John Hansen

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Common Law Lien, Stops US Court Theft

Posted: 5th August 2011 by admin in Lien / Common Law

Comments Off

http://www.pauljjhansen.com/?p=391

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Protected: Get State ID and Passport with no Social Security Number, Full Audios. M1Sp-44 (5$)

Posted: 4th August 2011 by admin in I.D., Pass Port, State I.D.

Comments Off

Impounded, No Registration, Jurisdictional Challenge

Posted: 4th August 2011 by admin in Exclusive Legislative Authority, Free Inhabitant ONE A INTRO, Territorial jurisdiction

Comments Off

Re: NOTICE / Letter to company that towed the subject automobile. Mailed 8-2-2011.

From:

Paul John Hansen,

Lawyer / Counsel without the United States,

1548 N 19 Street,

Omaha, Nebraska 68110,

not a resident address.

402-957-2853

To:

B and B Towing, or B & B Garage

Post Office Box 307

205 South 1st Street

Springfield, NE 68059

402) 253-2434

It has come to my attention that you were called by an individual, an acting Employee named Janda, badge number 1032, that was attempting to act for the Sarpy County Sheriff, of Sarpy County, of the State of Nebraska, which is an inseparable part of the United States of America.

Said Individual Employee, called Janda, did contact the addressed B & B Towing / Garage, on the date of 8-1-2011, of the Hour of 1038 (am), and then gave instruction to have removed / towed, a Ford F150 Truck, owned by Paul John Hansen, from an address location of 3005 Comstock Avenue, Bellevue, NE, private property parking lot, which at the time was open to free access, all without the United States.

This letter is a Notice that the subject automobile was towed without the instruction of the owner of the private land as addressed, and also without the Pickup Truck owners permission.

This Notice is to inform you to immediately contact me by the contact number as provided above and give me a time when and where you can meet with me and have the automobile returned to me, the owner, at a jurisdiction without the United States.

Be it noticed to you, that you took my property without a court order, warrant, or judgment of a court of jurisdiction, without permission of the Land owner of the location of the event, and without permission from Me as the sole owner, and at a location in which the Land is without the United States, and with out evidence of “exclusive Legislative.. Authority” from anyone involved pursuant to Article I, Section 8, (par.17) USA Construction of 1787, as found in the current United State Code.

I am an advance student of written law, the Noticed law that you are hereby given is of easy access to all with diligence of an imperial desire to know the fact truth of all Authority, or the lack thereof, as related to the subject matter of the taking of private property without lawful permission at the subject location.

The taking of my said property constituted damage to me of 100 United States Dollars, in equivalence as exchangeable gold, per each 24 hours, or part thereof, as each day that you hold my property without written authority from Me as the owner in possession.

The question is, can you produce fact evidence, sufficient to withstand an examination challenge, that the subject Land of all issues as related were and are, in fact, land that is of such a type as to be included in the following term as “State”: Nebraska Revised Statute 60-666, “State, defined (DMV) State shall mean a state, territory, or possession of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or a province of Canada.”

For if you can not prove such a fact it will stand as not existing, and if not existing you are fully exposed with no protection of law for all the damage done and possibly a criminal element can be proven before a jury with authority to impose deterrents.

The Bible advises one to know your opposition’s strength before asserting any demand. I assure you that my strength is equal to, or greater than, the written law that you may believed you were relying upon.

If the subject Land is not owned by the United States of America all believed passed authority to tow my property and hold it for ransom is nonexistent.

My challenge to you, for the burden is yours alone, to prove with fact evidence, that the subject Land (towing location) is owned, by the employer, of the individual, that instructed you to tow my Pickup Truck, and take it to another location.

NOTICE: THIS IS AN OFFICIAL COUNTER-FORFEITURE CLAIM FOR DAMAGES AGAINST THE ABOVE NAMED OBLIGATED PARTIES, AS WELL AS A NOTICE OF INTENT TO LIEN, AND IS INTENDED TO MEET ALL NOTICE REQUIREMENTS FOR ADDITIONAL LAWFUL ACTION AGAINST YOU/THEM SHOULD FURTHER PURSUIT BECOME NECESSARY.

The party that took My vehicle, by using their equipment, and their employees, for profit, stands fully responsible to return the property as instructed or face all consequences.

It is organized plunder to take that which is not yours with no written permission existing, from a court of competent jurisdiction, for your act, and it is sure going to be interesting to see the unfolding of who pays who what for such cooperation of constructive illegal acts.

See attached brief that supports the need for written permission.

___________________ Paul John Hansen

BRIEF:

Fact:

The subject Land as addressed above is without the United States / UNITED STATES INC., pursuant to 28 U.S.C. PART VI CHAPTER 176 SUBCHAPTER A § 3002(14) (15)(A): (15) “United States” means— (A) a Federal corporation;
No evidence can be found that the subject Land is owned by the “United States of America” as the term is used in Article I, of the United States Constitution, Quote; “The stile of this confederacy shall be, The United States of America.”
No evidence can be found that the subject Land is within the “exclusive Legislative…Authority” as the term is used in Article I, Section 8, (par.17) USA Const. 1787, Quote- “To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession (D.C.) of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings; And”…
Paul John Hansen stands as owner of the Pickup with claim of all unalienable rights afforded me as an Article IV free inhabitant by Ratification of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 and pursuant to the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776.
Said “Organic Laws” are located in Volume 1 of the United States Code, Titles 1-5 which is published every 6 years by the United States Government Printing Office. You will see the Organic Laws of the United States of America are provided for all Americans to see and are proven to exist long before any statute laws of the United States were written.
This acts as a notice to all government employee, or one acting by order, of any US government, that ignorance of the written laws that limit authority to the land owned by and under the exclusive Legislative (Law making) Authority (jurisdiction) of the United States of America is no excuse for ANY government or private employee / entity / person.
In Chapter 5 of Title 28 under Historical Revisions and Notes, Sections 81-131, the law defines and shows the territorial composition of the United States as of January 1, 1945, essentially what land the US written laws apply. Noting that all land outside of such districts is without the United States and such would include the subject land as associated with the above towing. No evidence exist that the subject Land is included in any listed District composition of land as described here. To which the moving party must prove to proceed in any way against me.

Digital proof of mailing, (archived) of the above three (3) page letter / NOTICE, the following was:

-Digitally recorded as mailed on the date of 8-3-2011, 11:00am.

-addressed.

-post paid,

-the above exact copy of the letters / pages enclosed,

-sealed,

-deposited into a United States irretrievable mailbox,

all on a digital recording to have proof of notice by mailing.

_________________Paul John Hansen

–NOTICE– (SC-101249) Clerk is asked to “File for Record”.

To: , Sarpy Sheriff’s Office, Sheriff’s Administration, Investigations, and Road Patrol, 8335 Platteview Road, Papillion NE 68046, 402-593-2288

To: Clerk, Sarpy County Courthouse, 1210 Golden Gate Dr. Papillion, NE, without the United States.

To: Govenor Heineman, Office of the Governor, P.O. Box 94848 Lincoln, NE 68509-4848

To: Mayor , Papillion City Hall 122 East 3rd Street, Papillion, NE 68046, without the United States. 402.597.2000

From: Paul John Hansen 1548 N 19 Omaha, Nebraska, without the United States.

402-957-2853

This is to inform / NOTICE the STATE OF NEBRASKA, as an inseparable part of the United States, of the following:

Regarding- Uniform Citation and Complaint, SC- 101249, which is not an information, and not a summons supported by a sworn affidavit by the acting Officer.

-That no agreement for appearance has been made for fact reason #1. No signature of contract agreement appears on the document. #2. “No agree” does appear on the document.

-That all State of Nebraska statutes only have force and effect of law on land that is within the exclusive Legislative…Authority of the Unite States of America (State of Nebraska).

-That State of Nebraska employee Janda No. 1032 could / can produce “no” evidence that all acts of this subject Citation were acted on land owned by the United States of America.

-That State of Nebraska employee Janda No. 1032, acted on his own authority, or by instruction, to deprive Me of my right to travel and hold, and use, my property (F150 Ford Truck) as not violating anyone’s rights, as a “free inhabitant” pursuant to Article IV of the Articles of Confederation of 1777, while on land not owned by the United States of America.

-That if the State of Nebraska, or employee Janda No. 1032, upon being noticed of the standing United States written law that bars such enforcement at the subject location and continues it is an act of plunder and dereliction of an expressed duty, subject to the free inhabitants jurisdiction, and or an US military action.

-That all parties involved have a duty to work in concert and restore Me with the possession of the subject Ford Truck immediately. Obey your constituted limits.

((SEE– Brief , US Law, and additional Notices on back, plus 3 pages of documents attached.))

See NOTICE of “No Consent” on the back of this document.

Mailed on 8-4-2011, to the above addressed individuals, by:

___________________ Paul John Hansen.

(Signed in Blue Ink.)

(OVER)

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Land Patent is fact proof not USA / Federal Land.

Posted: 14th July 2011 by admin in Land Patent

Comments Off

Hello Mr. Hansen, this is Nate Felton with the Bureau of Land Management returning your call. Concerning proof or documentation regarding federal issue or lack thereof. You can reach me at area code (703) 440-1511 . This is July the 14th. I should be in the office all day, you can, I think, just give me a call and you can contact me and give me the information regarding the legal Land Description and such as to the Section, Township, Range, and quarter, and quarter section, about the property and we will check our records and let you know we have, if we can provide you with a copy of a patent that conveyed that property out of Federal ownership, or whether or not that patent does not exist, which is then proof that the Federal Government owns the property.ral Government owns the property.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Free Inhabitant

Search Freeinhabitant

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Categories

Mayor of Omaha, Sheriff of Douglas County, Govenor of Nebraska

Towing off Private Property NOTICE / BRIEF / AFFIDAVIT

What All Representatives Should Know. ‘Limitations’

THE PEOPLES HOUSE, (TPH) Nebraska / Iowa- Law Forum Monthly Meetings.

Citation, Jurisdictional Challenge, Non-Consent + Brief

Exclusive Legislative Jurisdiction Master Brief, Limitation.

Common Law Lien, Stops US Court Theft

Protected: Get State ID and Passport with no Social Security Number, Full Audios. M1Sp-44 (5$)

Impounded, No Registration, Jurisdictional Challenge

Land Patent is fact proof not USA / Federal Land.

Social Connections

Recent Comments