Di-sin-formation that Government Relies Upon.

Posted: 21st August 2012 by admin in Tax

Comments Off

The biggest error in this clips discussing “There is no law that you must pay Federal Taxes” is that all requirement, if any, is entered into, or created, by contract between the United States and a willing, or more often uninformed, participant.

If you have a contract with me to mow my yard and the contracts says if you fail to do so that I get your car, there is no need for a law. The same is for the IRS, no law is needed only the existence of a contract. So all the IRS must establish is the presumption of mere evidence of a contract to prevail in a US Court.

If you are not an expert in Federal Rules of Court Procedure you will be destroyed if you allow it to proceed to court, read all pages as related to 6203 Assessment for a sure defense against the IRS encroachment upon your life.

Much of the information in this clip will guarantee a loss in court, it is such disinformation that Government relies upon to keep the truth from getting out. Few find out until it is too late.

http://famguardian.org/Media/MostAmericansDoNotOweIncomeTax.wmv

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

US Case Laws do not apply to “Free Inhabitants”.

Posted: 7th August 2012 by admin in Exclusive Legislative Authority

DRED SCOTT v. SANDFORD (1856) (19 Howard) 60 US 393

The words “people of the United States” and “citizens” are synonymous terms, and mean the same thing. They both describe the political body who, according to our republican institutions, form the sovereignty and who hold the power and conduct the Government through their representatives. They are what we familiarly call the “sovereign people,” and every citizen is one of this people, and a constituent member of this sovereignty. [404]

Streets and highways are established and maintained primarily for purposes of travel by the public.
[American Jurisprudence 2d Series, Volume 39, HIGHWAYS, STREETS, AND BRIDGES, § 227 Generally]
Birmingham Ry., Light & Power Co. v. Smyer, 181 Ala. 121, 61 So. 354 (1913);
Escobedo v. State Dept. of Motor Vehicles, 35 Cal.2d 870, 222 P.2d 1 (1950)
(overruled on other grounds by, Rios v. Cozens, 7 Cal.3 792, 103 Cal.Rptr. 299, 499 P.2d 979 (1972));
Yale University v. City of New Haven, 104 Conn. 610, 134 A. 268, 47 A.L.R. 667 (1926);
Smith v. City of Jefferson, 161 Iowa 245, 142 N.W. 220 (1950);
Terrell v. Tracy, 312 Ky. 631, 229 S.W.2d 433 (1950);
Brenning v. Remington, 136 Neb. 883, 287 N.W. 776 (1939);
Ex Parte Duncan, 1937 OK 155, 179 Okla. 355, 65 P.2d 1015 (1937);
City of Radford v. Calhoun, 165 Va. 24, 181 S.E. 345, 100 A.L.R. 1378 (1935);
Ex Parte Dickey, 76 W.Va. 576, 85 S.E. 781 (1915);
Park Hotel Co. v. Ketchum, 184 Wis. 182, 199 N.W. 219, 33 A.L.R. 351 (1924).

Above is just an example of how the unlearned person jumps with joy at using the above cases, when in fact he is often creating his own demise when relying upon them.
People who claim to be a “people of the United States”, “citizens” or “sovereign people”, or even the “public”, thinking that is freedom when the very opposite is true.
The above case law, and all like presidents, are exclusively for areas and people (public) governed by the same US Court that makes the ruling. Said courts can only make determination within there own jurisdiction and when one uses their case determinations one is giving a strong presumption that you are of that jurisdiction.
Being of their jurisdiction is just the opposite of being an Article IV (4) of the Articles of Confederation “free inhabitant”.
Bing a “citizen” (subject) is much the opposite of being a “free inhabitant”.
So all these people that go to a US Court and use US Case Law to attempt to prove there independence from the US governance / regulation is a full act of ignorance that is carefully manicured by the US system to gain governance.
Being independent means just that, when “not” on US Land one is independent of the written law of that same land. So when the US hounds jump their fence and invade non-US Land do not shout their case laws to ward them off. Such shouting is liken to standing in front of a high speed train and telling it to stop, you are going to get flattened. Instead give notice to the conductor he does not have authority on tracks not owned by the United States of America. Paul Hansen

Order my 5$ presentation found at https://freeinhabitant.info/?p=17.

The US has generally valid laws, the problem lies in that they are just applied to you.

The only “public” the US Court can address is generally only those that are on their land.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Another Property Tax Case Won, I say no to property tax.

Posted: 27th July 2012 by admin in Pay No Property Tax, Tax / Property

Comments Off

Paul John Hansen won another property tax case.

Case No. CIVIL 11-4161, Douglas County Court, Nebraska (2011) Case dismissed for lack of prosecution at plaintiff’s / petitioner’s cost.

The above is a document that is associated with a $50,000.00 property of mine. A private party purchased a Tax Certificate sold by the County. I challenged the jurisdiction, with brief, as I was instructed by a retired district court judge. The Plaintiff’s Attorney sat on the case for more than one year, without even one hearing. The case simply expired. (just as with the first case) To receive the brief that scared the Attorney off, just email me and I can forward it to you. Do order the 5$ “Property Tax PPT” Slides / Audio Power Point Presentation, see: Property Tax Presentation https://freeinhabitant.info/?p=56

Brief includes: a. Notice to Court of “No Consent” – “No Contract”. b. Notice to Attorney of his utilizing a state licensed without the united States. c. Brief describing limited authority of the taxing statutes as were relied upon by the moving party.

This is the second case where people walked away from the case, per instruction by their attorney, and I paid no property tax. Currently doing 6 others with the same process.

Four or five years ago I wrote a check for $20,000.00 property tax, that was the last one, then I learned the truth about who has a duty to pay a statutory tax duty.

If you do not keep the burden of proof on the moving party you will lose every-time.

For 35$ you will receive the following by Dropbox.com:

Property Tax Brief. Case Document Filings and Case Chronology.
Notice upon acting Attorney of his violation for practicing law under a State Attorney License outside of his jurisdiction, and attempting to compel his clients to pay him to apply State taxing statutes upon non-State lands.
Opportunity to purchase the “Property Tax” Power Point Picture / Audio Presentation for 5$.
Opportunity to purchase the “Free Inhabitant One A:, (Territorial Jurisdiction), 45 minute+ Picture / Audio Presentation for 5$.
Life long 24/7 access to all Property Tax case activities associated with my properties and my clients properties.

Purchase at > “https://freeinhabitant.info/?p=56”

or click below for full Case Challenges, Motions, Briefs, and Judicial Notices.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

“Forced” and “Free” can not mix, says Dis-bared Lawyer.

Posted: 15th July 2012 by admin in Tax / Property

PROPERTY TAXES AND GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES

Taxes on property are determined by getting a list of all taxable property, appraising each property and then apportioning the amount of revenue to be collected among the listed property according to the appraised value of each property.

Knowing how direct taxation works in the abstract only makes property tax collection a simple process in an absolute monarchy, where the concept of the king’s realm or domain makes everything and everybody subject to direct taxation.

Getting rid of the king, as the Americans did in the American Revolution, would have gotten rid of the property tax in America, if George Washington hadn’t stepped in and taken King George III’s place.

Washington became head of the United States of America on April 6, 1789 and head of the government on April 30, 1789 and that process has continued through the administration of Barack Hussein Obama.

All those Presidents have spawned a new “Multitude of new Offices, and sent hither Swarms of Officers to harass our People, and eat out their Substance,” who are now called government employees.

As was the case with all the king’s men, all government employees ultimately end up wielding the unrestrained the power of a king.

All over America cities are facing the reality of bankruptcy brought on by the mistaken belief the People and their property could be taxed without limit.

The new reality every municipality must face is the fact that the Declaration of Independence had it right—that taxation required informed consent.

George Washington fathered this country using deceit and military force. Now that we know how it was done we can stop deceitful collections and in the future allow no “Taxes on us without our Consent.”

Washington’s government takeover is fully documented in my “Basic Course in Law and Government,” which anyone can sample for $50. Graduates of the Basic Course can qualify to take the Advanced Course in Law. You can start your legal education, as every legal education should, with the Organic Laws of the United States of America. Contact Paul at pauljjhansen@hotmail.com and he will send you searchable Organic Laws along with information about the Basic Course in Law and Government.

(Paul Hansen has won several property tax cases recently, and is in court at this time on 7 more properties to win even more, the defense is simple, “ya have no evidence of written law that includes my land” jurisdiction.)

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera , Dis-bared Lawyer after 30 years.

((I was told by a lawyer that jurisdiction was greatly impressed on him in law school as tools to win cases, then upon practicing he was told by judges that such challenges in their courts will cause us to disbar you.))

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Private/Self Registration, Public/Access Record, Automobiles

Posted: 5th June 2012 by admin in Owner Proof, Private, Registration / Self / Vehicle

Comments Off

Below INFO is found at- www.https://freeinhabitant.info/?p=64

Private Registration / Proof of Ownership / Declaration of Standing / Ecclesiastical* Jurisdiction / Affidavit of Truth, all evidence with owner, possession being primary proof of ownership:
-NOTICE to All- Vehicle*/Automobile Information

001. Year- 2008, Make JIMSTAR, Model FIJI 150 Motorcycle, Color- Yellow, Chassis Number LJ4TCKPB58YO75344. Previous Owner- Jonathan Paper, 12722 Ridgeview Cir, Bellevue, NE 68123. NOTICE – Collateral lien for one-half troy ounce of gold, number 10-3-12-714-8940-a. Owner is a man called Paul John Hansen 1548 N 19, Omaha, Nebraska an address without the United States, being not a resident of the United States, of ecclesiastical* jurisdiction. For use not associated with transporting cargo or persons ‘for hire’, not owned by the United States or any state thereof. pauljjhansenlaw@gmail.com, 402-957-2853.
-and-
002. Year- 2001, Make Honda, Model Honda Motorcycle, Color- Red, Chassis Number JH2RE01041K201761. Previous Owner- LONNIE LARUE, 325 2nd St, Meadow Grove, NE 68752. NOTICE – Collateral lien for two troy ounce of gold, number 10-1-12-567-2345-a. Owner is a man called Paul John Hansen 1548 N 19, Omaha, Nebraska an address without the United States, being not a resident of the United States, of ecclesiastical* jurisdiction. For use not associated with transporting cargo or persons ‘for hire’, not owned by the United States or any state thereof. pauljjhansenlaw@gmail.com, 402-957-2853.
-and-
003. Year- 2002, Make Honda, Model Honda Motorcycle, Color- Red, Chassis Number JH2RD06062K001851. Previous Owner- BUSH KEVIN M, PO BOX 1001,325, ALAMOSA, CO 81101-1001. NOTICE – Collateral lien for two and one-half troy ounce of gold, number 10-2-12-714-8940-a. Owner is a man called Paul John Hansen 1548 N 19, Omaha, Nebraska an address without the United States, being not a resident of the United States, of ecclesiastical* jurisdiction. For use not associated with transporting cargo or persons ‘for hire’, not owned by the United States or any state thereof. pauljjhansenlaw@gmail.com, 402-957-2853.
-and-
004. Year- 1995, Make Ford, Model Taurus GL/SE, Color- White, Chassis Number 1FALP52U4SG241419. Previous Owner- JEFF WALLICK / BARBARA A WALLICK, RR2 BOX 280, OSMOND, NE 68765. NOTICE – Collateral lien for three and one-half troy ounce of gold, number 1-17-14-714-8940-a. Owner is a man called Paul John Hansen 1548 N 19, Omaha, Nebraska an address without the United States, being not a resident of the United States, of ecclesiastical* jurisdiction. For use not associated with transporting cargo or persons ‘for hire’, not owned by the United States or any state thereof. pauljjhansenlaw@gmail.com, 402-957-2853.
-and-
005. Year- 1996, Make Mercedes, Model E300, Color- Black, Chassis Number WDBJF20F7TJ002537. Previous Owner- DAVE BLOCKER, 103 N MAIN, WYANDOTTE, OK 74370-4002. NOTICE – Collateral lien for three and one-half troy ounce of gold, number 5-21-14-714-8940-a. Owner is a man called Paul John Hansen 1548 N 19, Omaha, Nebraska an address without the United States, being not a resident of the United States, of ecclesiastical* jurisdiction. For use not associated with transporting cargo or persons ‘for hire’, not owned by the United States or any state thereof. pauljjhansenlaw@gmail.com, leave message only 402-957-2853, and personal cell 402-541-6023. MORE
-Owners Private Drivers License / I.D. – https://freeinhabitant.info/travel-rights/got-my-kingdom-driver-license.htm
-and-

006. Year- 1995, Make – Chevy CHALLENGER, Model P30, Style-27′ MOTORHOME, Color- Blue/White, Chassis Number 1GBJP37N5S3302053. Title Number 16067290004, Gas, Previous Owner- MERTZ, RANDY & MERTZ RHONDA, 415 N 3RD ST. BOX 306, ARLINGTON NE 68002-0306. NOTICE – Collateral lien for three and 12.43 troy ounces of gold @ 1287$/oz., number 10-23-17-714-8940-a. Owner is a man called Paul John Hansen 1548 N 19, Omaha, Nebraska an address without the United States, being not a resident of the United States, of ecclesiastical*/Church jurisdiction. For use not associated with transporting cargo or persons ‘for hire’, not owned by the United States or any state thereof. pauljjhansenlaw@gmail.com, 402.541.6023. ADD MORE SOON
-Owners Private Drivers License / I.D. – https://freeinhabitant.info/travel-rights/got-my-kingdom-driver-license.htm

*vehicle defined: a means/device of carrying something < planes, trains, automobile.
*ecclesiastical defined: of the Christian Church.

The above document are carried with the vehicle to give evidence of owner, use, and independence, from the United States Departments of Motor Vehicles, governance by US written law.
Click HERE to view the list of foundation information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

>>>>

007. Year- 2007, Make – Suzukie, Model DL650, Type Motorcycle, Color- Gray, Chassis Number JS1VP54A572100864. Title Number 108169717 FL, Gas, Previous Owner- Jonathan A Poalto, 143 Windsor Plane, Gulf Breeze, Florida (near 37561) (Sold on Date of 10/25/2019). NOTICE – Present Owner is a man called Paul John Hansen, 238 South Egret Bay Blvd, #155, League City , Texas [ near 77573 ] an address of one of the People of Texas, without the United States, being not a resident of the United States. For use not associated with transporting cargo or persons ‘for hire’ / or commercial gain, not owned by the United States or any state thereof. pauljjhansenlaw@gmail.com, 2513628231. ADD MORE SOON
-Picture of bike and plate.

*vehicle defined: a means/device of carrying something < planes, trains, automobile.
*ecclesiastical defined: of the Christian Church.

>>>>

MORE, Registration INFO

Posted: 7th April 2012 by admin in Blank

Comments Off

005. Year- 1996, Make Mercedes, Model E300, Color- Black, Chassis Number WDBJF20F7TJ002537:

Picture of Owner in 2014:

4 picture, D.O.B. 6/30/1958, Male, White, 5 foot-8 inches, 165 pounds, Brown Hair, Brown Eyes.

Picture of automobile, and Chassis Number:

Title: Front Back, notarized, certified copy retained in automobile folder package.

Bill of Sale, notarized, certified copy retained in automobile folder package.

Power of Attorney of Mercedes, notarized, certified copy retained in automobile folder package.

Picture of Affidavit of owner, status, and jurisdiction:

Jury Duty / Qualification

Posted: 7th April 2012 by admin in Jury Duty

Comments Off

Edward X. xxxxx
PO Box xxx
Hayfork, CA 9601
____________________________________________________________________________________

US / County / District / State / Court Jury Duty / Qualification

March 12, 2012
Ms. Laurie Wills
Court Executive Officer/Jury Commissioner
Superior Court of California
County of Trinity
Courthouse – Court Street
PO Box 1258
Weaverville, CA 96093 – 1258
RE: Complaint Filed 02/21/2012
STATEMENT OF FACTS AND REASONS CONTINUED
Dear Ms. Wills:
With reference to your letter dated February 29, 2012, in response to my complaint captioned above, on page 2, paragraph 1 you state the following:
“197 (b) [“the Department of Motor Vehicles’ list of licensed
drivers and identification cardholders” is an appropriate source
list).] DMV information indicates that you are, in fact, a United States
citizen, domiciled in Trinity County, California.”
Continuing on page 2, paragraph 2 –
“You responses assert that you are not a citizen of the United
States, do not reside in California, and are not a resident of Trinity
County”.
As for page 2, paragraph 2 cited above, my original complaint page 3, paragraph 2 more accurately states the following:
“With reference to the California Code of Civil Procedure Chapter 1. Section (a) (1), (3), (4) and (b) I told Judge Woodward that – “With respect to my being a person eligible and qualified to be a perspective trial juror I rebut the presumption that I am a citizen of the United States, that I am a domiciliary of the State of California and/or that I am a resident of the jurisdiction.
Regarding your reference cited with respect to “the Department of Motor Vehicles”, the fact remains that all State constitutions are subordinate to the Constitution of the United States and “all people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights,” except when those people are on the property of another especially if the property belongs to the government.
– Page 2 –
Qualifications for “citizens of the United States” are set out in the 14th Amendment. Only persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” are citizens of the United States. The United States is, therefore, a place and the question becomes were you born or naturalized there.
The Constitution of September 17, 1787 requires Representatives to be “seven Years a Citizen of the United States” and Senators must be “nine Years a Citizen of the United States.” Both a Representative and a Senator must be “an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.”
Article VII of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 provides “for the Establishment of this Constitution between the States so ratifying the Same,” upon the ratification of nine States, which occurs on June 21, 1788. On that date, the States of Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Maryland, South Carolina, and New Hampshire become Article I Section 2 Clause 3 “the several States which may be included within this Union.” Article I Section 2 Clause 3 sets out the number of Representatives each State shall have in the Congress of the United States until “The actual Enumeration shall be made.”
On April 30, 1789, President of the United States of America, George Washington takes this oath of Office of President of the United States: “I, George Washington, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” “So help me God.”
Upon these facts, we can conclude the Representatives and Senators chosen after June 21, 1788 were Citizens of the United States of America though the Senators were not Citizens for nine years when elected. It can also be concluded that several States that constituted this Union, the United States, were constituted of territory owned by the United States of America and subject to its exclusive jurisdiction.
Citizenship is created by governments and written law, which according to the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776, are instituted among men to secure unalienable rights. Citizenship is a duty in service to freedom and not a pledge to sustain government.
The law of freedom in 49 of the 50 States of the United States of America is the English common law. A juror, who must be a citizen of the United States, is not free to judge or determine the law of the case. The citizen of the United States juror is bound to accept the law as it is given by the government judge.
All 50 States of the United States of America are bound to the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 and Article IV which guarantees a free inhabitant the same privileges and immunities of a citizen. This means that I am not obligated to claim United States citizenship and I may cease to be even if I were subject to its territorial jurisdiction.
Respectfully submitted,
Edward J. Guenette

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Sheriff Noticed of His Limited Jurisdiction

Posted: 7th April 2012 by admin in Exclusive Legislative Authority, Territorial jurisdiction

Comments Off

Sheriff Noticed of His Limited Jurisdiction, to all non-private land.

From: Edward x. xxxxxx
PO Box xxx
Hayfork, CA 96041 – 0157
___________________________________________________________________
March 15, 2012
To: Bruce Haney, County Sheriff
PO Box 1228, 101 Memorial Drive
Weaverville, CA 96093-1228
Dear Sheriff Haney:
Thank you for the letter of 12/21/2011 and please accept my apology for this belated response due in part to my taking time to research the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association which you mentioned.
In your reply you cite the U. S. Constitution, the California Constitution, the Government Code and the California Penal Code as the source(s) of authority which grants local law enforcement jurisdiction in the County of Trinity. On page 1, paragraph 3 with reference to Article 11, Section 1(b) of the California Constitution and the Government Code Section 24000 you state, “A county has a definite geographic area which can also be defined as jurisdiction” and continuing, “Again, a county has a definite geographic area or jurisdiction that is the law enforcement responsibility and authority of the sheriff.”
With reference to my letter dated 09/03/2011, on page 1, paragraph 3 I wrote, “For the record, Sheriff Haney, I am not challenging your authority to regulate and enforce written laws, i.e., codes, statutes and ordinances but to present the fact that all government, which includes the County of Trinity, has limited jurisdiction with regard to law, the land and people” (my emphasis added).
It is my understanding that – in America – the sheriff is an integral part of law enforcement and the law which is being enforced is written law, however, extensive and verifiable research has proven that unwritten English common law is still the law and that written law is limited to what government owns. Proprietary ownership is the right by which the owner of property may dictate the terms of operation and management according to the will of the owner or proprietor. Stated another way; “He who owns the land makes the rules.”
English common law is the basic law for the people in 49 of the 50 States of the Confederacy known as the United States of America. The basic government and basic written law in all the 50 States of the Confederacy is the authority of the Articles of Confederation of November 15,
– Page 2 –
1777, the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 and the Constitution of the United States. The Constitution of the United States did not replace the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777, as is commonly taught. The ratification of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 by nine States established the Constitution of the United States among and between those States which permitted the purchase of territory within those States by the Confederacy thus the territory within those States became subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America.
The English common law is unwritten law much the same as the “Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God” of the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776. Written law is produced by government for government. The idea that judges produce the English common law is attributable to the common law’s ancient English heritage in which the English monarch was in total charge of government and its bureaucracy which included common law judges. American English common law must be adjusted to function without a monarch. American judges are in the same position as the English judges with respect to the English common law. American judges’ power and authority is based on the power and authority of the appointing entity. All American governments claim power through the Constitution of the United States, therefore, judicial and law enforcement power is territorially limited to what is owned by the Confederacy, the United States of America. American judges and law enforcement personnel are, therefore, in the position where they must accept the territorial limitation to their authority.
The State of California like the United States of America of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 is both a political and geographical entity. The State of California represents the interests of California, which has retained its “sovereignty, freedom and independence,” by certain activities such as maintenance of the California National Guard.
Enclosed you will find a map entitled Trinity County Land Ownership dated December 31, 2011 which I obtained from the Trinity County Planning Department via a California Public Records Act Request (GOVT. CODE Section 6250 – 626.48). I requested a map which clearly and accurately demonstrated the following:
1. The territory, i.e., land within the exterior boundaries of the County
of Trinity that has been ceded to and is owned by the federal government.
2. The territory, i.e., land within the exterior boundaries of the County
of Trinity that has not been ceded to or owned by the federal government.
Ownership indicated on the enclosed map, which I have summarized below, clearly demonstrates that land within Trinity County is either held in private ownership or is owned by government.
– Page 3 –
Ownership, Dec. 2011
Please note that sections of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California – which specifically limit taxation to federal territory within California – clearly defines that “in this State” or “in the State” means within the exterior limits of the State of California and includes all territory within these limits owned by or ceded to the United States of America.
§5304. “In this State” means within the exterior limits of the State of California,
and includes all territory within these limits owned by or ceded to the United States of America.
On page 2, paragraph 1 you write, “Per 830.1 of the Penal Code sworn deputies and I can enforce state law on any lands within the State of California including federal land (my emphasis added). In the California Revenue and Taxation Code “In the State” or “within the State of California” identifies – with the most explicit language possible – federal territory as a State within a state, i.e., the State of California being the federal owned territory within California – as California being the geographic state.
Lawmaking, law enforcement and taxation are expressly limited by the Constitution of the State of California in Article 3 Section 1: “The State of California is an inseparable part of the United States of America, and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land”, tells the world the truth; the State of California is the land in California owned by or subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States of America. Therefore, as a point of undeniable fact, your statement, which I quoted above, should read, “Sworn deputies and I may enforce the law only on land within the State of California”.

______________________________________________________________
Acres Percent of Total

Private ( Other, APZ, TPZ)    488,687                                    23.8
Government:
County                                                9,368                                         .50
State of California                             2,905                                         .10
Federal Government                1,550,617                                     75.6
(BLM, BOR, Forest Service)
Total 2,051,575                                  100
– Page 4
Written law must state the truth about the law or it is not law. Ignorance of the law may not be an excuse, however, it is the reason practically everyone in California readily submits to written law and taxation.
Please note that a fact alleged is a fact sustained when not rebutted with a more complete and truthful exposition of the law.
Respectfully,
Edward X. xxxxxx
cc: Wendy Tyler, Clerk for the Board
Michael B Harper, District Attorney/Public Administrator
Derek P. Cole, County Attorney

ENCLOSURE

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Free Inhabitant, NO Property Tax, INTRO

Posted: 28th November 2011 by admin in Pay No Property Tax, Tax / Property

Comments Off

Dedicated to – God – Family – Country

Titled Presentation: Free Inhabitant, NO Property Tax

Topic-Why Federal-US / and STATE written property tax laws are constitutionally limited to “only” land owned by the Federal government. This presentation is an essential step in understanding how, and why, if any, the English Common Law courts must be utilized if one wants a fair trial.

(Approximately 30 minute WORD power point presentation, thirty three or more slides, with MP3 audio.)

–pauljjhansen.com (authors home page)

-See also- edrivera.com (source of main topic)

–freeinhabitant.info/?p=12 (For revised versions of this presentation as well as the development of others, instructions of how to operate PowerPoint, auto readers, or MP3 file, will be explained at this site.) MP3 Player free software- **See below.

Pay for counsel fees using this Button.

pauljjhansen@hotmail.com Message box – 402-957-2853 Omaha, Nebraska

Send comments and recommendations, the pertinent ones will be listed, by topic, under the titled presentation page at freeinhabitant.info.

This page is not part of the audio presentation; make a copy of this one INTRO page for each person in the audience.

I request a one time fee of 5 dollars for the delivery of this presentation by me to you by email. You have permission to show the Presentation to anyone at no cost. Please do not give the presentation out to others; each order has an internal tracking identifier. Do encourage the audience to visit freeinhabitant.info for placing there own orders and donations. If you are so led, ask for a one dollar donation to be considered from each one in the audience and forward the payment to me. We are dealing with a very big freedom issue here so do consider keeping me employed in providing winning legal principals to you for the very modest fee.

I ask is that you encourage others to order there own copy for the 5$ directly from me so they can present it to their friends and family. This is only one of a series of presentations available; contact me for all past and new presentations available.

To order email a request to – pauljjhansen@hotmail.com – and ask for presentation “FREE INHABITANT, NO Property Tax”, or make Payment here> Only 5$.

Reproduction and presentation only as allowed per agreement.

** Download Now (50.98 Mb) Creative-MediaSource-Player or

** http://www.filecluster.com/Audio-Video/Utilities-Plug-ins/Download-Creative-MediaSource-Player-Organizer.html

((Some add the page below by copying it to the back of this page for the audience to have. Just shrink it to fit on one page.))

Many lawyers that have see this presentation have said; “this is true” and it changes everything.”

>>>>

Welcome to Free Inhabitant.info, a site designed to give sound foundational evidence of the limitations of law, my name is Paul John Hansen, I am the author of this presentation,

I live in Omaha, Nebraska. And I have been a student of law for over 15 years and have been in court more than 200 times for a wide range of my own personal legal matters, consisting of both civil and criminal cases.

I have assembled this presentation, titled as “FREE INHABITANT, NO Property Tax” in hopes that it will be presented to many for the furtherance of understanding of the difference from a free inhabitant and a United States Citizen, as the terms are used in Article 4 of the Articles of Confederation of 1777, and their ownership of Property / Land as independent from a STATE tax governance.

The primary topic that will be covered by this presentation discloses the difference between land that is owned by the United States of America and taxed by the Unite States written law, known as the United States Code / STATE Statute, and conversely land that is not owned by the United States of America and is not Taxable by the said United States written code / STATE Statute.

I ask that the presentation stay in its virgin form and that all requested changes be reported to me personally so that the presentation or like presentations will continually be improved and all paid customers can have access at no cost to the changes of the improved versions. Please inform me of any errors of any type in this presentation.

The presentation is a Microsoft POWER POINT.

Do study.. edrivera.com, it is a large site written by a dis barred, attorney for successfully using these arguments in the United States administrative courts.

I am a paid member of his class for a one time fee of fifty dollars.

Do be generous and make the small donation of five dollars for the hundreds of hours it takes to prepare, distribute, and improve such material as this for the good of our nation.

When presenting this to a group I ask that you give each one in the audience a copy of this INTRO PAGE, so they can have an opportunity to donate and continue passing the message to others. As new presentations are prepared they will be available for viewing at free inhabitant.info. The main subject of this presentation has been said by various attorneys and law professors, as absolutely true, and if done correctly can be protected from usurpation by US courts.

This presentment is in text voice because the contents are improved daily and it is next to impossible to make such improvements any other way.

All purchasers of this presentation will be a lifetime recipient of all notices as to improvements, successes, and failures, with this independence from property tax position. Contact will be maintained by your email address on file.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

No Property Tax, 10+ Years

Posted: 28th November 2011 by admin in Pay No Property Tax, Tax / Property

Comments Off

How I have owned this house since 2001-09-21, paid $20,000 for it, and have paid no property tax for 10+ years, Zero from the day I purchased it.

People have purchased past Tax Sale Certificates and paid some of the taxes listed but when they tried to sue me they just walked away after they read my rock solid legal argument, simply challenged them to produce fact evidence my Property / Land is a type “as described” in the STATE OF NEBRASKA taxing statutes they relied upon, for it specifies that the land must be “owned” by the USA to be taxable.

Order my property tax presentation (only 5$) that shows how I, as a Lawyer, defend against any and all property tax on my 20 homes /rental property.

Below are the links that show the home and property tax payments.

Just Click and see:

http://webapps.dotcomm.org:8080/TreasTax/faces/pages/taxinfo.jsp?parc=1437650002

http://douglasne.mapping-online.com/DouglasCoNe/static/accountinfo.jsp?accountno=R1437650002

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Free Inhabitant

Search Freeinhabitant

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Categories

Di-sin-formation that Government Relies Upon.

US Case Laws do not apply to “Free Inhabitants”.

Another Property Tax Case Won, I say no to property tax.

“Forced” and “Free” can not mix, says Dis-bared Lawyer.

PROPERTY TAXES AND GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES

Private/Self Registration, Public/Access Record, Automobiles

MORE, Registration INFO

Jury Duty / Qualification

Sheriff Noticed of His Limited Jurisdiction

Free Inhabitant, NO Property Tax, INTRO

No Property Tax, 10+ Years

Social Connections

Recent Comments