Citizen, How does one become a US Citizen by law?

Posted: 17th October 2012 by admin in Citizen vs Free Inhabitant process, Citizen vs. Free Inhabitant

Comments Off

When one is standing on land owned by the USA one is a temporary subject to the written laws of the US. This changes as soon as one steps off that land.

When one becomes a citizen of the US “by process” it takes “a process” to renounce citizenship.

The process of becoming a US citizen is found in US written law, as follows:

Statute at large to become a US citizen is “The act of Congress of April 14, 1802, 2 Stat. 153, c, 28, Statute 2165,.

“An alien may be admitted to become a citizen of the United States in the following manner, and not otherwise.”

1. “He shall, two Years at least prior to his admission, declare before a proper court his intention to become a citizen of the United States, and to renounce his allegiance to the potentate or sovereignty of which he may be at the time a citizen or subject.”

2. “He shall, at the time of his application to be admitted, declare, on oath, before some one of the court above specified, that he will support the Constitution of the United States, and that he absolutely and entirely renounces and abjures all allegiance and fidelity to every foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty; and particularly, by name . to the prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of which he was before a citizen or subject, which proceedings shall be recorded by the clerk of the court.”

3. “It shall be made to appear to the satisfaction of the court admitting such alien that he has resided within the United States five years at least, and within the state or territory where such court is at the time held one year at least and that during that time he has behaved as a man of good moral character, attached to the principles of the Constitution of the United States, and well disposed to the good order and happiness of the same; but the oath of the resident shall in no case be allowed to prove his residence.”

“An alien may be admitted to become a citizen of the United States in the following manner, and not otherwise.” [‘not otherwise’ means by no other way]

1. “He shall, two Years at least prior to his admission, declare before a proper court [a US Court] his intention to become a citizen of the United States, and to renounce his allegiance to the potentate or sovereignty of which he may be at the time a citizen or subject [In my case I would need to renounce my free inhabitant standing].”

3. “It shall be made to appear to the satisfaction of the court admitting such alien that he has resided [lived on land owned by the US] within the United States five years at least, and within the state or territory where such court is at the time held one year at least and that during that time he has behaved as a man of good moral character, attached to the principles of the Constitution of the United States, and well disposed to the good order and happiness of the same; but the oath of the resident shall in no case be allowed to prove his residence.” [residency must be supported by more than just his word]

>>

Therefore, all U.S. citizens [i.e. franchised citizens of the District of Columbia] residing in one of the states of the Union, are classified as property, as franchisee’s of the federal government, and as an “individual entity”. See Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773.

Under the “Buck Act”, 4 U.S.C.S. Secs. 105-113, the federal government has created a “Federal area” within the boundaries of all the several states. (In Nebraska that consists of about 1.4% of the land as of 2018.)

Being subject to US written law can be a very confined life, at times in history it required little, today it takes close to 50% of you labor/earnings, and they could by mere congressional vote demand 100%.

Possibly if one is born on USA owned land one needs to renounce citizenship and become a subject to the class of free inhabitants, I am not sure, nor know how/where one would do this. -Paul Hansen-

(The above 1802 written law has been amended slightly.)

Much of the above came from this article by the INFORMER. (Look for the 1-4-12 Post)

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Right To Travel, Duty Free, Tax on Carriages (Automobiles), Limited to US Property.

Posted: 27th September 2012 by admin in Travel Rights

Comments Off

Below is an 1794 Act that taxes carriages, (which still applied to present day automobiles) but it is tricky how they hid that it can only have force and effect on land owned by the United States.

Sorry for the small print, it is found in United States – Third Congress, Sess 1, CH. 43,45 1794, on page 373.

The foot note is where the scope of the act is to operate:

“The act of Congress of June 5, 1794, laying duties upon carriages for the conveyance of persons, is a constitutional act, and within the authority granted to Congress by the 8th section of the first article of the constitution. Hylton v. The United States, 3 Dall. 171; 1 Cond. Rep. 83.”

Click here to see the full Act.

It is limited to the “exclusive Legislative Authority” as found in the 8th section of the first article of the constitution. See below:

“To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession (D.C.) of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings; And” Article I, Section 8, (par.17) United States Constitution, September 17, 1787.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Officer Can Not Prove Land is “of” the United States.

Posted: 24th August 2012 by admin in Territorial jurisdiction

Comments Off

Just spent an hour in a Nebraska County Court (Sarpy), The Officer could not produce fact evidence that the act took place “on” land that is a possession or territory “of” the United States. Trial is Set to Continue.

I now understand that the “State” that the US Constitution with the USC calls a “State” of Nebraska is land in Nebraska owned by the USA.

Now the “State of Nebraska” is a grouped word title, different from the above singular word “State” and is therefore an entity (corporate), with its own land holding, yet being subject to its creator the USA.

So the land I was claimed to be traveling on without registration is of the “State of Nebraska” a corporate entity, (see accompanying Deed showing the highway where the stop occurred land owner) not of land “of” the United States which the statute requires to have force and effect of law.

Oh how tricky they have been, such a play on of words to trick us into believing US Court jurisdiction exists at this specific location.

So now I must direct examination the Officer and force him to admit ether the land is not “of” the United States, or admit he does not know and has not been able to bring that evidence to the Court, and if he says it is then I’ll demand he produce the fact evidence to support his statement.

For if the statement is not supported by fact it is only a belief then….. Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana. May 4, 2012 366 S.W.3d 732 “An affidavit, based on the affiant’s “best knowledge and belief,” is no evidence of the facts asserted.”

Federal Rules of Evidence, 28 U.S.C.A. Rule 602. Need for Personal Knowledge

A witness may testify to a matter only if evidence is introduced sufficient to support a finding that the witness has personal knowledge of the matter. Evidence to prove personal knowledge may consist of the witness’ s own testimony. This rule does not apply to a witness’s expert testimony under Rule 703

Therefore – Court must dismiss because no evidence of the criminal charge took place in (on land) the claimed jurisdiction of where the written law has force and effect of law applies.

[[All Motor Vehicle violations must occur in the state, state is defined as:

Statutes > Nebraska > Chapter 60 MOTOR VEHICLES > 60-666 State, defined.

60-666. State, defined.State shall mean a state, territory, or possession of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or a province of Canada. Source Laws 1993, LB 370, § 162.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Di-sin-formation that Government Relies Upon.

Posted: 21st August 2012 by admin in Tax

Comments Off

The biggest error in this clips discussing “There is no law that you must pay Federal Taxes” is that all requirement, if any, is entered into, or created, by contract between the United States and a willing, or more often uninformed, participant.

If you have a contract with me to mow my yard and the contracts says if you fail to do so that I get your car, there is no need for a law. The same is for the IRS, no law is needed only the existence of a contract. So all the IRS must establish is the presumption of mere evidence of a contract to prevail in a US Court.

If you are not an expert in Federal Rules of Court Procedure you will be destroyed if you allow it to proceed to court, read all pages as related to 6203 Assessment for a sure defense against the IRS encroachment upon your life.

Much of the information in this clip will guarantee a loss in court, it is such disinformation that Government relies upon to keep the truth from getting out. Few find out until it is too late.

http://famguardian.org/Media/MostAmericansDoNotOweIncomeTax.wmv

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

US Case Laws do not apply to “Free Inhabitants”.

Posted: 7th August 2012 by admin in Exclusive Legislative Authority

DRED SCOTT v. SANDFORD (1856) (19 Howard) 60 US 393

The words “people of the United States” and “citizens” are synonymous terms, and mean the same thing. They both describe the political body who, according to our republican institutions, form the sovereignty and who hold the power and conduct the Government through their representatives. They are what we familiarly call the “sovereign people,” and every citizen is one of this people, and a constituent member of this sovereignty. [404]

Streets and highways are established and maintained primarily for purposes of travel by the public.
[American Jurisprudence 2d Series, Volume 39, HIGHWAYS, STREETS, AND BRIDGES, § 227 Generally]
Birmingham Ry., Light & Power Co. v. Smyer, 181 Ala. 121, 61 So. 354 (1913);
Escobedo v. State Dept. of Motor Vehicles, 35 Cal.2d 870, 222 P.2d 1 (1950)
(overruled on other grounds by, Rios v. Cozens, 7 Cal.3 792, 103 Cal.Rptr. 299, 499 P.2d 979 (1972));
Yale University v. City of New Haven, 104 Conn. 610, 134 A. 268, 47 A.L.R. 667 (1926);
Smith v. City of Jefferson, 161 Iowa 245, 142 N.W. 220 (1950);
Terrell v. Tracy, 312 Ky. 631, 229 S.W.2d 433 (1950);
Brenning v. Remington, 136 Neb. 883, 287 N.W. 776 (1939);
Ex Parte Duncan, 1937 OK 155, 179 Okla. 355, 65 P.2d 1015 (1937);
City of Radford v. Calhoun, 165 Va. 24, 181 S.E. 345, 100 A.L.R. 1378 (1935);
Ex Parte Dickey, 76 W.Va. 576, 85 S.E. 781 (1915);
Park Hotel Co. v. Ketchum, 184 Wis. 182, 199 N.W. 219, 33 A.L.R. 351 (1924).

Above is just an example of how the unlearned person jumps with joy at using the above cases, when in fact he is often creating his own demise when relying upon them.
People who claim to be a “people of the United States”, “citizens” or “sovereign people”, or even the “public”, thinking that is freedom when the very opposite is true.
The above case law, and all like presidents, are exclusively for areas and people (public) governed by the same US Court that makes the ruling. Said courts can only make determination within there own jurisdiction and when one uses their case determinations one is giving a strong presumption that you are of that jurisdiction.
Being of their jurisdiction is just the opposite of being an Article IV (4) of the Articles of Confederation “free inhabitant”.
Bing a “citizen” (subject) is much the opposite of being a “free inhabitant”.
So all these people that go to a US Court and use US Case Law to attempt to prove there independence from the US governance / regulation is a full act of ignorance that is carefully manicured by the US system to gain governance.
Being independent means just that, when “not” on US Land one is independent of the written law of that same land. So when the US hounds jump their fence and invade non-US Land do not shout their case laws to ward them off. Such shouting is liken to standing in front of a high speed train and telling it to stop, you are going to get flattened. Instead give notice to the conductor he does not have authority on tracks not owned by the United States of America. Paul Hansen

Order my 5$ presentation found at https://freeinhabitant.info/?p=17.

The US has generally valid laws, the problem lies in that they are just applied to you.

The only “public” the US Court can address is generally only those that are on their land.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Another Property Tax Case Won, I say no to property tax.

Posted: 27th July 2012 by admin in Pay No Property Tax, Tax / Property

Comments Off

Paul John Hansen won another property tax case.

Case No. CIVIL 11-4161, Douglas County Court, Nebraska (2011) Case dismissed for lack of prosecution at plaintiff’s / petitioner’s cost.

The above is a document that is associated with a $50,000.00 property of mine. A private party purchased a Tax Certificate sold by the County. I challenged the jurisdiction, with brief, as I was instructed by a retired district court judge. The Plaintiff’s Attorney sat on the case for more than one year, without even one hearing. The case simply expired. (just as with the first case) To receive the brief that scared the Attorney off, just email me and I can forward it to you. Do order the 5$ “Property Tax PPT” Slides / Audio Power Point Presentation, see: Property Tax Presentation https://freeinhabitant.info/?p=56

Brief includes: a. Notice to Court of “No Consent” – “No Contract”. b. Notice to Attorney of his utilizing a state licensed without the united States. c. Brief describing limited authority of the taxing statutes as were relied upon by the moving party.

This is the second case where people walked away from the case, per instruction by their attorney, and I paid no property tax. Currently doing 6 others with the same process.

Four or five years ago I wrote a check for $20,000.00 property tax, that was the last one, then I learned the truth about who has a duty to pay a statutory tax duty.

If you do not keep the burden of proof on the moving party you will lose every-time.

For 35$ you will receive the following by Dropbox.com:

Property Tax Brief. Case Document Filings and Case Chronology.
Notice upon acting Attorney of his violation for practicing law under a State Attorney License outside of his jurisdiction, and attempting to compel his clients to pay him to apply State taxing statutes upon non-State lands.
Opportunity to purchase the “Property Tax” Power Point Picture / Audio Presentation for 5$.
Opportunity to purchase the “Free Inhabitant One A:, (Territorial Jurisdiction), 45 minute+ Picture / Audio Presentation for 5$.
Life long 24/7 access to all Property Tax case activities associated with my properties and my clients properties.

Purchase at > “https://freeinhabitant.info/?p=56”

or click below for full Case Challenges, Motions, Briefs, and Judicial Notices.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

“Forced” and “Free” can not mix, says Dis-bared Lawyer.

Posted: 15th July 2012 by admin in Tax / Property

PROPERTY TAXES AND GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES

Taxes on property are determined by getting a list of all taxable property, appraising each property and then apportioning the amount of revenue to be collected among the listed property according to the appraised value of each property.

Knowing how direct taxation works in the abstract only makes property tax collection a simple process in an absolute monarchy, where the concept of the king’s realm or domain makes everything and everybody subject to direct taxation.

Getting rid of the king, as the Americans did in the American Revolution, would have gotten rid of the property tax in America, if George Washington hadn’t stepped in and taken King George III’s place.

Washington became head of the United States of America on April 6, 1789 and head of the government on April 30, 1789 and that process has continued through the administration of Barack Hussein Obama.

All those Presidents have spawned a new “Multitude of new Offices, and sent hither Swarms of Officers to harass our People, and eat out their Substance,” who are now called government employees.

As was the case with all the king’s men, all government employees ultimately end up wielding the unrestrained the power of a king.

All over America cities are facing the reality of bankruptcy brought on by the mistaken belief the People and their property could be taxed without limit.

The new reality every municipality must face is the fact that the Declaration of Independence had it right—that taxation required informed consent.

George Washington fathered this country using deceit and military force. Now that we know how it was done we can stop deceitful collections and in the future allow no “Taxes on us without our Consent.”

Washington’s government takeover is fully documented in my “Basic Course in Law and Government,” which anyone can sample for $50. Graduates of the Basic Course can qualify to take the Advanced Course in Law. You can start your legal education, as every legal education should, with the Organic Laws of the United States of America. Contact Paul at pauljjhansen@hotmail.com and he will send you searchable Organic Laws along with information about the Basic Course in Law and Government.

(Paul Hansen has won several property tax cases recently, and is in court at this time on 7 more properties to win even more, the defense is simple, “ya have no evidence of written law that includes my land” jurisdiction.)

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera , Dis-bared Lawyer after 30 years.

((I was told by a lawyer that jurisdiction was greatly impressed on him in law school as tools to win cases, then upon practicing he was told by judges that such challenges in their courts will cause us to disbar you.))

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Private/Self Registration, Public/Access Record, Automobiles

Posted: 5th June 2012 by admin in Owner Proof, Private, Registration / Self / Vehicle

Comments Off

Below INFO is found at- www.https://freeinhabitant.info/?p=64

Private Registration / Proof of Ownership / Declaration of Standing / Ecclesiastical* Jurisdiction / Affidavit of Truth, all evidence with owner, possession being primary proof of ownership:
-NOTICE to All- Vehicle*/Automobile Information

001. Year- 2008, Make JIMSTAR, Model FIJI 150 Motorcycle, Color- Yellow, Chassis Number LJ4TCKPB58YO75344. Previous Owner- Jonathan Paper, 12722 Ridgeview Cir, Bellevue, NE 68123. NOTICE – Collateral lien for one-half troy ounce of gold, number 10-3-12-714-8940-a. Owner is a man called Paul John Hansen 1548 N 19, Omaha, Nebraska an address without the United States, being not a resident of the United States, of ecclesiastical* jurisdiction. For use not associated with transporting cargo or persons ‘for hire’, not owned by the United States or any state thereof. pauljjhansenlaw@gmail.com, 402-957-2853.
-and-
002. Year- 2001, Make Honda, Model Honda Motorcycle, Color- Red, Chassis Number JH2RE01041K201761. Previous Owner- LONNIE LARUE, 325 2nd St, Meadow Grove, NE 68752. NOTICE – Collateral lien for two troy ounce of gold, number 10-1-12-567-2345-a. Owner is a man called Paul John Hansen 1548 N 19, Omaha, Nebraska an address without the United States, being not a resident of the United States, of ecclesiastical* jurisdiction. For use not associated with transporting cargo or persons ‘for hire’, not owned by the United States or any state thereof. pauljjhansenlaw@gmail.com, 402-957-2853.
-and-
003. Year- 2002, Make Honda, Model Honda Motorcycle, Color- Red, Chassis Number JH2RD06062K001851. Previous Owner- BUSH KEVIN M, PO BOX 1001,325, ALAMOSA, CO 81101-1001. NOTICE – Collateral lien for two and one-half troy ounce of gold, number 10-2-12-714-8940-a. Owner is a man called Paul John Hansen 1548 N 19, Omaha, Nebraska an address without the United States, being not a resident of the United States, of ecclesiastical* jurisdiction. For use not associated with transporting cargo or persons ‘for hire’, not owned by the United States or any state thereof. pauljjhansenlaw@gmail.com, 402-957-2853.
-and-
004. Year- 1995, Make Ford, Model Taurus GL/SE, Color- White, Chassis Number 1FALP52U4SG241419. Previous Owner- JEFF WALLICK / BARBARA A WALLICK, RR2 BOX 280, OSMOND, NE 68765. NOTICE – Collateral lien for three and one-half troy ounce of gold, number 1-17-14-714-8940-a. Owner is a man called Paul John Hansen 1548 N 19, Omaha, Nebraska an address without the United States, being not a resident of the United States, of ecclesiastical* jurisdiction. For use not associated with transporting cargo or persons ‘for hire’, not owned by the United States or any state thereof. pauljjhansenlaw@gmail.com, 402-957-2853.
-and-
005. Year- 1996, Make Mercedes, Model E300, Color- Black, Chassis Number WDBJF20F7TJ002537. Previous Owner- DAVE BLOCKER, 103 N MAIN, WYANDOTTE, OK 74370-4002. NOTICE – Collateral lien for three and one-half troy ounce of gold, number 5-21-14-714-8940-a. Owner is a man called Paul John Hansen 1548 N 19, Omaha, Nebraska an address without the United States, being not a resident of the United States, of ecclesiastical* jurisdiction. For use not associated with transporting cargo or persons ‘for hire’, not owned by the United States or any state thereof. pauljjhansenlaw@gmail.com, leave message only 402-957-2853, and personal cell 402-541-6023. MORE
-Owners Private Drivers License / I.D. – https://freeinhabitant.info/travel-rights/got-my-kingdom-driver-license.htm
-and-

006. Year- 1995, Make – Chevy CHALLENGER, Model P30, Style-27′ MOTORHOME, Color- Blue/White, Chassis Number 1GBJP37N5S3302053. Title Number 16067290004, Gas, Previous Owner- MERTZ, RANDY & MERTZ RHONDA, 415 N 3RD ST. BOX 306, ARLINGTON NE 68002-0306. NOTICE – Collateral lien for three and 12.43 troy ounces of gold @ 1287$/oz., number 10-23-17-714-8940-a. Owner is a man called Paul John Hansen 1548 N 19, Omaha, Nebraska an address without the United States, being not a resident of the United States, of ecclesiastical*/Church jurisdiction. For use not associated with transporting cargo or persons ‘for hire’, not owned by the United States or any state thereof. pauljjhansenlaw@gmail.com, 402.541.6023. ADD MORE SOON
-Owners Private Drivers License / I.D. – https://freeinhabitant.info/travel-rights/got-my-kingdom-driver-license.htm

*vehicle defined: a means/device of carrying something < planes, trains, automobile.
*ecclesiastical defined: of the Christian Church.

The above document are carried with the vehicle to give evidence of owner, use, and independence, from the United States Departments of Motor Vehicles, governance by US written law.
Click HERE to view the list of foundation information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

>>>>

007. Year- 2007, Make – Suzukie, Model DL650, Type Motorcycle, Color- Gray, Chassis Number JS1VP54A572100864. Title Number 108169717 FL, Gas, Previous Owner- Jonathan A Poalto, 143 Windsor Plane, Gulf Breeze, Florida (near 37561) (Sold on Date of 10/25/2019). NOTICE – Present Owner is a man called Paul John Hansen, 238 South Egret Bay Blvd, #155, League City , Texas [ near 77573 ] an address of one of the People of Texas, without the United States, being not a resident of the United States. For use not associated with transporting cargo or persons ‘for hire’ / or commercial gain, not owned by the United States or any state thereof. pauljjhansenlaw@gmail.com, 2513628231. ADD MORE SOON
-Picture of bike and plate.

*vehicle defined: a means/device of carrying something < planes, trains, automobile.
*ecclesiastical defined: of the Christian Church.

>>>>

MORE, Registration INFO

Posted: 7th April 2012 by admin in Blank

Comments Off

005. Year- 1996, Make Mercedes, Model E300, Color- Black, Chassis Number WDBJF20F7TJ002537:

Picture of Owner in 2014:

4 picture, D.O.B. 6/30/1958, Male, White, 5 foot-8 inches, 165 pounds, Brown Hair, Brown Eyes.

Picture of automobile, and Chassis Number:

Title: Front Back, notarized, certified copy retained in automobile folder package.

Bill of Sale, notarized, certified copy retained in automobile folder package.

Power of Attorney of Mercedes, notarized, certified copy retained in automobile folder package.

Picture of Affidavit of owner, status, and jurisdiction:

Jury Duty / Qualification

Posted: 7th April 2012 by admin in Jury Duty

Comments Off

Edward X. xxxxx
PO Box xxx
Hayfork, CA 9601
____________________________________________________________________________________

US / County / District / State / Court Jury Duty / Qualification

March 12, 2012
Ms. Laurie Wills
Court Executive Officer/Jury Commissioner
Superior Court of California
County of Trinity
Courthouse – Court Street
PO Box 1258
Weaverville, CA 96093 – 1258
RE: Complaint Filed 02/21/2012
STATEMENT OF FACTS AND REASONS CONTINUED
Dear Ms. Wills:
With reference to your letter dated February 29, 2012, in response to my complaint captioned above, on page 2, paragraph 1 you state the following:
“197 (b) [“the Department of Motor Vehicles’ list of licensed
drivers and identification cardholders” is an appropriate source
list).] DMV information indicates that you are, in fact, a United States
citizen, domiciled in Trinity County, California.”
Continuing on page 2, paragraph 2 –
“You responses assert that you are not a citizen of the United
States, do not reside in California, and are not a resident of Trinity
County”.
As for page 2, paragraph 2 cited above, my original complaint page 3, paragraph 2 more accurately states the following:
“With reference to the California Code of Civil Procedure Chapter 1. Section (a) (1), (3), (4) and (b) I told Judge Woodward that – “With respect to my being a person eligible and qualified to be a perspective trial juror I rebut the presumption that I am a citizen of the United States, that I am a domiciliary of the State of California and/or that I am a resident of the jurisdiction.
Regarding your reference cited with respect to “the Department of Motor Vehicles”, the fact remains that all State constitutions are subordinate to the Constitution of the United States and “all people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights,” except when those people are on the property of another especially if the property belongs to the government.
– Page 2 –
Qualifications for “citizens of the United States” are set out in the 14th Amendment. Only persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” are citizens of the United States. The United States is, therefore, a place and the question becomes were you born or naturalized there.
The Constitution of September 17, 1787 requires Representatives to be “seven Years a Citizen of the United States” and Senators must be “nine Years a Citizen of the United States.” Both a Representative and a Senator must be “an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.”
Article VII of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 provides “for the Establishment of this Constitution between the States so ratifying the Same,” upon the ratification of nine States, which occurs on June 21, 1788. On that date, the States of Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Maryland, South Carolina, and New Hampshire become Article I Section 2 Clause 3 “the several States which may be included within this Union.” Article I Section 2 Clause 3 sets out the number of Representatives each State shall have in the Congress of the United States until “The actual Enumeration shall be made.”
On April 30, 1789, President of the United States of America, George Washington takes this oath of Office of President of the United States: “I, George Washington, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” “So help me God.”
Upon these facts, we can conclude the Representatives and Senators chosen after June 21, 1788 were Citizens of the United States of America though the Senators were not Citizens for nine years when elected. It can also be concluded that several States that constituted this Union, the United States, were constituted of territory owned by the United States of America and subject to its exclusive jurisdiction.
Citizenship is created by governments and written law, which according to the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776, are instituted among men to secure unalienable rights. Citizenship is a duty in service to freedom and not a pledge to sustain government.
The law of freedom in 49 of the 50 States of the United States of America is the English common law. A juror, who must be a citizen of the United States, is not free to judge or determine the law of the case. The citizen of the United States juror is bound to accept the law as it is given by the government judge.
All 50 States of the United States of America are bound to the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 and Article IV which guarantees a free inhabitant the same privileges and immunities of a citizen. This means that I am not obligated to claim United States citizenship and I may cease to be even if I were subject to its territorial jurisdiction.
Respectfully submitted,
Edward J. Guenette

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Free Inhabitant

Search Freeinhabitant

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Categories

Citizen, How does one become a US Citizen by law?

Right To Travel, Duty Free, Tax on Carriages (Automobiles), Limited to US Property.

Officer Can Not Prove Land is “of” the United States.

Di-sin-formation that Government Relies Upon.

US Case Laws do not apply to “Free Inhabitants”.

Another Property Tax Case Won, I say no to property tax.

“Forced” and “Free” can not mix, says Dis-bared Lawyer.

PROPERTY TAXES AND GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES

Private/Self Registration, Public/Access Record, Automobiles

MORE, Registration INFO

Jury Duty / Qualification

Social Connections

Recent Comments