Free Inhabitant

Motor Vehicle Code applied to “for hire” only.

Posted: 13th February 2013 by admin in for hire, Motor Vehicle

Comments Off

mu·nic·i·pal·i·ty (my-ns-pl-t)
n. pl. mu·nic·i·pal·i·ties
1. A political unit, such as a city, town, or village, incorporated for local self-government.
2. A body of officials appointed to manage the affairs of a local political unit.

A judge told me that he could not take judicial notice of a legislative bill because he needed proof it was passed, is not repealed, and is now standing law. He said I need to get a certified copy from the keeper of legislative bills.

I ordered 4 certified copies of the attached 1905 Nebraska Bill which states that there must be a ‘for hire’ activity before the Motor Vehicle written laws can be applied.

Now it is the obligation for the Prosecutor to produce evidence that it is not standing law. I personally find no changes. The no surprise fact is that the codified statutes, which is not law but only evidence of law until rebutted, has removed the ‘for hire’ requirement. this is nothing short of evil.

549, Original Bill

Below is how the bill is originally passed. The next paragraph below is how the code revisionist have taken out the ‘for hire’ element, this done in violation for the bill has not been evidenced as being changed.
5388o Sec. 150 [Municipal ordinances.] Cities and towns shall have no power to pass, in force or maintain any ordinance, rule or regulation requiring of any owner or operator of a motor vehicle any license or permit to use the public highways or exclude or prohibit any motor vehicle whose owner has complied with section two (2) or section four (4) of this act from the free use of such highways, and all such ordinances, rules or regulations now in force, are hereby declared to be of no validity or effect: provided that nothing in this act shall be construed as limiting the power of local authorities to make and force and maintain an ordinance, rule or regulations, in addition to the provisions of this act, affecting motor vehicles which are offered to the public for hire. [I.d., § 11.]
Source- Compiled Statutes of NEBRASKA Anotated 1907 and 1909.
1905 is the first time motor vehicle appears in NE law.
Both years, as above, read exactly like the Legislative Bill of 1905.

5388o Sec. 150 [Municipal ordinances.] Nothing in this act shall be construed in limiting the power of local authorities to make, enforce and maintain any ordinance, rule or regulation, in addition to the provisions of this act affecting motor vehicles. [I.d., § 11.]
Source- Compiled Statutes of NEBRASKA Anotated 1911.

Note this revision they left of the “which are offered to the public for hire”, now why did they accidentally do that?

Notice no ‘for hire’ is stated.

>>

Terms Defined:

*libelant – Formerly the party who filed an initiatory action (a formal declaration of a claim), corresponding to the plaintiff in actions at law.

*libelee – one against whom a libel has been filed in a court, corresponding to the defendant in actions at law.

*averment, noun – 1. an affirmation or allegation, 2. a formal statement by a party in a case of a fact, or circumstance, that the party declares as true, or a challenge for contrary evidence.

*POSITIVE-AVERMENTs – facts declared as being true.

*NEGATIVE-AVERMENTs – beliefs that are declared as being false.

*American , state-national – a man, with birth right on Nebraska soil, as a man who has not elected to become a United States citizen, as a man who is not a resident of United States, and as a man who does not resides on United States land, as a man who has never contracted with the United States.

*travel – use of the open way (road), as non-commercial, not for profit.

*American National, noun – as one man, of many men, of birth right ties, to the land that consists of land between Canada’s South Border, Mexico’s Norther Border, the Atlantic ocean and the Pacific Ocean.

Additional INFO, to aid in ‘as a matter of law determinations‘:

Breakdown of US “Motor Vehicle” as defined:

5388o Sec. 150 [Municipal ordinances.] Cities and towns shall have no power to pass, in force or maintain any ordinance, rule or regulation requiring of any owner or operator of a motor vehicle any license or permit to use the public highways or exclude or prohibit any motor vehicle whose owner has complied with section two (2) or section four (4) of this act from the free use of such highways, and all such ordinances, rules or regulations now in force, are hereby declared to be of no validity or effect: provided that nothing in this act shall be construed as limiting the power of local authorities to make and force and maintain an ordinance, rule or regulations, in addition to the provisions of this act, affecting motor vehicles which are offered to the public for hire. [I.d., § 11.]
Source- Compiled Statutes of NEBRASKA Anotated 1907 and 1909.
1905 is the first time motor vehicle appears in NE law, as House Roll 146, Mr Hand Legislative Bill of 1905.

>>

View/Search the bill > https://books.google.com/books?id=EJJGAQAAIAAJ&pg=RA1-PA1404&lpg=RA1-PA1404&dq=5388o+Sec.+150+Nebraska+%5BMunicipal+ordinances.%5D&source=bl&ots=A5zU-4U2kK&sig=ACfU3U3q1ryyeK0e5NgJq7c2sV1lhoBDGg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwix3_vrw4zgAhUKlKwKHWnJBhIQ6AEwAHoECAoQAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false

>>>

18 U.S. Code § 31 – Definitions

(a)Definitions.—In this chapter, the following definitions apply:

(6)Motor vehicle.—

The term “motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo.

(10)Used for commercial purposes.—

The term “used for commercial purposes” means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit.

Title 1 of the United States Code is General Provisions. Section 2 of that title defines county: “The word “county” includes a parish, or any other equivalent subdivision of a State or Territory of the United States.”

U.S. Code › Title 1 › Chapter 1 › § 2

The word “county” includes a parish, or any other equivalent subdivision of a State or Territory of the United States.

(July 30, 1947, ch. 388, 61 Stat. 633.)

Supremacy Clause

United States Constitution – Article IV, clause 2, – “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof … shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”

United States Constitution – Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17, The limitations of the United States, which is the same limitations as the STATE OF NEBRASKA legislature.

“To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of Particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings…”

The Articles of Confederation – Article I. The Style of this confederacy shall be “The United States of America.”

Nebraska Revised Statute 60-123.

Motor vehicle, defined.

Motor vehicle means any vehicle propelled by any power other than muscular power. Motor vehicle does not include (1) mopeds, (2) farm tractors, (3) self-propelled equipment designed and used exclusively to carry and apply fertilizer, chemicals, or related products to agricultural soil and crops, agricultural floater-spreader implements, and other implements of husbandry designed for and used primarily for tilling the soil and harvesting crops or feeding livestock, (4) power unit hay grinders or a combination which includes a power unit and a hay grinder when operated without cargo, (5) vehicles which run only on rails or tracks, (6) off-road designed vehicles not authorized by law for use on a highway, including, but not limited to, golf car vehicles, go-carts, riding lawnmowers, garden tractors, all-terrain vehicles, utility-type vehicles, snowmobiles registered or exempt from registration under sections 60-3,207 to 60-3,219, and minibikes, (7) road and general-purpose construction and maintenance machinery not designed or used primarily for the transportation of persons or property, including, but not limited to, ditchdigging apparatus, asphalt spreaders, bucket loaders, leveling graders, earthmoving carryalls, power shovels, earthmoving equipment, and crawler tractors, (8) self-propelled chairs used by persons who are disabled, (9) electric personal assistive mobility devices, and (10) bicycles as defined in section 60-611.

Nebraska Revised Statute 60-355. Transporter, defined.

Transporter means any person lawfully engaged in the business of transporting motor vehicles or trailers not his or her own *solely for delivery thereof (1) by driving singly, (2) by driving in combinations by the towbar, fullmount, or saddlemount method or any combination thereof, or (3) when a truck or truck-tractor tows a trailer.

(The bold and underline is added by Defendant Hansen for location ease only.)

(Not when one elects to register a automobile into the ‘Department of Motor Vehicles’, he no longer is *sole owner.)

Sole – This may become exceedingly important due to if they have a standing ‘state compelling‘ interest in the property (automobile) they have right to govern it as to ‘registration’, licensed operator, liability insurance, etc. But this share in ownership must be consensual, contractual, and without full disclosure such is a void contract.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

You Can Carry a Concealed Gun in “Omaha”.

Posted: 10th February 2013 by admin in Uncategorized

Comments Off

You Can Carry a Concealed Gun in “Omaha” !!!!!!!!

Hansen – Officer I just delivered a shipment of gold to one of my clients, now I am on my way home.
Officer – What is the name of this client?
Hansen – Client 28r7.
Officer – Where was the delivery?
Hansen – Latitude 2576 Longitude 3455.
Officer – That does not make sense?
Hansen – They are in-house parameters, top secret, need to know basis only.
Officer – Why are you carrying a gun strapped to your ankle?
Hansen – “”Own defense“”.
Officer – So you have no gold with you now?
Hansen – Correct, just the money.
Officer – Show me the money.
Hansen – I am not allowed to do that without a order from a court possessing territorial jurisdiction. Do you have such a court order on your person? Also are we standing on land that your employer has a proprietary interest in pursuant to Article 1, Sec 8, Clause 17, of the ‘Constitution for the United States of America’? One more thing where can I get a certified copy of a map of the City of Omaha? (It does not exist.)
Officer – Ah, Ah, I’ll let you go if you go straight home with the gun dismantled and placed in the trunk of your car.
Hansen – I demand that you follow me home then and be my “”own defense”‘, being the criminals know I carry gold and lots of money.
Officer – Have a safe day.

City of Omaha Ordinance:
Sec. 20-192. – Carrying concealed weapon.
It shall be unlawful for any person except an authorized law enforcement officer purposely or knowingly to carry a weapon concealed on or about his person.
(exception)
Sec. 20-194. – Protection as defense.
It shall be a sufficient defense for any person charged under this article to show that he was engaged in a “”lawful business“”, calling or employment and the circumstances in which he was placed at the time were such as to justify a prudent person carrying a weapon for his “”own defense“” or the defense of his family or property.

>>>

All the below written laws are for land “only” within the exterior boundaries of the territory called “Nebraska” that is land being a territory or possession of the United States (owned by the USA).

Concealed Carry

Nebraska is a shall-issue state, meaning that qualified applicants must be issued a concealed carry permit.

Requirements for a concealed carry permit in Nebraska are:

1. state-certified handgun safety course within the past three years,

2. resident of the state, (resident is associated with living in land owned by ‘The United States of America’ in Nebraska.)

3. successful background check

4. at least 21 years of age

5. not a felon.

Castle Doctrine – Nebraska does not have a castle doctrine law. With the exception of inside one’s own home, state law requires a duty to retreat before citizens can protect themselves against violence. Reasonable retreat is not required inside the home. (One cop told me to drag anyone you shoot inside your house before calling the cops.)

Pro-Gun Provisions – Open carry is not restricted in Nebraska under most circumstances.

In automobiles, loaded rifles and handguns can be loaded but must be kept in plain sight (shotguns, on the other hand, must be unloaded). The state is a “shall-issue” state for law-abiding residents age 21 or over who wish to obtain a permit to carry concealed weapons.

Restrictions

License or permit required to purchase guns: A permit is required to purchase handguns in the “STATE” of Nebraska. So best just purchase them in Nebraska in land that is not owned by ‘The United States of America’. Application for a permit is made to the sheriff or police chief in the purchaser’s hometown.

Places in Nebraska where carrying is prohibited, with or without a permit:

Law enforcement facilities
Detention facilities
Courtrooms
Election polling places
Government meeting places
Financial institutions
Professional and collegiate athletic events
Schools and colleges
Churches
Emergency rooms
Political rallies and fundraisers
Establishments that sell alcohol for on-premises consumption
Private establishments — including places of employment — that disallow guns.
((I personally believe that after studying territorial jurisdiction, for 20 plus years, all the above only apply in land that is a ‘possession or territory of the United States’, that is in Nebraska.
https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/federal-land-by-state

NOTE – The above list is applicable to events done on non-USA owned land only as a respect for the proprietors preference and has no relationship to State of Nebraska written law unless the land is owned by the USA.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Why One Should Use Credit Unions and not National Banks

Posted: 16th January 2013 by admin in Banking

Comments Off

National Banks are almost completely dependent on ‘Federal Reserve’ funding and the banks in-house creating of “money” by receiving negotiable instruments (promissory notes) that are then fraudulently deposited as a bank liability as a debit and the of setting entry as a “cash” account credit from which they fraudulently lend you funds from. All of which has never been authorized by Congress, but they have almost full immunity for such crimes when challenged in a US court. This is why they do not need your money anymore, thus you only get interest on deposits that are often less than the inflationary rate for that year, so essentially you get nothing (no investment return) for saving your money.

Credit Unions and Security Companies generally use your money and they have much different reporting relationships with the United States and the Federal Reserve System thus keeping your business your business.

Why associate with a bank that ignores “equal protection under the law”, if you did what they do (counterfeiting bank accounting credits) 24/7, you would go to jail for a long long time.

Only the Federal Reserve has been allowed to create Federal Reserve Credits/Money by congressional authority, not banks.

It has been reported to me that fraudulent IRS confiscation are much more difficult from Credit Unions and Security Companies.

Paul Hansen 1-17-13

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Pay No Sales Tax,

Posted: 9th January 2013 by admin in Sales Tax

Comments Off

This is a letter of one of Paul Hansen’s clients following instructions of ‘how to not pay sales tax‘. Sales tax are to only be paid when doing business on land owned by the USA. A billion dollar scam. If people wrote one check at the end of the year, for all cost that they now pay in a multitude of ways as taxes collected, there would be a rebellion by sunup.

Paul I just thought that I would let you know that I went to the Walmart store that I generally go to and got my exemption card. It was kind of funny. The lady said she had to have a zip code. I said I don’t have one or need one, use any one you like. She went back to her computer and then a little later she came back looking for a tax identification number. I told her I did not have one nor did I need one. I kind of thought she would come back and say she could not get the exemption entered into their computer system but she came back w/a little card that I had to sign to show that I was tax exempt. She gave me back my exemption forms after she had me fill out one of Walmart’s exemption forms. She also said that she had been there for fifteen years and had never seen one of these go through. I wonder if they are told to say fifteen years as that is the exact number of years you mention on your website that one of the vendors that you went to told you they had been there and never seen “one of these”. Just thought you might want to know.

R Miller, Arizona, 1-8-2013

See More- Sales Tax Info.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Traffic Infractions are not Criminal, says California Courts.

Posted: 28th December 2012 by admin in Travel Rights

Traffic Citations are not Criminal, says California Courts.

Date: Tue, Dec 25, 2012
Subject: Californian proves cops can’t write you a traffic ticket
for infractions.

This is a subject that is very near and dear to my heart. As someone
who has been studying the vehicle code and it’s legislative history
on and off for the past 12 years, I just can’t help but smile when
someone proves in open court that the vehicle enforcement apparatus
is nothing more than a massive racketeering operation. OK, maybe
he didn’t prove that, but Dan Giguere of Los Angeles did prove that
the police can’t write a ticket for an infraction.

Dan received a traffic citation a little over a year ago for unsafe
speed in violation of California Vehicle Code section 22350. Dan
went to court and made a special appearance to obtain information as
to who the plaintiff in the case was so that he can file a motion
and properly serve the opposing party. Since the citation doesn’t
indicate who that party is, it was fair to ask the court. Instead
of answering Dan’s question the judge entered a plea of not guilty
with Dan’s objection. Dan was able to quote a California court case
known as People v. Sava which ruled “The limitation of an accused
right to a jury trial has withstood constitutional attack upon the
rationale that the legislature had never intended infractions to
be criminal. The Judge agreed and admitted that the case is not
criminal, which is correct. The judge set the case for trial and
ignored the obvious implications of such a fact.

Dan consulted the Vehicle code and the powers of arrest by a peace
officer and it turns out that peace officers only have the authority
to make an arrest without a warrant if they have probable cause to
believe a public offense has been committed in their presence. A
public offense according to 683 of the Penal code is a type of
offense that warrants a criminal prosecution. But since infractions
are not crimes, then it can’t be a public offense. Some of you may
think “wait a minute, I’m not arrested when I’m given a ticket.” Oh
yes you are. According to 40500 of the Vehicle code a traffic stop
and issuance of a notice to appear constitutes an arrest, besides
what happens if you refuse to sign the ticket? They will threaten to take you
off to jail, and sometimes will.

Dan filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction
and a motion to suppress the notice to appear arguing that the
officer lacked any probable cause to believe a crime has been
committed in his presence and therefore no crime has been alleged. He
filed with the court just a few days before his trial. The judge
agreed with the motion and suppressed the citation and dismissed
Dan’s case.

The significance of this is huge because what you have are peace
officers (city employees) conducting traffic arrests for non-criminal activity,
triggering debt collection actions on behalf of non-complaining
parties by way of a voidable notice to appear.

The next time I get pulled over for an infraction I’m simply going
to ask the officer “What is your probable cause to believe a crime
has been committed?” If he starts to name anything other than an
actual crime than I’m going to tell the officer that infractions are
not crimes according the California Supreme court and that I don’t
consent to the stop”. Once I say I don’t consent and the officer
doesn’t release me, they can be charged for “False Arrest” and that is a crime.

Remember if it is a law principal in the “state” of California it s a law principal in all jurisdiction in which a US court operates.
Good job Dan.
I wander if one can go back on old charges and do the same, probable cause is jurisdiction in the first instance, so the arraignment would be a nullity and all after also.
[11:38:09 AM] WTP, williamfrancis1: See if there is a statute of limitations on barratry.
[11:39:45 AM] pauljjhansen.com: I am quite sure there is no statute of limitation on subject matter jurisdiction in the first instance, no jurisdiction in the first instance means to time starts ticking that is associated with a statute of limitations.

>>>

I personally believe a non-statutory territorial jurisdiction challenge by “Plea In Abatement” should always be your first challenge. Paul John Hansn

P.S. I used one in Nebraska with no registration, suspended license, no liability coverage, and one failure to appear, and the court has now, for 60 days, sat on an “under advisement” statues, so it is obvious the court is in a quandary of what to do. Paul John Hansen 12-29-2012

Original intent of the Legislature is a powerful defense.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Only Citizens Can Legally Vote- most are not.

Posted: 18th December 2012 by admin in Citizen vs. Free Inhabitant, Registered Voter

Comments Off

Only US Citizens can register to vote in US Elections, One must be born or naturalized in the United States to qualify, If your birth certificate does not say “The United States of America” on it you were born on land not in the United States and if not naturalized into the United States you are not a US Citizen even if you have a Social Security Number or a Voter Registration Card. In-fact you are, if known to you, are fraudulently voting.

AMENDMENT XIV
Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868.
Note: Article I, section 2, of the Constitution was modified by section 2 of the 14th amendment. Section 1.
“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
Much more freedom is found in not being a US Citizen, than in being one. See free inhabitant, Article 4, of the Articles of Confederation.

Paul Hansen

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Hansen Subpoenas Head Prosecutor, He Retires the Very Same Hour.

Posted: 18th December 2012 by admin in Oath or Affirmation

Comments Off

Douglas County, Nebraska, Head Prosecutor, Martin Conboy, has his 29 year retirement party the same hour that I had him subpoenaed to appear to testify why he had no 4th Amendment “Oath or Affirmation” in the Official Record in support of the warrant issued for failure to appear on a traffic citation. I think it odd that after 29 years the subpoenaed Prosecutor and the Court and the people organizing his retirement (going away) party the very same hour that my trial was to start in which he was subpoenaed as my witness to testify why he violates the bill of rights by having warrants issued with no supporting oath or affirmation (affidavit) in the official record when a warrant was issued for my arrest. And the Court denied my, already served upon Conboy, subpoena, minutes before the trial was to start. Essentially the Court has no General Jurisdiction to issue a warrant without this affidavit signed by the arresting officer, nor does the Court have a valid criminal complaint (information) in record for that too must be supported by an affidavit by the arresting (charging) officer also.

Amendment IV- “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
We have sent this to Federal Prisoners and several were released immediately with no explanation and with no other appeals, challenges, or motions pending.

Paul Hansen

December 2012 – I have another identical case in Sarpy County, Nebraska, it has been 45 days under advisement, the Judge apparently does not know what to do.

No oath or affirmation was present in that case also, for the prosecutors affirmation will not meet the 4th Amendment for he is not a first hand witness.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Pay No Personal Property Tax.

Posted: 7th December 2012 by admin in Pay No Property Tax, Tax, Tax / Property

Comments Off

Ed,
If students are looking for success stories here is one of three major ones I have had applying my education from what I have learned as a student.

Below is the final letter I wrote for my daughter in Idaho concerning personal property tax. There were three letters total and two responses from the Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, after this letter all correspondence stopped and she has not heard from him for over two years.

I consider this a major success as she is a very visible and successful professional and would have been an easy target for a powerful Prosecuting Attorney. His second response was a threat to lien her home and then sell it at a tax sale but this was all huff and puff as she just sold her home last month and there was never a lien attached.

Powerful.

Gary
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–

September 8, 2010

Deputy Prosecuting Attorney
_________ County Assessor Office
County Courthouse – _______ Street
________, Idaho 83___
Dear Mr.___________,
I received your letter dated ___________. I want to make it very clear Mr. ______, I am not in any way unlawfully refusing, upon demand, to give to any county assessor, in the discharge of his/her official duties, a list of my personal property that would be subject to taxation, or to refuse to swear to such a list. I am simply requesting that I be provided with the written law from the Idaho Statutes and a verified document providing proof of the county assessor’s established Territorial Jurisdiction over my private home and the land on which it is built, with the commonly known identification of ____________Street, ________, Idaho.
As you know all written law, including the State of Idaho Statutes, must identify the territory to which it applies. This is known as Territorial Jurisdiction, which in any interaction with a government entity or employee, must be proven if requested. Your response letter made absolutely no reference to the specific written law that gives __________ County or a County employee Territorial Jurisdiction over me personally or the land I live on. Your response merely told me you “disagree” with the suggestion that the term “in the state” or “in this state” apply to personal property taxation but failed to support this “disagreement” with written law. As a licensed attorney for ________ County you certainly know that a written law is not law if it is ambiguous, and I can not imagine that the Idaho Statutes would not have a specific legal definition written in a complete English sentence conveying a complete and clear thought for the word/terms “State” / “state of Idaho” or “State of Idaho” / “in the state” or “in this state” / “include, included and including.” If you would kindly send to me these definitions, directly from the written law (not court decisions or precedence’s) in your next correspondence, it would be appreciated, as it would help answer and resolve the issue of Territorial Jurisdiction of _________ County.
As, the written law that you do quote has nothing to do with territorial jurisdiction and only serves to define the punishment that “________ County” can dole out to anyone who fails to file the “required” paperwork and pay the taxes deemed to be mandatory I am required to request the following:
You quote Idaho Statutes 63-302 as an authority. I have never received the formal statutory “notice” requiring a personal property owner to make a correct list of taxable personal property. Please send this specific statutory notice if I am within _______ County Territorial Jurisdiction.
You quote Idaho Statutes 18-6301 as an authority. I have never received the formal statutory “demand” to give to any county assessor a list of his property subject to taxation. Please send this specific statutory demand if I am within _________ County Territorial Jurisdiction.
Sincerely,
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Idaho Statutes

TITLE 63
REVENUE AND TAXATION
CHAPTER 3
ASSESSMENT OF REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY
63-302. List of taxable personal property. (1) The assessor shall leave at the office, place of business or residence of each personal property owner, or mail to such personal property owner at his last known post office address, a form with notice requiring such personal property owner to make a correct list of taxable personal property.

TITLE 18
CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS
CHAPTER 63
REVENUE AND TAXATION
18-6301. Taxation — Refusal to give assessor list of property. Every person who unlawfully refuses upon demand to give to any county assessor a list of his property subject to taxation, or to swear to such list, or who gives a false name, or fraudulently refuses to give his true name, to any assessor when demanded by such assessor in the discharge of his official duties, is guilty of a misdemeanor.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

PERSONAL SECESSION FROM THE UNION OF THE UNITED STATES?

Posted: 16th November 2012 by admin in Secession

Comments Off

WHAT IS THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF PERSONAL SECESSION FROM THE UNION OF THE UNITED STATES?
The issue of whether or not a State could secede from the first Union, the Confederacy, the United States of America, or the second Union of dependent federal States, was purportedly decided by the War Between the States, however, as that war was prosecuted using the power and authority of the unadopted Constitution of September 17, 1787 and Constitution of the United States, the right of a State to secede from either Union remains unsettled. Secession of a kind is readily available to any individual not confined to territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America.
The legal history and the official written record of the written law and government of the United States of America, after King George III is removed as the head of state and government , is found in the four Organic Laws of the United States of America. The first Organic Law recognizes the inherent freedom of all mankind in general and the American people in particular. The remaining three Organic Laws: the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777, the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 and the Constitution of September 17, 1787 are binding upon the two classes of States which constitute the two Unions. The inhabitants of those States and the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America are subject to the written law of those States and the United States of America while physically present on the territory belonging to the United States of America.
The right of the American people to be free from government regulation is expressly provided for in the provision for personal abstention from political life in Article IV of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777. These Articles, which are binding on all the member Confederate States, were the first written Constitution for the United States of America. The third Organic Law of the United States of America, the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787, was an act of the United States in Congress assembled, which was binding on the settlers and inhabitants of the District, soon to be known as the United States.
The Constitution of September 17, 1787, had it been legally adopted by the members of a government, would have been the Constitution for the United States of America, as the Preamble suggests, because the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 was then the Constitution of the United States of America. The purpose of the Constitution of September 17, 1787, when lawfully adopted, was to make permanent the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 as the Constitution of the United States. George Washington took the oral oath to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States,” however, adoption of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 failed when no one was bound by subscribed oath “to support this Constitution,” the Constitution of September 17, 1787.
The planned failure to adopt the Constitution of September 17, 1787 allowed the federal government, the United States of America, to begin the “administration” of the United States of America as if it were, the United States, the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America. Unrestrained by an adopted Constitution, the federal government has conflated the United States of America into the United States, the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America.
An unadopted Constitution of September 17, 1787, while still binding on the State governments, does not bind the people. The people either individually or en masse are free to “secede” from State Unions they were never a part of.
Secession from the Union of States constituted of the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America is accomplished by the individual severing all ties to the “quasi-government” headed by the President of the United States. Attaining the freedom and independence of a free inhabitant under Article IV of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 requires a basic understanding of all four Organic Laws.

If you wish to have a confident understanding of how to “succeed at seceding” be it individually or by mass, contact me, for only 50$ you can start the “Basic Course in Law and Government”.
Paul Hansen, pauljjhansen@hotmail.com

Click here to enroll / buy now –

“Basic Course in Law and Government”.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Citizen, How does one become a US Citizen by law?

Posted: 17th October 2012 by admin in Citizen vs Free Inhabitant process, Citizen vs. Free Inhabitant

Comments Off

When one is standing on land owned by the USA one is a temporary subject to the written laws of the US. This changes as soon as one steps off that land.

When one becomes a citizen of the US “by process” it takes “a process” to renounce citizenship.

The process of becoming a US citizen is found in US written law, as follows:

Statute at large to become a US citizen is “The act of Congress of April 14, 1802, 2 Stat. 153, c, 28, Statute 2165,.

“An alien may be admitted to become a citizen of the United States in the following manner, and not otherwise.”

1. “He shall, two Years at least prior to his admission, declare before a proper court his intention to become a citizen of the United States, and to renounce his allegiance to the potentate or sovereignty of which he may be at the time a citizen or subject.”

2. “He shall, at the time of his application to be admitted, declare, on oath, before some one of the court above specified, that he will support the Constitution of the United States, and that he absolutely and entirely renounces and abjures all allegiance and fidelity to every foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty; and particularly, by name . to the prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of which he was before a citizen or subject, which proceedings shall be recorded by the clerk of the court.”

3. “It shall be made to appear to the satisfaction of the court admitting such alien that he has resided within the United States five years at least, and within the state or territory where such court is at the time held one year at least and that during that time he has behaved as a man of good moral character, attached to the principles of the Constitution of the United States, and well disposed to the good order and happiness of the same; but the oath of the resident shall in no case be allowed to prove his residence.”

“An alien may be admitted to become a citizen of the United States in the following manner, and not otherwise.” [‘not otherwise’ means by no other way]

1. “He shall, two Years at least prior to his admission, declare before a proper court [a US Court] his intention to become a citizen of the United States, and to renounce his allegiance to the potentate or sovereignty of which he may be at the time a citizen or subject [In my case I would need to renounce my free inhabitant standing].”

3. “It shall be made to appear to the satisfaction of the court admitting such alien that he has resided [lived on land owned by the US] within the United States five years at least, and within the state or territory where such court is at the time held one year at least and that during that time he has behaved as a man of good moral character, attached to the principles of the Constitution of the United States, and well disposed to the good order and happiness of the same; but the oath of the resident shall in no case be allowed to prove his residence.” [residency must be supported by more than just his word]

>>

Therefore, all U.S. citizens [i.e. franchised citizens of the District of Columbia] residing in one of the states of the Union, are classified as property, as franchisee’s of the federal government, and as an “individual entity”. See Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773.

Under the “Buck Act”, 4 U.S.C.S. Secs. 105-113, the federal government has created a “Federal area” within the boundaries of all the several states. (In Nebraska that consists of about 1.4% of the land as of 2018.)

Being subject to US written law can be a very confined life, at times in history it required little, today it takes close to 50% of you labor/earnings, and they could by mere congressional vote demand 100%.

Possibly if one is born on USA owned land one needs to renounce citizenship and become a subject to the class of free inhabitants, I am not sure, nor know how/where one would do this. -Paul Hansen-

(The above 1802 written law has been amended slightly.)

Much of the above came from this article by the INFORMER. (Look for the 1-4-12 Post)

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Free Inhabitant

Search Freeinhabitant

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Categories

Motor Vehicle Code applied to “for hire” only.

Motor vehicle, defined.

You Can Carry a Concealed Gun in “Omaha”.

Why One Should Use Credit Unions and not National Banks

Pay No Sales Tax,

Traffic Infractions are not Criminal, says California Courts.

Only Citizens Can Legally Vote- most are not.

Hansen Subpoenas Head Prosecutor, He Retires the Very Same Hour.

Pay No Personal Property Tax.

PERSONAL SECESSION FROM THE UNION OF THE UNITED STATES?

Citizen, How does one become a US Citizen by law?

Social Connections

Recent Comments