20161003_121034

 

The automobile plate above reads as :

NOT FOR HIRE

In accordance to the California Court of Appeals:  Government Employees Insurance Co vs Carrier Ins. Co  1975 Cal. App. 3D 223

Notice to individuals or govt. agencies; owner of record reg. @ https://freeinhabitant.info/?p=64

>>

My friends have driven with such plates as above for years with no (little) intervention from the California Police.  Police pull up behind my friends, read the notice, they turn left and the cops turn right.  California is one of the few states that have clear right to travel language in their codes.

>>

-California Department of Motor Vehicles-

V C Section 260 Commercial Vehicle

Commercial Vehicle

260.  (a) A “commercial vehicle” is a motor vehicle of a type required to be registered under this code used or maintained for the transportation of persons for hire, compensation, or profit or designed, used, or maintained primarily for the transportation of property.

(b) Passenger vehicles and house cars that are not used for the transportation of persons for hire, compensation, or profit are not commercial vehicles. This subdivision shall not apply to Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 6700) of Division 3.

(c) Any vanpool vehicle is not a commercial vehicle.  (Vanpool is a vehicle used to pool groups of people together and transport to work.)

(d) The definition of a commercial vehicle in this section does not apply to Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 15200) of Division 6.

Amended Sec. 11, Ch. 861, Stats. 2000. Effective September 28, 2000. Operative December 31, 2001.

Amended Sec. 1, Ch. 222, Stats. 2002. Effective January 1, 2003.

>>

V C Section 415 Motor Vehicle

Motor Vehicle

415.  (a) A “motor vehicle” is a vehicle that is self-propelled.

(b) “Motor vehicle” does not include a self-propelled wheelchair, motorized tricycle, or motorized quadricycle, if operated by a person who, by reason of physical disability, is otherwise unable to move about as a pedestrian.

(c) For purposes of Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 3000) of Division 2, “motor vehicle” includes a recreational vehicle as that term is defined in subdivision (a) of Section 18010 of the Health and Safety Code, but does not include a truck camper.

Amended Sec. 1, Ch. 703, Stats. 2003. Effective January 1, 2004.

Amended Sec. 1, Ch. 404, Stats. 2004. Effective January 1, 2005.

 

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Comments Off on Bang, Hansen Out of Jail by Habeas

August 1, 2011 I, Paul John Hansen was pulled over for expired plates, cited for expired plates-registration, no insurance, suspended license. Fought it on every level, primarily no oath or affirmation pursuant to the 4th Amendment and the 1905 legislative bill “for hire”.

Judge gave me 29 days, placed in jail on the date of April 18, 2013, years later.

April 19, 2013  I noticed the Sarpy County Jail Warden that “he” was holding me without law and the damages are 3000$ per day, and triple damages upon notice if ignored.

Warden assistant came and talked to me for an hour, saying that he was very interested in my case arguments of right to travel in a not for hire capacity and asked how I derived the damages.

April 23 I put in a Habeas, judge called me to a private hearing and let me out immediately, adding that I need to get a license by June 27, 2013, I responded that I would have to lie and state that I was a resident within a US territory and a US Citizen to qualify for a state operators license.

If you want the entire file, jurisdictional challenges, briefs, judicial notices, supporting case laws, can not pay fines for no “money of account” argument, etc.,  just email me and ask for the Sarpy Case with a 5$ payment.

Pay 5$ here by clicking on >

NOTICE – 3-24-14 – Due to recent difficulties with Paypal send all payment by mailing money orders payable to Paul John Hansen, mailing address 1548 N 19, Omaha, NE 68110.

” title=”Sarpy Case”>Paypal.

-Do remember that these small 5$ payments is what helps keeping me in the (our) fight.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

To:

Dave Heineman

State of Nebraska Governor

Office of the Governor
P.O. Box 94848
Lincoln, NE 68509-4848

Mailed April 10, 2013   (□ mailing affidavit attached)

From:

Paul John Hansen

1548 N 19th Street,

Omaha, Nebraska 68110,

without the United States.

RE: Notice to Governor, Dave Heineman, of the State of Nebraska of ongoing violations of my right to travel on the open passageways of Nebraska.

Attached, EXHIBIT “L1”, you will see a letter evidenced (video recorded) as being mailed to you, no response has been received from your office as of this letter.

As Governor of the State of Nebraska I must inform you that the acts that you have allowed your agents, as they are operating on the land called Nebraska, have consistently violated my rights as a free inhabitant.  Specifically, my right to pass upon the open highways of Nebraska, in a not “for hire” capacity.  I to my knowledge I never travel on land that is owned by the “State” of Nebraska, or more accurately land owned by “The United States of America” within the exterior boundaries of Nebraska.  But I do pass on open roads that are municipalities of various cities / counties in the said Nebraska territory.

As I pass over these open roads, as not “for hire”, I have been harassed by agents that claim to be officially operating under your employment.  These agents claim that they have instructions to regulate my travel by imposing Nebraska Legislative written law from what they call the Motor Vehicles written laws found in the said Legislatures depository of written law upon my activity, my automobile, and me personally.

These same agents, City of Omaha Police Officers, Nebraska State Patrol, Douglas County Sheriff, Sarpy County Sheriff, and others, demand that I must have the following to travel in my not “for hire” capacity:

  1. That I must have a State of Nebraska Operators License,
  2. That I must have proof of liability insurance for my automobile,
  3. That my automobile must be registered and have current state plates.

I am regularly harassed by your agents.  They have written citations and delivered me for prosecution by county prosecutors in United States courts called county courts.  They have towed my automobiles, fined me, arrested me, and imprisoned me, all under the false pretense of regulation under the State of Nebraska Motor Vehicle legislative bills.

I have duly noticed the said prosecutors and the courts, by certified copies, in open courts of record, as judicial notice, as offered exhibit, of the following:

Motor Vehicles

Chapter 129

5388o Sec. 150 [Municipal ordinances.]

(House Role No. 146)

[Introduced by Mr. Hand]

A Bill – FOR AN ACT requiring registration of motor vehicles and regulating their use or operation upon the highways or streets.

Laws of Nebraska of 1905

**Specific attention to – 5388o Sec. 150 [Municipal ordinances.]

As you will see that the Motor Vehicles laws have a subject clearly embodied in the bill, that is “for hire”.  Being that the State of Nebraska state Constitution clearly limits each bill to be of a ***“single subject”, therefore to have the Motor Vehicles law to apply there must be an activity of “for hire” as to all application of the titled Motor Vehicle law.

I demand you respond immediately, for on the date of 4-18-2013 Sarpy County intends on jailing me for violating the Motor Vehicles laws even though the official record clearly evidenced by the arresting officer that no “for hire” activity is related.

Your perpetual allowance to such harassment, deprivation of rights, false arrest, false prosecution, false imprisonment, extortion, can only be done in your private capacity, for the written law dose not authorize such regulation upon ones acts evidenced as not “for hire”.

THIS NOTICE/COMPLAINT IS AN AFFIDAVIT OF OBLIGATION IN THE NORMAL COMMERCIAL SENSE AND AS SUCH IS A SECURITY REPRESENTING ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE. ANY FAILURE OR REFUSAL TO PROSECUTE YOUR DUTY RELEASES JURISDICTION TO ME.

Contact Sarpy County prosecutor immediately and inform them of their misapplication of the Motor Vehicles written laws as associated to State of Nebraska v. Paul John Hansen, Case number- CR/TR 11-5285.

Ledger of Damages are 100 US Dollars each day my right to travel has been deprived, 647 days = $64,700.00 total damages to date.

Right to travel is not to be regulated except by common law principals.

 

___________________   Paul John Hansen, as a free inhabitant, as the term is found in Art. 4 of the Articles of Confederation.

**5388o Sec. 150 [Municipal ordinances.] Cities and towns shall have no power to pass, in force or maintain any ordinance, rule or regulation requiring of any owner or operator of a motor vehicle any license or permit to use the public highways or exclude or prohibit any motor vehicle whose owner has complied with section two (2) or section four (4) of this act from the free use of such highways, and all such ordinances, rules or regulations now in force, are hereby declared to be of no validity or effect: provided that nothing in this act shall be construed as limiting the power of local authorities to make and force and maintain an ordinance, rule or regulations, in addition to the provisions of this act, affecting motor vehicles which are offered to the public for hire. [I.d., § 11.]

–Proof of Service / Notice, Aided administrative by Notary Public–

  This Affidavit is submitted for the record as facts that are currently known by Steven xxxxxx, a Notary Public, and are directly related to the attached Certified Mailing with Return Receipt US Postal Service mailing, as preformed on __-__-2013, to the below listed addressed individual.

1. Affiant shall hereinafter mean Steven xxxxxx.

2. That Affiant is acting as a Notary Public for evidence of service / notice / administratively, with the attached documents, process, notice, presentment.

3. That the attached mailing contents were mailed to the following:    Dave Heineman

Office of the Governor, P.O. Box 94848   Lincoln, NE68509-4848.

Registered Mailing No. 7011-1570-0002-8480-9074 on __-__ -2013.

4. That Affiant loaded the above listed addressed envelope with all original ink signed documents, as hereto attached, and then Affiant sealed the envelope and delivered the same to the UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE for mailing, with post paid for mailing on the date of __-__-2013.

5. That Affiant / Notary entered in his Register Log Book what was sealed / mailed, as __-__-2013 (__) total individual pages, (EXHIBIT “____” as  __ pages) in the said Certified Mailing envelope, with mailing reference numbers, exact copy retained.

5a. That the contents of mailing where: __ page document entitled case 11-4161.

6. Total mailings are as followed: a. __ page NOTICE, time stamped by the court on the date of __-__-2013. b. __ page NOTICE in affidavit form. c. __ page this Mailing Affidavit, as signed.

I, Steven xxxxxx declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing Affidavit is true and correct. Executed on __ day of the __ month of 2013.  Jurat:  As sworn to before the below signed Notary this __ day of __ month, 2013, Oath: I, Steven xxxxxx, solemnly swear that the contents of the above mailing Affidavit subscribed is correct and true.

______________________________

                                                                                   Mailing Affiant – Steven xxxxxx

State of Nebraska

County of Douglas

Personally appeared before me the undersigned, an officer authorized to administer oaths, Steven xxxxxx, with valid identification, and/or personally known to me, who first being duly sworn, deposes and says that the forgoing, __ page, instrument was subscribed and sworn before me, this __ day of __ Month 2013.

___________________________  Notary

□ Original is retained fully signed by Steve xxxxxx, in ink, and said signature was fully verified by notary signature with notary seal.  □ Green Card Retained.

>>>

***State of Nebraska Constitution 1875-  III-14. Bills and resolutions read by title; printing; vote for final passage; bills to contain one subject; amended section to be set forth; signing of bills.

Every bill and resolution shall be read by title when introduced, and a printed copy thereof provided for the use of each member. The bill and all amendments thereto shall be printed and presented before the vote is taken upon its final passage and shall be read at large unless three-fifths of all the members elected to the Legislature vote not to read the bill and all amendments at large. No vote upon the final passage of any bill shall be taken until five legislative days after its introduction nor until it has been on file for final reading and passage for at least one legislative day. No bill shall contain more than one subject, and the subject shall be clearly expressed in the title. No law shall be amended unless the new act contains the section or sections as amended and the section or sections so amended shall be repealed. The Lieutenant Governor, or the Speaker if acting as presiding officer, shall sign, in the presence of the Legislature while it is in session and capable of transacting business, all bills and resolutions passed by the Legislature.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Sure you can fight city hall and lose, but you can win, if you just learn how to put the city in its place.
States incorporate cities as commercial enterprises with municipal purposes using the same power with which they charter purely commercial enterprises. Where is this power to create commercial enterprises found?
We must look to the Organic Laws of the United States of America for the origin of all delegations of power from the American people, and when we look there we find the people of the States have delegated all they are capable of delegating in the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777.
The free inhabitants of the United States of America are not only free to exercise their unalienable rights they must do so to remain free. In short, the people of the United States of America have the unalienable right to govern themselves as individuals, but that right does not extend to others. No majority of any size has the right to govern by force.
Majority rule has been imposed by the States in the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America acting as the Confederacy pursuant to the authority of the Articles of Confederation. However, that majority rule is subject to the limitations imposed by the Constitution of the United States, the Constitution which resulted when nine States ratified the Constitution of September 17, 1787.
The Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reserves to the States or to the people the power to incorporate cities, however, that power is limited to the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America, as expressed in the Constitution of the United States.
The key to putting any city in its federal place lies in learning the Organic Laws of the United States of America. I offer the only Internet law course on that subject. To learn how you can try out the $500 Basic Course in Law and Government for $50 contact me at pauljjhansen@hotmail.com
(((Comments by Paul Hansen, so when a city police officer pulls you over for no plates, for example, on one of the city streets (municipalities), they can not impose state statutes there unless the land is owned by the USA, which it almost never is. They can only impose common law, and common law requires a damaged party or reckless endangerment judged by a jury of non-US citizens. The city will not want to go there.)))

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

STATE POWER TO TAX US PROPERTY?

Posted: 2nd April 2013 by admin in Pay No Property Tax
Comments Off on STATE POWER TO TAX US PROPERTY?

The Office of the Los Angeles County Tax Assessor makes this bold claim on its website: “State law mandates that all property is subject to taxation unless otherwise exempted. Your property taxes support necessary services provided to the residents of Los Angeles County. These include law enforcement, fire protection, education, parks and recreation, and other vital services.”

To what state law does the LA Tax Assessor refer?

CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE 13 TAXATION

SEC. 1. Unless otherwise provided by this Constitution or the laws of the United States:

(a) All property is taxable and shall be assessed at the same percentage of fair market value. When a value standard other than fair market value is prescribed by this Constitution or by statute authorized by this Constitution, the same percentage shall be applied to determine the assessed value. The value to which the percentage is applied, whether it be the fair market value or not, shall be known for property tax purposes as the full value.

(b) All property so assessed shall be taxed in proportion to its full value.

What doesn’t the Assessor tell you?

The Assessor doesn’t explain why only personal property located within the federal territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America might be subject to forced taxation. The government of the State of California within California is the only one which has been authorized by Congress to tax property within the State of California, however, because the State of California is the designation for the federal territory, within California, owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America, only non-federal personal property can be taxed. Before admission into the second Union, a State must promise not to tax federal property, which leaves only the personal property not owned by the United States of America subject to property taxation.

CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SEC. 1. The State of California is an inseparable part of the United States of America, and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land.

The above sentence means the State of California is the same kind of federal territory made a permanent part of the Confederacy by Article 4 of the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787, so only non-governmental personal property located on the federal territory within California is taxable.

Joining the Confederacy under the authority of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 did not require any transfer of territory within that State. Territory claimed by a State of the first Union, the United States of America, which had been ceded to the Confederacy became a permanent part of the Confederacy pursuant to Article 4 of the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787. The Northwest Territory was comprised of what would be the States of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, and part of Minnesota, so it can readily be seen how the term “United States” would come to mean the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America. The territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America is also “the United States Constitution” George Washington swore to “preserve, protect and defend.”

Once the American people freed themselves from the British tyrant, King George III, only force could openly subject them to the same kind of blatant tyranny. The Confederation Congress, George Washington and the politicians of the time managed to re-install the same kind of government which had been expelled by a violent revolution, without firing a shot.

Using trickery and deceit, it only took a few Americans, who could keep a secret, led by George Washington to replace American freedom with one onerous central government.  Lawyer Ed Rivera’s “Basic Course in Law and Government” explains how George Washington created the American Presidential dictatorship and his “Advanced Course in Law and Government” helps Students achieve near total freedom. A $50 trial version of the $500 Basic Course, to join the class contact pauljjhansen@hotmail.com today.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Comments Off on No Sworn Complaint is no Complaint.

The product M1S-15 provides guidance into going for damages for unlawful arrest, which always lack probable cause, and a verified complaint in affidavit form.

Look at this statute for ordinance violations in Missouri state law.

 

Arrest without warrants, procedure.

479.110. The city marshal, chief of police or other police officer of

any municipality shall, without a warrant, make arrests of any person

who commits an offense in his presence, but such officer shall, before

the trial, file a written complaint with the judge hearing violations of

municipal ordinances.

 

(The complaint is a written statement of the essential facts constitution the offense charged.  It must be made under oath before a magistrate judge.  Rule 3 – Federal Rules Criminal Procedure)

 

(Most arrest in all 50 states are only associated with a un-sworn police report.  If challenged it can be proven that due process has occurred and therefore the court lost jurisdiction, at that moment, and all subsequent judgments are  a nullity.)

( So lets say you are arrested, booked, and bonded out, for no operators license, if you are not a “person’ by statute, I believe they, arresting officer, must submit the written complaint by oath as a man. This is presumed to be due in all jurisdictions of the United States jurisdictions/acts.)

 

>>>>

29-404.02. Nebraska

Arrest without warrant; when.

(1) Except as provided in section 42-928 ( < restraining order violation), a peace officer may arrest a person without a warrant if the officer has reasonable cause to believe that such person has committed:

(a) A felony;

(b) A misdemeanor, and the officer has reasonable cause to believe that such person either (i) will not be apprehended unless immediately arrested, (ii) may cause injury to himself or herself or others or damage to property unless immediately arrested, (iii) may destroy or conceal evidence of the commission of such misdemeanor, or (iv) has committed a misdemeanor in the presence of the officer; or

(c) One or more of the following acts to one or more household members, whether or not committed in the presence of the peace officer:

(i) Attempting to cause or intentionally and knowingly causing bodily injury with or without a dangerous instrument;

(ii) Placing, by physical menace, another in fear of imminent bodily injury; or

(iii) Engaging in sexual contact or sexual penetration without consent as defined in section 28-318.

(2) For purposes of this section:

(a) Household members shall include spouses or former spouses, children, persons who are presently residing together or who have resided together in the past, persons who have a child in common whether or not they have been married or have lived together at any time, other persons related by consanguinity or affinity, and persons who are presently involved in a dating relationship with each other or who have been involved in a dating relationship with each other; and

(b) Dating relationship means frequent, intimate associations primarily characterized by the expectation of affectional or sexual involvement, but does not include a casual relationship or an ordinary association between persons in a business or social context.

Source

Annotations

  • 1. Felony

  • 2. Misdemeanor

  • 3. Probable cause

  • 4. Miscellaneous

  • 1. Felony

  • When a law enforcement officer has knowledge based on information reasonably trustworthy under the circumstances, which justifies a prudent belief that a suspect has committed a felony, the officer has probable cause to arrest without a warrant. State v. Robinson, 233 Neb. 729, 448 N.W.2d 386 (1989).

  • A peace officer may arrest without a warrant if the officer has reasonable cause to believe that the person to be arrested has committed a felony. State v. Horn, 218 Neb. 524, 357 N.W.2d 437 (1984); State v. George, 210 Neb. 786, 317 N.W.2d 76 (1982); State v. Russ, 193 Neb. 308, 226 N.W.2d 775 (1975); State v. Irwin, 191 Neb. 169, 214 N.W.2d 595 (1974); State v. Beasley, 183 Neb. 681, 163 N.W.2d 783 (1969).

  • 2. Misdemeanor

  • There is probable cause for a warrantless arrest under subsection (2)(c) of this section when an officer has reasonable cause to believe that a misdemeanor has been committed and there is reasonable cause to believe that the evidence may be destroyed or concealed. There is reasonable cause to believe that evidence of intoxication may be destroyed by the metabolic processes of the human body. State v. Halligan, 222 Neb. 866, 387 N.W.2d 698 (1986).

  • This section authorizes any peace officer to arrest a person who commits a misdemeanor in his presence. State v. Chambers, 207 Neb. 611, 299 N.W.2d 780 (1980).

  • Police may use binoculars in surveillance, and may arrest without a warrant if there is reasonable cause to believe person has committed misdemeanor in their presence, or has committed misdemeanor, and officers have reasonable cause to believe evidence may be destroyed or concealed. State v. Thompson, 196 Neb. 55, 241 N.W.2d 511 (1976).

  • Peace officer may arrest without a warrant if he has reasonable cause to believe the person has committed a misdemeanor, that he will not be apprehended or may cause injury to others unless immediately arrested, or may destroy or conceal evidence of the commission of the misdemeanor. State v. McCune, 189 Neb. 165, 201 N.W.2d 852 (1972).

  • A law enforcement officer may make a lawful arrest without a warrant if there exists a reasonable or probable cause that a person has committed a misdemeanor in the officer’s presence. Newton v. Huffman, 10 Neb. App. 390, 632 N.W.2d 344 (2001).

  • 3. Probable cause

  • The test for probable cause for a warrantless arrest is whether at the moment the facts and circumstances within the officers’ knowledge and of which they had reasonably trustworthy information were sufficient to warrant a prudent man in believing that the petitioner had committed or was committing an offense. State v. Jones, 208 Neb. 641, 305 N.W.2d 355 (1981).

  • Where defendant’s erratic driving and subsequent conduct is sufficient to give police probable cause to believe defendant was under the influence of drugs or liquor, it is permissible for the police to pursue defendant into a private dwelling. State v. Penas, 200 Neb. 387, 263 N.W.2d 835 (1978).

  • Probable cause for arrest and for search and seizure exists where the facts and circumstances within the officers’ knowledge and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information are sufficient in themselves to warrant a man of reasonable caution to believe that an offense has been or is being committed. State v. Dussault, 193 Neb. 122, 225 N.W.2d 558 (1975).

  • Probable cause for arrest is to be determined upon objective facts available at time of arrest but there is no requirement that before arrest officer must conduct trial. Morrison v. United States, 491 F.2d 344 (8th Cir. 1974).

  • Arresting officer not being present at time offense committed and under facts outlined without probable cause for warrantless arrest, evidence seized on search incident to arrest was inadmissible. Turk v. United States, 429 F.2d 1327 (8th Cir. 1970).

  • 4. Miscellaneous

  • Although the diminishment over time and the ultimate elimination of alcohol in the bloodstream are not willful or intentional, this metabolic process nonetheless constitutes the destruction of evidence such as to provide a basis for effecting a warrantless arrest under the provisions of this section. State v. Wegener, 239 Neb. 946, 479 N.W.2d 783 (1992).

  • The destruction of evidence through the dissipation of an individual’s blood-alcohol level over time is sufficient justification for a warrantless arrest. State v. Marcotte, 233 Neb. 533, 446 N.W.2d 228 (1989).

  • A warrantless arrest, set in motion on a public road, may not be defeated by means of escaping to a private driveway. State v. Bishop, 224 Neb. 522, 399 N.W.2d 271 (1987).

  • Officer’s conduct in making an arrest under the apparent authority of sections 29-404.02 and 29-411 did not rise to the level of conscious or flagrant misconduct requiring prophylactic exclusion of the defendant’s statements. State v. Smith, 209 Neb. 505, 308 N.W.2d 820 (1981).

  • Warrantless arrest was lawful after officer discovered small bag of marijuana in “plain view” in back seat of car driven by defendant, thereby permitting a search of the car’s trunk as a search incident to a lawful arrest. State v. Watts, 209 Neb. 371, 307 N.W.2d 816 (1981).

  • A warrantless arrest in the hallway outside the apartment of the person arrested, which took place as the person arrested was returning to his apartment, does not violate this section. State v. Tipton, 206 Neb. 731, 294 N.W.2d 869 (1980).

  • Absent exigent circumstances police may not arrest a person in his home without a warrant. State v. Schlothauer, 206 Neb. 670, 294 N.W.2d 382 (1980).

  • Absent a contrary showing, an arrest made by Nebraska authorities in a neighboring jurisdiction is presumed governed by laws the same as laws in Nebraska. State v. Wilson, 199 Neb. 765, 261 N.W.2d 376 (1978).

  • Exigent circumstances in this case justified entry into house to make arrest without a prior disclosure of authority or purpose. State v. Brooks, 189 Neb. 592, 204 N.W.2d 86 (1973).

>>>>

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Comments Off on Lance Jesse 37 yr. Son Evicts 74 yr. Parents off 10,000 acre Ranch, Nebraska.

Brief prepared by Paul John Hansen as Aiding Counsel.

TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF SHERIDAN COUNTY, NEBRASKA

LANCE R. JESSE and SHARON J. ) Case No. CI 13-16
JESSE, husband and wife, )
)
Plaintiffs, )
)
VS. ) Territorial Jurisdiction
) Challenge
EDMOND R. JESSE and )
KATHLEEN M. JESSE, husband )
and wife, )
)
alleged Defendants. )
The Signed, Edmond R. Jesse and Kathleen M. Jesse, as ‘free inhabitants’ as the term is used in the Articles of Confederation 1777, now challenges the Plaintiffs to produce evidence on the record of the following:
a. Proof that the land claimed, as owned, by the Plaintiff, is land that is a possession or territory of the United States.
b. Proof that the above captioned court has jurisdiction over land that is not a possession or territory of the United States.
c. Proof that the land claimed, as owned, by the Plaintiff, is land that is in the scope of jurisdiction of the DISTRICT COURT OF SHERIDAN COUNTY, NEBRASKA, as captioned, as utilized by the Plaintiff.
d. Proof that the DISTRICT COURT OF SHERIDAN COUNTY, NEBRASKA, as captioned, has jurisdiction on land that is not a possession or territory of the United States.
e. Plaintiff’s attorney has authority to practice law by his license on land that is not a possession or territory of the United States, and that the licensed attorney has permissions to apply State statutes / written law of Nebraska upon the subject land that is not a possession or territory of the United States.
f. That Plaintiff’s own the subject property in their private capacity.
Edmond R. Jesse and Kathleen M. Jesse demands that this action/motion RESTITUTION OF PREMISES, as brought by Plaintiffs, this day of March 26, 2013, be discontinued until Plaintiffs provide this Court with sufficiency of territorial jurisdiction, and standing as owner, to invoke the Courts general jurisdiction, and subject matter jurisdiction.
See attached – Memorandum of Fact, Agreement, and Law, Supported by Affidavit, with notice of damages, with NOTICE. The judge is to take judicial notice of the written law and applicable case law in the presented Memorandum of Law.

Prepared and presented by _____________________ Edmond R. Jesse
and
Prepared and presented by ____________________ Kathleen M. Jesse
1838 405th Trl
Ellsworth, NE 69340
308-762-1717

Certificate of Service

CURTISS, (Terry) MORAVEK & CURTISS, PC, LLO
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
416 NIOBRARA AVENUE – P.O. Box 460
ALLIANCE, NEBRASKA 69301-0460
TELEPHONE: 308-762-1710
FAX 308-762-1712

 

 
TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF SHERIDAN COUNTY, NEBRASKA

LANCE R. JESSE and SHARON J. ) Case No. CI 13-16
JESSE, husband and wife, )
)
Plaintiffs, )
)
VS. ) Territorial Jurisdiction
) Supporting:
EDMOND R. JESSE and )
KATHLEEN M. JESSE, husband )
and wife, )
)
Defendants. )

Memorandum of Fact, Agreement, and Law,
Supported by Affidavit, with notice of damages.
NOTICE – All administrators are to take notice of all pertinent written law herein.
In support of the attached Territorial Jurisdiction Challenge.

No attorney, court administrator, or executor (sheriff), can act without general jurisdiction/authority/permission in any capacity without personal commercial liability, foremost after due notice.

1. Premise: To prove that the following four Organic Laws are evidence that the land must be owned under the precise styled name of “The United States of America” for any written law of any “United States” state legislative body, including but not limited to “Nebraska Legislature”, to have force and effect of law, within the exterior borders of Nebraska.

2. The United States Code, which is revised and published every six years, is the written law which implements all authority pursuant to, and contained within, the United States Constitution. This Code references the four “Organic Laws” – none of which show evidence of being repealed as of 25 day of 3rd Month of 2013 – as:
a. Declaration of Independence, 1776
b. Articles of Confederation, 1777
c. Northwest Ordinance, 1787
d. Constitution for The United States of America, 1787

3. Declaration of Independence,1776. [Americas War for Independence] The document called Declaration of Independence, created and presented by Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled on July 4, 1776 declares independence from all governance not consented to. . . . “that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. . . . that to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”

I/we, Edmond R. Jesse and Kathleen M. Jesse, are, and remain, a “free inhabitant”, not one who resides on land owned by the United States of America, and having never consented to be governed by full disclosure. I/we have never “resided” in, or “of”, the United States and have always been domiciled outside the territory owned by and subject to the exclusive legislative authority of the United States of America. [Consent can only be valid if accompanied with full disclosure.]

4. Articles of Confederation, 1777
ARTICLE I- “The Stile of this Confederacy shall be ‘The United States of America’.”
ARTICLE IV- “The better to secure and perpetuate mutual friendship and intercourse among the people of the different States in this Union, the free inhabitants of each of these States,…” “…shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several States;…”

5. [Officially titled:] “An Ordinance for the Government of the Territory of the United States North-West of the River Ohio”, the Northwest Ordinance was passed on July 13, 1787. Paragraph 1- “for the purposes of temporary government”

6. “Constitution for the United States of America,” of September 17, 1787- as amended 1791 (Bill of Rights) (Bill of Restrictions upon the subject Government)
a. Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 17: “To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;…And”

b. Notice that the Preamble states “for” in the sentence “. . . do ordain and establish this Constitution “for” the United States of America.” This indicates that the Document constitutes (includes) specific written law, specific inhabiting people, and specific land, for the said named Confederacy, and does not create a new confederacy. Therefore this new union is generally called the “United States,” often being a clear distinction from The United States of America, the Confederacy.

c. Notice in the above Paragraph 17- “Legislative Authority” [only] includes, and is extended to, land gained only by Cession and/or by being a Place(s) purchased. Therefore this written law does not give legislative authority over land that is not possessed / purchased, or has not been acquired by cession, by the United States. That being said, if land is not acquired either by cession, or by purchase, by the United States it is then “not” a possession or territory of the United States, and is not “of” such land that is a possession or territory “of” the United States.

7. In summary, any land within the exterior boundaries of Nebraska that is not ceded to or purchased by the United States of America does not constitute land or property categorized as within “a possession or territory of the United States” – it is OUTSIDE of the United States. Thus, any act that occurs on land not a possession or territory of the United States is not within the legislative authority (jurisdiction) of the United States.
If the subject land of this case is not of the US then the/a US court can not have any type of jurisdiction without consent in full disclosure. The captioned court is a US court.

8. Activity only on land that is a possession or territory of the United States, or which affects the United States has the possibility of being within the scope of the Legislative Authority of the United States Courts / Administrations. Conversely, land that is not a possession or territory of the United States, or which does not affect the United States, has no possibility of being within the scope of the Legislative Authority of the United States Courts / Administrations.

9. When challenged in a United States Court, the burden of proof of who owns the land is upon the moving party (Plaintiff). Ignoring such a challenge, by notice, the United States Officers, Administrators, and Employees, have no immunity and are liable and responsible in their personal commercial capacity for causing damages or injuries.

“A plaintiff must plead and prove the jurisdictional facts, the facts which show that the court has jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action.” Paulsen v. Paulsen, 658 N.W.2d 49, Neb. App. 2003

“Once jurisdiction is challenged, the party cannot proceed when it clearly appears that the court lacks jurisdiction, the court has no authority to reach merits, but rather, should dismiss the action.” Melo v. US 505 F2d 1026.

Listed obligated parties are, but not limited to: LANCE R. JESSE and SHARON J. JESSE, and Terry Curtiss.

10. NOTICE: THIS IS AN OFFICIAL COUNTER-FORFEITURE CLAIM FOR DAMAGES AGAINST THE ABOVE NAMED DEFENDANTS AND / OR OBLIGATED PARTIES, AS WELL AS A NOTICE OF INTENT TO LIEN, AND IS INTENDED TO MEET ALL NOTICE REQUIREMENTS FOR ADDITIONAL LAWFUL ACTION AGAINST THEM SHOULD FURTHER PURSUIT BECOME NECESSARY.

12. Further Clarification- All legislative written laws in America are limited in their application by the Organic Laws of the United States of America to the territory owned by the United States of America and the inhabitants of that territory. See – Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 17, US Constitution.

13. Article IV of the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 makes provision for the inclusion of the States of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, and part of Minnesota as part of the Confederacy and the taxation of the inhabitants of that territory: “The said territory, and the States which may be formed therein, shall forever remain a part of this Confederacy of the United States of America, subject to the Articles of Confederation, and to such alterations therein as shall be constitutionally made; and to all the acts and ordinances of the United States in Congress assembled, conformable thereto.” See – Paragraph 14 of the first part of The North West Ordinance.

14. “The inhabitants and settlers in the said territory shall be subject to pay a part of the federal debts contracted or to be contracted, and a proportional part of the expenses of government, to be apportioned on them by Congress according to the same common rule and measure by which apportionments thereof shall be made on the other States;” See – Art. 4. The Northwest Ordinance.

15. The temporary law of the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 quoted above was made permanent in Article I Section 8 of the Constitution of September 17, 1787: “The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;”

16. The term: “United States” in Article I Section 8 of the Constitution of the United States can only refers to the territory belonging to the United States of America, which remains subject to the exclusive legislative power of the Congress of the United States whom is popularly elected by citizens of the United States.

17. The United States is Washington, D.C. and every other place in the world where there are Americans and the land those Americans occupy as territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America.

18. The United States of America began as an upstart nation with the announcement in the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776 of a formal unilateral political separation from Great Britain and King George III. There immediately followed documentary evidence of the initiation of the permanent formation of a Confederacy to be known as “The United States of America” i.e., The Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777. Although quickly ratified on December 16, 1777, by Virginia, it would take until March 1, 1781, for Maryland, the thirteenth State to ratify the Articles of Confederation into full force.

19. Military victory over Great Britain in America, unquestionably recognized as one of the five greatest liberations of the history of the world, meant the United States of America was destined to be a great nation among the other nations (unified peoples) of the world. The Treaty of Paris of 1783 would provide the Confederacy, the United States of America, the opportunity to claim what it lacked and what the other nations of the world had as a matter of course—territory, and with it the power to legislate and the power to tax (govern) in that territory.

20. Logically, as proprietor of the said Northwest Territory and the land ceded to the United States of America by some of the States, the United States in Congress assembled had all the power and authority it needed to administer the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America. The Confederation Congress used this power and authority to establish a temporary government for the Northwest Territory by enacting the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787.

21. It is obvious today that the Confederation Congress had planned the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 to be the third Organic Law a couple of months ahead of the fourth Organic Law, the Constitution of September 17, 1787. See – http://uscode.house.gov/uscode-cgi/fastweb.exe?getdoc+uscview+uscnst+2+5++%28organic%20law

22. Just as the Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confederation are perfectly paired to secure the freedoms of all Americans by denying/limiting the national government taxing and lawmaking power, the Northwest Ordinance and the Constitution of the United States are uniquely mated to subject all Americans to laws and taxes which apply only in the United States or only to “citizens of the United States.”

23. Article 4 of the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787: “The said territory, and the States which may be formed therein, shall forever remain a part of this Confederacy of the United States of America, subject to the Articles of Confederation, and to such alterations therein as shall be constitutionally made.” The State of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, and part of Minnesota are the first United States which belongs to the United States of America. Alterations can simply mean enlargement when adding more territory or states to the First Union, as has been done over the past 200 plus years.

24. Whether individual members of Congress know it or not, every law passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate and signed by the President of the United States is limited to the United States territory, or to citizens of the United States. The Article I Section 1 lawmaking power in the Constitution of the United States: “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives,” have always been limited by the Northwest Ordinance to the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America. See Article I Section 1, US Constitution.

25. “The United States of America” remains “the Confederacy” and as such is a government in the present 50 states. For more clarification- those 50 states, each having a varying portion of land dedicated for United States purpose / defense activity, and that same limited portion of land in each of the 50 state being recognized / recorded as owned under the name, style, as “The United States of America”.

26. All land having a titled owner as, for example- “CITY OF OMAHA”, “COUNTY OF SHERIDAN”, “STATE OF NEBRASKA”, and LANCE R. JESSE and/or SHARON J. JESSE, are lands not evidenced as owned by “The United States of America”, therefore are not lands governed by United States written law, and are lands not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States Courts / Administrations (state statutory eviction).

27. All land of what was once referred to as “Nebraska Territory” was a result of a purchase made by The United States of America from France by/through the “Louisiana Purchase of 1803”. All land of the same Nebraska Territory that now has a one time created United States Land Patent is evidence of being sold by the United States of America. Thus being from that point on is fact proof that The United States of America is no longer the owner of that portion of land, as specifically described in a given Land Patent, and it has given up all proprietary ownership, including exclusive Legislative Authority over such land.

28. Unless a valid claim is made (deed), and proven when challenged, any land that has had an existing US Land Patent and subsequently been re-purchased by The United States of America, that same land is not legally evidenced as being “of” the United States. No deed can, by it’s language can change the fact that it is, or is not, a possession or territory of the United States, the fact that it is prevails.

29. That the land (hereafter as Jesse’s Ranch Property) associated, by name only, with Sheridan County District Court, Nebraska, Case No. CI 13-16, located as Section 20,
Township 25 North, Range 45 West of the 6th P.M., in Sheridan County, Nebraska,
is land that is not evidenced as a possession or territory, or is ceded, to/of the United States, as the term United States is defined in Nebraska Revised Statutes 77-2701.17 – In this state or within the state means within the exterior limits of the State of Nebraska and includes all the territory within these limits owned by or ceded to the United States of America.

a. If a man acting as an administrator (District Judge) gives permission to, or orders, or attempts to sell, or encumber, the subject land, without authority, upon this noticed, he acts without official immunity.

b. If any man, such as an administrator (District Judge), upon this notice, acts under color of law, individually, or by corporate conspiring, to attempt to order the selling of the subject (Our) land based on a/the Court Order that, as a matter of law, has force and effect only on land that is constitutionally included within the “exclusive legislative authority” of the United States, violates my rights and is personally liable to answer for all damages in a non-United States court, before a jury of free inhabitants (common law) that will judge both the facts and the law of the presented case, independent of any United State Court intervention.

c. The United States governs that which it owns.

d. Free inhabitants people govern that which they own.

e. All land that is “of” the United States is governed by the United States Courts, Administrators, and Legislatures.

f. The Sheridan County District Court in Nebraska, is a United States court, deriving all its authority from the United States Constitution, as its “supreme law” of the land. See- Article VI, paragraph 2, US Constitution.

g. All land, between Canada and Mexico, Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, that is not “of” the United States is governed by those that own/inhabit that same land, utilizing unwritten law (common law), due process, and above all Gods Word.

h. Art. IV, Sec 1, US Constitution- “full faith and credit” to the public acts, records and court proceedings of other states. Free Inhabitant courts, following due process, are included in that “state”.

i. All such inhabitants of the said Americas are duty bound to follow these principles of law, of independence, and of scriptural freedom.

j. No one in America is allowed to make up his own laws that violate these principles. Each man and all created governments are constrained (limited) by written and unwritten law, to respect private property of every type.

k. We have states within a state, jurisdictions within a jurisdiction, each having their defined granted authority.

l. Any man that opposes God’s defined liberty is opposed to God.

m. Upon this courts administrator noticing it’s lack of territorial jurisdiction, by the official record, he must cease all court action until jurisdiction is established on the record, as challenged. SEE Paulsen v. Paulsen, 658 N.W.2d 49, Neb. App. 2003.

n. Also, all entities that are incorporated (created) by a United States written law can only have force and effect of law upon land that is “of” the United States. Full disclosure is paramount.

Some try to impose LEX REX. (“The Law is King”)
Let us impose REX LEX. (“The King (Jesus) is Law”)

3-25-2013 Presented and Signed by ____________________
EDMOND R. JESSE
____________________
KATHLEEN M. JESSE
1838 405th Trl
Ellsworth, NE 69340
all without the United States.

CC: SHERIDAN COUNTY SHERIFF, Sheridan County Sheriff’s Office.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Comments Off on What to do when open carrying a gun. Stop the Cops.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7AoX57slfs    < click and watch.

Stop the Cops from disarming you.

No need for permit.

Terry v. Ohio  –  Officer must have reasonable suspicion of a crime before a stop or detainment.

Prouce v. Delaware  –  Same as above.

Brown v. Texas  –  Officer can not make a stop to acquire identification.

Devery v. US  –  Gun legally carried can not be cause for a stop or detainment.

No Probable Cause

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Comments Off on Motor Vehicle Code applied to “for hire” only.

mu·nic·i·pal·i·ty  (my-ns-pl-t)
n. pl. mu·nic·i·pal·i·ties
1. A political unit, such as a city, town, or village, incorporated for local self-government.
2. A body of officials appointed to manage the affairs of a local political unit.

>>

A judge told me that he could not take judicial notice of a legislative bill because he needed proof it was passed, is not repealed, and is now standing law.  He said I need to get a certified copy from the keeper of legislative bills.

I ordered 4 certified copies of the attached 1905  Nebraska Bill which states that there must be a ‘for hire’ activity before the Motor Vehicle written laws can be applied.

Now it is the obligation for the Prosecutor to produce evidence that it is not standing law.  I personally find no changes.  The no surprise fact is that the codified statutes, which is not law but only evidence of law until rebutted, has removed the ‘for hire’ requirement.  this is nothing short of evil.

1905 Bill

549, Original Bill

>>

Below is how the bill is originally passed.  The next paragraph below is how the code revisionist have taken out the ‘for hire’ element, this done in violation for the bill has not been evidenced as being changed.
5388o Sec. 150 [Municipal ordinances.]  Cities and towns shall have no power to pass, in force or maintain any ordinance, rule or regulation requiring of any owner or operator of a motor vehicle any license or permit to use the public highways or exclude or prohibit any motor vehicle whose owner has complied with section two (2) or section four (4) of this act from the free use of such highways, and all such ordinances, rules or regulations now in force, are hereby declared to be of no validity or effect: provided that nothing in this act shall be construed as limiting the power of local authorities to make and force and maintain an ordinance, rule or regulations, in addition to the provisions of this act, affecting motor vehicles which are offered to the public for hire.  [I.d., § 11.]
Source- Compiled Statutes of NEBRASKA Anotated 1907 and 1909.
1905 is the first time motor vehicle appears in NE law.
Both years, as above, read  exactly like the Legislative Bill of 1905.

>>

5388o Sec. 150 [Municipal ordinances.]  Nothing in this act shall be construed in limiting the power of local authorities to make, enforce and maintain any ordinance, rule or regulation, in addition to the provisions of this act affecting motor vehicles.  [I.d., § 11.]
Source- Compiled Statutes of NEBRASKA Anotated 1911.

Note this revision they left of the “which are offered to the public for hire”, now why did they accidentally do that?

Notice no ‘for hire’ is stated.

>>

Terms Defined:

*libelant – Formerly the party who filed an initiatory action (a formal declaration of a claim), corresponding to the plaintiff in actions at law.

*libelee – one against whom a libel has been filed in a court, corresponding to the defendant in actions at law.

*averment, noun – 1. an affirmation or allegation, 2. a formal statement by a party in a case of a fact, or circumstance, that the party declares as true, or a challenge for contrary evidence.

*POSITIVE-AVERMENTs – facts declared as being true.

*NEGATIVE-AVERMENTs – beliefs that are declared as being false.

*American , state-national – a man, with birth right on Nebraska soil, as a man who has not elected to become a United States citizen, as a man who is not a resident of United States, and as a man who does not resides on United States land, as a man who has never contracted with the United States.

*travel – use of the open way (road), as non-commercial, not for profit.

*American National, noun – as one man, of many men, of birth right ties, to the land that consists of land between Canada’s South Border, Mexico’s Norther Border, the Atlantic ocean and the Pacific Ocean.

Additional INFO, to aid in ‘as a matter of law determinations‘:

Breakdown of US “Motor Vehicle” as defined:


5388o Sec. 150 [Municipal ordinances.]  Cities and towns shall have no power to pass, in force or maintain any ordinance, rule or regulation requiring of any owner or operator of a motor vehicle any license or permit to use the public highways or exclude or prohibit any motor vehicle whose owner has complied with section two (2) or section four (4) of this act from the free use of such highways, and all such ordinances, rules or regulations now in force, are hereby declared to be of no validity or effect: provided that nothing in this act shall be construed as limiting the power of local authorities to make and force and maintain an ordinance, rule or regulations, in addition to the provisions of this act, affecting motor vehicles which are offered to the public for hire.  [I.d., § 11.]
Source- Compiled Statutes of NEBRASKA Anotated 1907 and 1909.
1905 is the first time motor vehicle appears in NE law, as House Roll 146, Mr Hand Legislative Bill of 1905.

>>

View/Search the bill > https://books.google.com/books?id=EJJGAQAAIAAJ&pg=RA1-PA1404&lpg=RA1-PA1404&dq=5388o+Sec.+150+Nebraska+%5BMunicipal+ordinances.%5D&source=bl&ots=A5zU-4U2kK&sig=ACfU3U3q1ryyeK0e5NgJq7c2sV1lhoBDGg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwix3_vrw4zgAhUKlKwKHWnJBhIQ6AEwAHoECAoQAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false

>>>

18 U.S. Code § 31 – Definitions

(a)Definitions.—In this chapter, the following definitions apply:

(6)Motor vehicle.—

The term “motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo.

(10)Used for commercial purposes.—

The term “used for commercial purposes” means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit.

>>

 Title 1 of the United States Code is General Provisions. Section 2 of that title defines county: “The word county” includes a parish, or any other equivalent subdivision of a State or Territory of the United States.”

>>

U.S. Code › Title 1 › Chapter 1 › § 2

The word “county” includes a parish, or any other equivalent subdivision of a State or Territory of the United States.

(July 30, 1947, ch. 388, 61 Stat. 633.)

>>

Supremacy Clause

United States Constitution – Article IV, clause 2, – “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof … shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”

>>

United States Constitution – Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17, The limitations of the United States, which is the same limitations as the STATE OF NEBRASKA legislature.

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of Particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings…”

>>

The Articles of Confederation – Article I. The Style of this confederacy shall be “The United States of America.”

>>

Nebraska Revised Statute 60-123.

  1. Motor vehicle, defined.

Motor vehicle means any vehicle propelled by any power other than muscular power. Motor vehicle does not include (1) mopeds, (2) farm tractors, (3) self-propelled equipment designed and used exclusively to carry and apply fertilizer, chemicals, or related products to agricultural soil and crops, agricultural floater-spreader implements, and other implements of husbandry designed for and used primarily for tilling the soil and harvesting crops or feeding livestock, (4) power unit hay grinders or a combination which includes a power unit and a hay grinder when operated without cargo, (5) vehicles which run only on rails or tracks, (6) off-road designed vehicles not authorized by law for use on a highway, including, but not limited to, golf car vehicles, go-carts, riding lawnmowers, garden tractors, all-terrain vehicles, utility-type vehicles, snowmobiles registered or exempt from registration under sections 60-3,207 to 60-3,219, and minibikes, (7) road and general-purpose construction and maintenance machinery not designed or used primarily for the transportation of persons or property, including, but not limited to, ditchdigging apparatus, asphalt spreaders, bucket loaders, leveling graders, earthmoving carryalls, power shovels, earthmoving equipment, and crawler tractors, (8) self-propelled chairs used by persons who are disabled, (9) electric personal assistive mobility devices, and (10) bicycles as defined in section 60-611.

>>

Nebraska Revised Statute 60-355. Transporter, defined.

Transporter means any person lawfully engaged in the business of transporting motor vehicles or trailers not his or her own *solely for delivery thereof (1) by driving singly, (2) by driving in combinations by the towbar, fullmount, or saddlemount method or any combination thereof, or (3) when a truck or truck-tractor tows a trailer.

>>

(The bold and underline is added by Defendant Hansen for location ease only.)

(Not when one elects to register a automobile into the ‘Department of Motor Vehicles’, he no longer is *sole owner.)

Sole – This may become exceedingly important due to if they have a standing ‘state compelling‘ interest in the property (automobile) they have right to govern it as to ‘registration’, licensed operator, liability insurance, etc.  But this share in ownership must be consensual, contractual, and without full disclosure such is a void contract.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

You Can Carry a Concealed Gun in “Omaha”.

Posted: 10th February 2013 by admin in Uncategorized
Comments Off on You Can Carry a Concealed Gun in “Omaha”.

You Can Carry a Concealed Gun in “Omaha” !!!!!!!!

Hansen – Officer I just delivered a shipment of gold to one of my clients, now I am on my way home.
Officer – What is the name of this client?
Hansen – Client 28r7.
Officer – Where was the delivery?
Hansen – Latitude 2576 Longitude 3455.
Officer – That does not make sense?
Hansen – They are in-house parameters, top secret, need to know basis only.
Officer – Why are you carrying a gun strapped to your ankle?
Hansen – “”Own defense“”.
Officer – So you have no gold with you now?
Hansen – Correct, just the money.
Officer – Show me the money.
Hansen – I am not allowed to do that without a order from a court possessing territorial jurisdiction.  Do you have such a court order on your person?  Also are we standing on land that your employer has a proprietary interest in pursuant to Article 1, Sec 8, Clause 17, of the ‘Constitution for the United States of America’?  One more thing where can I get a certified copy of a map of the City of Omaha?  (It does not exist.)
Officer – Ah, Ah, I’ll let you go if you go straight home with the gun dismantled and placed in the trunk of your car.
Hansen – I demand that you follow me home then and be my “”own defense”‘, being the criminals know I carry gold and lots of money.
Officer – Have a safe day.

City of Omaha Ordinance:
Sec. 20-192. – Carrying concealed weapon.
It shall be unlawful for any person except an authorized law enforcement officer purposely or knowingly to carry a weapon concealed on or about his person.
(exception)
Sec. 20-194. – Protection as defense.
It shall be a sufficient defense for any person charged under this article to show that he was engaged in a “”lawful business“”, calling or employment and the circumstances in which he was placed at the time were such as to justify a prudent person carrying a weapon for his “”own defense“” or the defense of his family or property.

>>>

All the below written laws are for land “only” within the exterior boundaries of the territory called “Nebraska” that is land being a territory or possession of the United States (owned by the USA).

Concealed Carry

Nebraska is a shall-issue state, meaning that qualified applicants must be issued a concealed carry permit.

Requirements for a concealed carry permit in Nebraska are:

1. state-certified handgun safety course within the past three years,

2. resident of the state,  (resident is associated with living in land owned by ‘The United States of America’ in Nebraska.)

3. successful background check

4. at least 21 years of age

5. not a felon.

Castle Doctrine – Nebraska does not have a castle doctrine law. With the exception of inside one’s own home, state law requires a duty to retreat before citizens can protect themselves against violence. Reasonable retreat is not required inside the home. (One cop told me to drag anyone you shoot inside your house before calling the cops.)

Pro-Gun Provisions – Open carry is not restricted in Nebraska under most circumstances.

In automobiles, loaded rifles and handguns can be loaded but must be kept in plain sight (shotguns, on the other hand, must be unloaded). The state is a “shall-issue” state for law-abiding residents age 21 or over who wish to obtain a permit to carry concealed weapons.

Restrictions

License or permit required to purchase guns: A permit is required to purchase handguns in the “STATE” of Nebraska. So best just purchase them in Nebraska in land that is not owned by ‘The United States of America’. Application for a permit is made to the sheriff or police chief in the purchaser’s hometown.

Places in Nebraska where carrying is prohibited, with or without a permit:

  • Law enforcement facilities
  • Detention facilities
  • Courtrooms
  • Election polling places
  • Government meeting places
  • Financial institutions
  • Professional and collegiate athletic events
  • Schools and colleges
  • Churches
  • Emergency rooms
  • Political rallies and fundraisers
  • Establishments that sell alcohol for on-premises consumption
  • Private establishments — including places of employment — that disallow guns.
  • ((I personally believe that after studying territorial jurisdiction, for 20 plus years, all the above only apply in land that is a ‘possession or territory of the United States’, that is in Nebraska.
  • https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/federal-land-by-state

NOTE – The above list is applicable to events done on non-USA owned land only as a respect for the proprietors preference and has no relationship to State of Nebraska written law unless the land is owned by the USA.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.