Hansen Arrested 5th time, Harassed, this time for a believed gun.

Posted: 4th September 2014 by admin in Arrest False, Probable Cause
Comments Off on Hansen Arrested 5th time, Harassed, this time for a believed gun.

FROM: Paul John Hansen,

c/o 1548 N 19 Street,

Omaha, Nebraska,

without the United States.

TO: City of Omaha Police Officer – Badge Number 1106.

City of Omaha Police Department,

Southwest Precinct

9864 ‘M’ Street

Omaha, NE 68127

 

NOTICE – City of Omaha Police Officer Badge Number 1106 is instructed to review the attached Affidavit, dated ___/___2014, and make corrections to any portion that is not correct as pertaining to the event, and mail those corrections back to Hansen as addressed above, ideally in affidavit form, being very specific as to any corrections that you wish to include, if no corrections are made the document will be used in its entirety as evidence in a Constitution of the United States Article 3 (common law) Federal Court.

You have ten days from the day you receive this document to make corrections that you believe are appropriate, making it due to be mailed to me on ___/___ 2014.

If you need 10 additional more days email me at pauljjhansen@hotmail.com to give notice of the need.

For a copy of this document in WORD format go to: https://freeinhabitant.info/probable-cause/hansen-arrested-5th-time-harassed-this-time-for-a-believed-gun.htm

_______________________

Paul John Hansen

___ This Request, and Affidavit, were mailed by Notary Presentment on the date of __/__ 2014, affidavit preserved in Hansen’s custody.

1.5 hour assembly, with notarizing time, mailing fee _______.

 

Chronology, Arrest without Cause, in Affidavit Form, Car Show.

1. That Paul John Hansen, a man, being of 21 years of age or older, hereafter as Affiant.

2. That on September third (3rd), 2014 at approximately 8:00 pm Affiant was walking through a Car Show in the parking lot east of Flashbacks at an address of 3015 S 83rd Plz, Omaha, NE 68124.

3. That 3015 S 83rd Plz, Omaha, NE 68124, Flashbacks parking lot is not evidenced as a possession or territory of the United States, or evidenced as land owned by the CITY OF OMAHA.

4. That Affiant noticed a CITY OF OMAHA police officer, identified as “Officer 1106 Badge Number”, hereafter as “Arresting Officer”, intensely watching Affiant as he talked on his cell phone.

5. That after five minutes Affiant got very uncomfortable with Arresting Officer’s harassment and started to leave by jogging away.

6. That Arresting Officer ran after Affiant and caught up with Affiant after Affiant ran about 300 yards, and the Arresting Officer running about 600 yards.

7. That Arresting Officer caught up with Affiant and abruptly asked why are you running.

8. That Affiant responded; “exercise’, adding “is there a law against exercising/running”.

Arresting Officer asked Affiant if Affiant knew that Affiant had a warrant for Affiants arrest.

9. That Affiant replied; I know of no warrant, though the courts often put out warrants lacking law for my arrest, and that I have been arrested in this area 5 times, all with false warrants and I do not like being harassed by the Police.

10. That Arresting Officer said I was under arrest so he could have a police cruiser come and get me and he was checking on the warrant.

11. That two Omaha Police cruisers surrounded me and a total of three Omaha Police Officers surrounded me as the public watched.

12. That Arresting Officer arresting Officer said that Officer Hansen, who he was filling in for as he policed the Show, informed him that he should watch for me at the Car Show to exercise the warrant.

13. That Arresting Officer ran a warrant search and then said; “Your in luck there is no warrant”.

14. That the Arresting Officer held me under arrest for no less than 30 minutes.

15. That the Arresting Officer said that we know you carry a gun.

16. That Arresting Officer said that he read the letter Affiant sent to the Police about carrying a gun.

17. That Affiant told the Officer to go back and read the letter and he will see that the Police Chief and Douglas County Sherriff were instructed to notify me, by mailing, if I did not have a right to carry a gun if I stayed off State of Nebraska government land, and off CITY OF OMAHA owned land, and that I was to be provided with a map, or an internet site, of a map of what is legally the CITY OF OMAHA and the State of Nebraska owned land, and that I have not gotten any letter back from the City Police or the Sheriff of Douglas County.

18. That Affiant told the Arresting Officer that it is Affiant’s belief that Affiant has a right to carry a gun providing he stays off the City of Omaha and State of Nebraska owned land.

Arresting Officer said that they were going to search me to see if I have a gun on me.

19. That Affiant responded by saying that I do not give any consent for any search.

20. That Arresting Officer said it is not a search but a patdown.

21. That Affiant responded by saying that I do not give any consent for any patdown, or for anyone to search me, or touch me.

22. That Arresting Officer’s aiding officers then grabbed me, pulled my hands behind my back and clamped my fingers together with their tight grip and searched my entire body. Not finding anything and then let me go.

23. That before leaving Affiant asked the Arresting Officer for his business card, he said he never caries one, then Affiant asked for his badge number, Arresting Officer replied 1106.

24. That Arresting Officer had no evidenced, when asked by Affiant, that the location of this arrest was done on land that is owned by the CITY OF OMAHA, STATE OF NEBRASKA, or owned by “The United States of America”.

24. Affiant had the entire event recorded.

That this affidavit being executed without the United States,…………………………

((( Guess what, any “order”, by a government agent, to come to a “rest” is an “arrest”, all arrest are seizures, all seizures must be for cause, by oath or affirmation (4th Amendment) as proof of probable cause, if they have no valid cause I’ll ask the jury for damages. Generally $10,000.

All acts done by government employees (Police) without law (probable cause) do so under their own liability. )))

 

God given RIGHT v. State RIGHT to carry a gun on non-US/State land.

Posted: 2nd September 2014 by admin in Gun Carry Rights
1

Demanding a US or STATE constitutional right is self defeating, never claim residency.

Your big fat mouth can and will be used against you.

DISINFORMATION, INDOCTRINATION, YOUR choice of WORDS, nullify your birth rights.

“US citizens” are people presumed to be acting on USA owned land.

“STATE citizens” are people presumed to be acting on USA owned land.

US or State resident is a person presumed to be residing on US/State governed land.

The police claim of “in the state” is legally defined as US owned land.

Resident defined in the US written law is – “alien resident”.

Aliens (residents) have no birth right to bear arms anywhere the US claims jurisdiction.

Demanding US or State constitutional rights are not God given birth rights.

So if ever found with a gun never:

a. claim US or State citizenship,

b. residency in any state of the US,

c. present a State Drivers License (for that is state citizenship evidence),

d. claim use of a SS number (only a US citizen is allowed to use a SS number)

e. US or State birth certificate, essentially say nothing except I choose to keep the burden of proof on you that I do not have a right to cary this gun at this location. I chose not to provide any info that can be used against me in a criminal court of law.

>>

The constitutional right to keep and bear arms is subject to reasonable regulation by statute if the statute does not frustrate the guarantee of the constitutional provision. State v. Comeau, 233 Neb. 907, 448 N.W.2d 595 (1989).

You see reasonable regulation is far different from God given rights. Stay off State owned land and the State can not “reasonable regulate” you down to a slingshot.

Pay for counsel time if you need more information.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System. Counsel time and a vast array of briefs, motions, case law, legal challenges, etc.

Private Property v. Real Estate, one taxable, one independent of taxation (governance).

Posted: 19th August 2014 by admin in Allodia, Private, Private Property, Tax / Property
Comments Off on Private Property v. Real Estate, one taxable, one independent of taxation (governance).

To receive the ONE HOUR MP3 audio presentation pay $2.5 HERE and then email me and ask for M1S-36.

((( Caution the enabling act of your state must be understood in interpreting challenges of taxation based on  Art 1, Sec 8, Par 17 of the Constitution of the United States. Paul Hansen )))

Private Property v. Real Estate, one taxable, one independent of taxation (governance).

Speaker- TX man Jeff Ganapowski.

((( This is an enjoyable eye opening view, with attorney input, packed with INFO, of how one can separate your property from the state real estate tax roles in every state. Paul Hansen )))

Below is notes that touch as to the many topics Jeff covers:

“Real Estate” is of an Estate, “estate” is defined as “property interest”, interest is partial. not whole, absolute, ownership.

Deed is conveyed property of reality; reality is of “estate”, thus not private property.

Allodia is owned in absolute, true private property.

Allodium is associated with estate, interest, not owned in absolute.

Eminent domain always presumes to take Allodium, estate land.

States tax “real property”, not “private property”.

How do you own property absolutely?

Black’s 6:

Page 1217 Private Property

Land and Houses

5th Amendment Private Property

(Does not address real estate,

page 1263 Real estate = real property,

page 1218 real property –

page 547 Estate = is an interest. (less than title)

Unalienable right only to sovereign American by birthright.

Fee simple – estate,

Recorded, as real estate is a presumption, consenting to a recording of a type.

Taxing estate property

Allodium – estate

Allodial – title, full, absolute, ownership

How do you lose right to own.

File a deed.

414 Deed is conveyance of reality property for real estate. Evidence as Interest only.

1106 absolute or qualified. (zoning, etc.)

American government only Secures Rights and Govern by consent.

Article 8 TX constitutions, all real property – real estate, estate.

Government can only touch private property by consent.

Right to be there v. privilege.

No SS

Sovereign, own the land.

Art 4, Republic Form Government, people hold sovereignty.

Not a voter to represent.

Sovereign v. Subject

Private Property, to trespass.   Property of the State.

Carry concealed weapon on private property.

Attorney claims all land in TX from King, Spanish Grants, have to source your title back to the State.

Are you ruling that I owe it in Federal Reserve Notes, for I can not get the dollar defined in US written law, congressional coinage act of 176?.

Tire tread, misquoting the law. School bus left out of the codified statute, yet evidenced in the legislative bill.

Private property found in common law.

Purchased with lawful money, with bill of sale.

Separate from US SS system.

Due Notice, anyone with a claim 30 days, newspaper affidavit of no replies.

Prior owner notified government that they are no longer the owner so do not send them a tax bill.

Allodia –

No law recording of a “deed”.

Force the tax foreclosing party to provide the facts that they rely upon as the land not being private property.

Make claim for value in property associate with property tax.

Judge said proving ownership of automobile, 30 Notice in Local newspaper.

Notice for 30 days owner of automobile.

IRS said ss number makes you liable.

Active ss number, active bank account.

Revoke ss number.

Arrested me in 1996, dropped case when no SS number filed.

AOC the term US is Congress, Congress created US constitution for them selves.

He claims as being an inhabitant.

Can a non-resident get a state drivers license, non-residents have a right to travel.

Official Code of Georgia Annotated is the code legislatively sanctioned by O.C.G.A. § 1-1-1

O.C.G.A. § 40-2-1, subsection 32, – non-resident is afforded the privilege to drive.

All state law says that upon the adoption of the US constitution common law courts are abolished. For all relationship with the US is by contract, by consent. Most importantly one must stay off their land.

>>> Repetitive not yet sorted below:

Private Property v. Real Estate, one taxable, one independent of taxation (governance).

“Real state” is of an Estate, “estate” is defined as “property interest”, interest is partial. not whole, absolute, ownership.

Deed is conveyed property of reality; reality is of “estate”, thus not private property.

Allodia is owned in absolute, true private property.

Allodium is associated with estate, interest, not owned in absolute.

Eminent domain always presumes to take Allodium, estate land.

States tax “real property”, not “private property”.

How to own property absolutely by court order.

How to own a car privately by court order. Make claim by 30 legal notice in newspaper.

How one that has an active SS number has an obligation to pay US taxes.

I highly recommend this presentation; I’ll soon get it into Audio only for ease of access.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System. Counsel time and a vast array of briefs, motions, case law, legal challenges, etc.

National & Citizens, both are equally bad if you try claiming independence from the US.

Posted: 16th August 2014 by admin in Citizen vs. Free Inhabitant, Nationals, Native
Comments Off on National & Citizens, both are equally bad if you try claiming independence from the US.

8 U.S.C. § 1401 : US Code – Section 1401: Nationals and citizens of United States at birth – 

The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth: (a) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof; (b) a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe: Provided, That the granting of citizenship under this subsection shall not in any manner impair or otherwise affect the right of such person to tribal or other property; (c) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States and one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions, prior to the birth of such person; (d) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year prior to the birth of such person, and the other of whom is a national, but not a citizen of the United States; (e) a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person; (f) a person of unknown parentage found in the United States while under the age of five years, until shown, prior to his attaining the age of twenty-one years, not to have been born in the United States; (g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States, or periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization as that term is defined in section 288 of title 22 by such citizen parent, or any periods during which such citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person (A) honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States, or (B) employed by the United States Government or an international organization as defined in section 288 of title 22, may be included in order to satisfy the physical- presence requirement of this paragraph. This proviso shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date; and (h) a person born before noon (Eastern Standard Time) May 24, 1934, outside the limits and jurisdiction of the United States of an alien father and a mother who is a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, had resided in the United States. – See more at: http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/8/12/III/I/1401#sthash.OiTrz7BL.dpuf

“US citizen” upon leaving the District of Columbia becomes involved in “interstate commerce,” as a “resident” does not have the common-law right to travel, of a Citizen of one of the several states.” Hendrick v. Maryland S.C. Reporter’s Rd. 610-625.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System. Counsel time and a vast array of briefs, motions, case law, legal challenges, etc.

Protected: Man gets released from SS number by religious conviction, opens bank account with no SS number. M1Sp-35 (5$)

Posted: 5th August 2014 by admin in Banking, Banking without SSN, Social Security Number
Comments Off on Protected: Man gets released from SS number by religious conviction, opens bank account with no SS number. M1Sp-35 (5$)

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

A Stop is an Arrest, right to travel.

Posted: 3rd August 2014 by admin in 4th Amendment, Arrest, Police Stop, Travel Rights
Comments Off on A Stop is an Arrest, right to travel.

The attached law review shows how a police stop of an automobile is an arrest and can only be maintained as lawful if it has fact evidence of probable cause before the stop.

StanfordLawReview-NonArrestAutomobileStops

4th Amendment – probable cause.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

ABOUT ME, PAUL JOHN HANSEN

Posted: 17th July 2014 by admin in ABOUT ME, Paul John Hansen
Comments Off on ABOUT ME, PAUL JOHN HANSEN

Paul John Hansen, see also pauljjhansen.com –

Foremost I love the Lord, His written Word, and the Family of God. My income is primarily derived from rental properties, selling law related briefs and information, and counseling people across the country in living independent of the corporation called the US INC. I am technically a lawyer, counsel, and not a BAR associat attorney. I understand that the elect of God should promote the Kingdom of God (and His dominion) on earth as it is in Heaven. I am a serious student of Biblical law, and constitutional limitations of the US Government. I have been in court over 350 times. Arrest, oh I lost count. I have received numerous death threats that have come from US STATE agents and officers. Always bogus misdemeanor charges. (Mostly Municipal Housing Codes, right to travel actions, or related acts.)  I file no Federal Income Taxes (1040 Form) since the year 2000. (No filings in any form.)(Always demand a 6203 Assessment when confronted.)  I do not pay STATE income tax, or sales tax on major purchases. I pay no COUNTY property taxes though I owned over 28 properties (28 buildings). ( I believe I have discovered a “filing for record” process that takes my Land off the tax roles. ) I do not vote for UNITED STATE, or NEBRASKA STATE, County, or City governing officers. I am a sovereign American by birth right. (Not a US citizen.) I believe in full support of the “perpetual Union” as found in the second of four constitutions, “Articles of Confederation”.  I have discovered that a “free American” has the lawful standing to choose to live independent of the corporate US governments, and its legislative statutory courts in the vast majority of his daily life, and to be forced to do otherwise is slavery.

Email – pauljjhansen@hotmail.com

Paul John Hansen, 1548 N 19th St., Omaha, Nebraska 68110, without the United States, mailing location only, not a resident address.

See my other site also – pauljjhansen.com

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Not Registering Is Evidence Of Vehicle ‘Not’ Registered, County Treasurer.

Posted: 16th July 2014 by admin in DMV, Registration, Registration / Self / Vehicle, Registration Property, Travel Rights
Comments Off on Not Registering Is Evidence Of Vehicle ‘Not’ Registered, County Treasurer.

This is an email conversation with Douglas County Treasurer, Nebraska, where cars are registered in the county.

>>

Paul Hansen 1:38 PM (7-14-2014)
I sold a car to someone and they are driving it for now over a year without registering it in their name.

They claim they have no need to register because they are ‘not for hire’.

I need a form from you or the DMV, or instructions, that I can use to file a document that states that the vehicle has been sold so that no liability remains upon me.

>>

Treasurer DC 3:17 PM (7-15-2014)
Paul,

We don’t have anything like that.  Do you have a copy of the bill of sale or their name and address?  That will suffice.  If anyone would inquire as to ownership of the vehicle, our records would indicate that it was no longer registered to anyone.

Tim Cavanaugh

Chief Deputy

Douglas County Treasurer

402-444-3250

>>

Paul Hansen 3:40 PM (7-15-2014)
Are you saying that I need to bring the/a ‘Bill of Sale” down to your office and have it recorded or something like that? I’ll have to recreate the original by hand, it will only have my signature on it, will that work, he has the title stuff.  

>>

Treasurer DC
10:15 AM (7-16-2014)

Paul

No. If you do have one, just keep your bill of sale with your personal records. That’s all you have to do or can do.

From: Paul Hansen [mailto:pauljjjjhansen@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 3:41 PM
To: Treasurer DC
Subject: Re: Request for Form

>>

Paul Hansen <pauljjjjhansen@gmail.com>
11:39 AM (2 hours ago)
to Treasurer
One more question, how is your office or the DMV noticed that

“our records would indicate that it was no longer registered to anyone”
 
what act, or document, before these offices, gives notice of the sale, and of the “no longer registered” 
 
status?
 
If he, the buyer, never does anything with the signed over title, and I have no form to notice your offices of the vehicle ownership being passed for your offices to record, how can the status of registered be changed to ‘no longer registered’ in the DMV records if the man is stopped by a state patrol?
Thanks much for you replies. Paul

>>

Treasurer DC
1:55 PM (8 minutes ago)
to me

The vehicle has an expired registration and no plates.  If we run the VIN, it shows it as not registered.  You would be listed as the last registered owner.   If he never titles it, that’s how it stands.  If the person who owns it now gets stopped, he better have proof of ownership.  If he has the title, you should have signed off on the title as transferring ownership.  If you did not sign the title over to him, you are still the owner.

From: Paul Hansen [mailto:pauljjjjhansen@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 11:39 AM

>>> END OF EMAILING>>>

Paul Hansen’s Comment:

So if a vehicle is sold to you, and you have *evidence of the sale, and/or purchase, that is evidence that it is no longer registered (contracted, franchised, legal nexus) with the state, county. So there is no dis-registration, all you need is that the registration of the former registrant is no longer active because he sold all interest in the vehicle, thus canceling any nexus, DMV association, ‘motor vehicle’ registration,  with the state.

*evidence- bill of sale, certified copy of bill of sale so original does not get lost, signed over title, certified copy of title so original does not get lost, caution do not carry a signed over title with the vehicle, a person could steal the car and sell it with the original title in hand, I also place the documents on a internet site in pdf form (picture) so you could always direct the officer to the site as well.

Therefore if a person does not use the ‘automobile’ in a ‘for hire’ use there is no need for registration, license, proof of liability coverage, or a state driver license. I put Kingdom Plates and NOT FOR HIRE plates on as notice and do not get pulled over for DMV violations.

>>>>

Below is a email conversation with the Nebraska DMV on the same subject.

DMV DVR Web dmv.dvrweb@nebraska.gov via hotmail.com

7-31-14

to pauljjhansen

Good afternoon, Paul:

Unfortunately, there is nothing we can do to remove your name as the most recent titled owner of the vehicle. Did you keep copies of the Bill of Sale and the assigned Certificate of Title? If so, this will serve as proof that ownership of the vehicle was transferred.

If you feel the current owner is operating the vehicle without proper titling and registration I would encourage you to contact your local law enforcement agency.

If you have any additional questions or need further verification on this matter please contact a member of our Help Desk Staff. The Help Desk Staff is available M-F 7:30 AM to 6:00 PM CDT and may be reached at 402-471-3918.

Thank you,

Jackie Boldan, Staff Assistant II

Nebraska Department of Motor Vehicles

>>>

Email from: paul john hansen

From: pauljjhansen@hotmail.com

7-28-14

Comments:

TO: Nebraska DMV

I sold a car six months ago and the buyer is still driving it with no state plates, he has some “NOT FOR HIRE” plate on it.

I asked him if it has been registered into his name and out of mine, he said no, he said he does not want to contract with the state by registration.

What can I send the Nebraska DMV to get clear of the liability of the vehicle.

I know sooner or latter that he will get parking tickets and the VIN number will end up being used to send me tickets.

Does the Nebraska DMV have a form that I can send in to give notice of sale.

Please advise.

PH 7-30-14

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Hansen spends 20 days in jail, again, then they dismiss the original charge, Why? 

Posted: 3rd July 2014 by admin in Motor Vehicle, Travel Rights, Verified Complaint
Comments Off on Hansen spends 20 days in jail, again, then they dismiss the original charge, Why? 

(WORD only?A) In 2009 I bumped a City Of Omaha Transit Bus at 2 miles per hour, due to sheet of ice. I (insurance) paid the 145$ damage immediately. Office shows up and gave me a traffic citation for ‘to fast for the conditions, I signed the ticket and cancelled the ticket signature the next day by mailing with the following affirmative defenses. I told the officer there is no evidence that I was carrying cargo or passengers for a fee. I gave no document except insurance card. The vehicle was purchased by me years before, not registered, and not plated. Officer only took my name, DOB, and mailing address, the rest of the info such as a ‘returned to the state‘ (cancelled) state license was found by him in old DMV records. Five (5) years latter (2014) they issue a warrant for me for failure to appear, I was arrested at a country dance club, judge got nervous when I demanded the 4th Amendment requirement, and she let me out on (ROR) return own recognizance (no bond), I fail to appear again, another warrant issued, they arrest me again by a sudo-swat team, full tactical dress, at the same dance club, asserted by no less than six cruisers and 8 officers. They hold me in county jail for 20 days, each time I was in front of the judge I gave notice that no verified sworn complaint is evidenced in the record upon which the prosecutor could act upon and which is necessary to create sufficient pleadings to invoke the courts general jurisdiction. Court then dismisses one ‘failure to appear’ and the original ‘infraction’. I said I have been kidnaped adding ‘no contest’ contingent on if a verified complaint, compliant to the 4th amendment, is evidenced in the record. I was released immediately.   7-1-2014. This is the 3rd time I have done this and was released each time; my friends have done it 14 times. Order the M1S-15 Case Judgment ‘Vacated for lack of “verified” complaint in the record’.  (35$) click the HERE below. False arrest is 10K$, 3K$ each day thereafter for false incarceration, So I’ll go after 80K$ for damages. Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Hansen Interviewed, 2 hours, they said it was the most interesting interview they had up to that point.

Posted: 24th May 2014 by admin in Interview
Comments Off on Hansen Interviewed, 2 hours, they said it was the most interesting interview they had up to that point.

2 hour Audio – California Radio Station interview of Lawyer, Paul John Hansen.

Contract with the United States gives them force of law, jurisdiction

Wide mix of topics.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

 

 

Older Entries
Newer Entries