NOTICE – Automobile towed without authorization.

Posted: 17th May 2016 by admin in Property Rights Car
Comments Off on NOTICE – Automobile towed without authorization.

To:
CITY OF OMAHA IMPOUND FACILITIES CORPORATION,
Registered Agent and Office Address
Paul D. Kratz
SUITE 804
1819 FARNAM STREET
OMAHA, NE 68183

To:
Todd Schmaderer, a man,
505 S 15
OMAHA, NE 68102
Emailed > http://opd.ci.omaha.ne.us/contact-us

To:
Omaha Police Department
7809 F Street
Omaha, NE 68127
Telephone: (402) 444-5782
Fax: (402) 444-4988

From:
Paul John Hansen, a man
2715 S 44 St.
Omaha, Nebraska [68110],
without the United States.
402-957-2853
pauljjhansen@hotmail.com

Re: Automobile towed without authorization:

On or about the dates between October 23, 2014 and October 31, 2014 my car was towed from the drive way of my house with a mailing location of 1548 N 19th Street (or 1548 Florence Boulevard).
There is no evidence that the said location of the parked car was on land owned by the CITY OF OMAHA, DOUGLAS COUNTY, STATE OF NEBRASKA, or the UNITED STATES.
There is no evidence that the towed car was owned by CITY OF OMAHA, DOUGLAS COUNTY, STATE OF NEBRASKA, or the UNITED STATES.
There is no evidence that the towed car was registered, or included in any contract, with the CITY OF OMAHA, DOUGLAS COUNTY, STATE OF NEBRASKA, or the UNITED STATES.
There is no evidence that I, the signed, as owner, gave permission to any person to tow the subject car.
There is no evidence that a court order,warrant,or judgment, exists that gives instruction to tow the subject car.
There is no evidence that the territorial jurisdiction is not of a common law court of record (community convened court,non-state legislative court.) Said court shall determine the law, facts, and damages, and the judgment is independent of the United States Courts.
The 7th Amendment states: ‘In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall
exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury,
shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of
the common law.’
There is no evidence that the value of the car is less than “twenty dollars” as a dollar was defined in the year of 1791.
There is no evidence that no other man owned the subject car other than Paul John Hansen,the signed.
The owner of the subject car was clearly made know by the “Notice” on the plate, and by the documents laying on the dash of the car when towed, directing all to see “owner of record”:
https://freeinhabitant.info/private/self-registration-public-record-of-my-scooter.htm
004. Year- 1995, Make Ford, Model Taurus GL/SE, Color- White, Chassis Number 1FALP52U4SG241419.  Previous Owner- JEFF WALLICK / BARBARA A WALLICK, RR2 BOX 280, OSMOND, NE 68765. NOTICE – Collateral lien for three and one-half troy ounce of gold,  number 1-17-14-714-8940-a. Owner is a man called Paul John Hansen 1548 N 19, Omaha, Nebraska an address without the United States, being not a resident of the United States, of ecclesiastical jurisdiction. For use not associated with hauling cargo or persons ‘for hire’, not owned by the United States or any state thereof. pauljjhansen@hotmail.com, 402-957-2853.

The plate on the car at the time of the tow was, in one inch letter, as follows:
–Private Household Good,
–Non-Commercial Use,
–Not For Hire.
402-957-2853 Paul John Hansen

The value of the car was equivalent to 1.666 ounces of gold (@1200$/oz) ($2000.00) at the time of the tow.
The value of the use of the car was .0083 ounces (10$) of gold per day.
The total damages caused by the man called Todd Schmadereris as follows:
a. Car value – 1.666 ounces of gold. > -$2,000.00
b. Loss of use value based on the above times 567 days (Oct 31, 2014 to May 20, 2016). -$5,670.00
-$7,670.00
NOTICE: THIS IS AN OFFICIAL COUNTER-FORFEITURE CLAIM FOR
DAMAGES AGAINST THE ABOVE NAMED WRONGDOERS AND
/ OR OBLIGATED PARTIES, AS WELL AS A NOTICE OF INTENT
TO LIEN, AND IS INTENDED TO MEET ALL NOTICE REQUIREMENTS FOR
ADDITIONAL LAWFUL ACTION AGAINST THEM SHOULD FURTHER
PURSUIT BECOME NECESSARY.

My claim herein is against the man called Todd Schmaderer.

The, subject car, automobile, was a:
Year -1995
Color -White
Model -Ford
Type -Taurus
Chassis Number – 1FALP52U4SG241419

I need the following from Todd Schmaderer for my claim:
Tow records of the incident.
Mans name that allegedly ticketed the car for tow.
Mans name that ordered the taking of my car.
Copy of any citation associated?
What day was it towed?
Who towed the car?
What happened to the car?
Where is my property (car) now?
Who is responsible for keeping records of all cars towed for the CITY OF OMAHA.
Communication from Todd Schmaderer within three (3) days that he will answer this claim within thirty (30) days from the date he received it.
This document was emailed to> http://opd.ci.omaha.ne.us/contact-us for service upon Todd Schmaderer. (Sending Computer Screen Shot retained.)

5-17-2016 _Paul John Hansen_________________,
Paul John Hansen

cc: Retained by two mailing witnesses #4563, and #6844,mailing letter and content video recorded mailing,and emailing ‘Screen Shot’. [Dropbox file – “Taurus Tow 2014”.]

Common law ‘court of record’ defined – Due Process by a Court of Right, No US Judge, only referee, 12 Jurors (no US citizens), no representative licensed attorney participation, only counsel. Wrongdoer must appear, or suffer default judgment, 🙂 me, 🙁 you.

Emailed 10:00 am 5/17/2016 to Todd Schmaderer Office.

[[ 6-13-2015, 26 days later – Todd Schmaderer did acknowledge that he got my email but he has presently refused to give any answer to any question asked in this letter. I will start may common law court action for damages in a week if he does not respond to determine a fair settlement.]]

>>>>

Automobile Tow Issue

Protected: IRS W9 is for “Taxpayer”, w8 is for “non-Taxpayer”, how to use it properly when banking with no SS number.

Posted: 18th April 2016 by admin in Banking, Social Security Number, w8 w9
Comments Off on Protected: IRS W9 is for “Taxpayer”, w8 is for “non-Taxpayer”, how to use it properly when banking with no SS number.

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Are you eager to say you are “in” the United States REpublic?

Posted: 16th April 2016 by admin in Republic
Comments Off on Are you eager to say you are “in” the United States REpublic?

Are you eager to say you are “in” the United States REpublic?                                                                                              ‘republic 786’

Defined: ‘RE public’ = you consent to be RE-presented in a body politic (association), a choice to be independent dependent of on others.

The Declaration of Independence 1776 created separation from a monarchy (King Rule).
Once separated, how where the people governed?
The answer, though not commonly known, is ‘common law’.
Common law is simply a fair, biblical trial, of “your” community.
Life was simple, one could do as he wished as long as he did not violate the right of another man, and when a violation was claimed by a man six to twelve men (common law jury) decided the legitimacy of that claim and ordered remedy.
Then came the offer of a ‘republic’ form of government.
So what happens to ‘independence’?
Did it change, did it disappear?
The answer is no. Only you can consent to change.
How?
By contracting with the ‘republic’ government.
Apart from contract you are independent, with contract you have ‘limited’ association obligations.
Now if you are in a US court and they show evidence of ‘association’ (contract) with the US government, the court now has evidence of personal jurisdiction, and they proceed to destroy you.
US courts have taken on demonic practices, you are highly unlikely to get justice in such a court.
Solution is? Stay independent. Force them to prove association (contract, consent).
If they can not, they have no jurisdiction to proceed, and they must shift to a common law court which they (US agents) seldom win in.
US courts insure US progress, US progress is “statism”, statism is the opposite of independence.
Americans safety is in God, God in not allowed in US courts, God is the foundation of common law courts.

For a man to use a “tool” we call “a republic” to manage entities is one thing, such use is far different than a man consenting to be governed by “a republic”. The government communicated to me that registering to vote is seeking governance.

So the next time you associate yourself with “the REpublic” you may be assuring a loss of the “Independence” you really hope for.

My services provided “HERE” help assure “independence”.

Paul John Hansen 4-2016

‘PaulSevere’ Twitterer User is only for association with topics found in the main them of this site, “Independence”.
If you wish to be tweeted when I put a substantive new page up just click HERE > and join my twitterer world.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System. Counsel time and a vast array of briefs, motions, case law, legal challenges, etc.

Protected: How To mail, ‘First Class’, and ‘Certified’, USPS, anywhere in America for 3 cents, “every” time. M1Sp-38, 3$.

Posted: 5th April 2016 by admin in Mailing 3 Cents
Comments Off on Protected: How To mail, ‘First Class’, and ‘Certified’, USPS, anywhere in America for 3 cents, “every” time. M1Sp-38, 3$.

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

“Resident”, very bad label.

Posted: 5th April 2016 by admin in Resident
Comments Off on “Resident”, very bad label.

“Resident”, very bad label.

The term seems un-threatening, not even close to what the word “subject” would impress, yet it is the same.

When you are asked if you are a resident when in a US form they are asking are you one of our subjects.

Guess what only a “resident” can get a “state” license.

They can only license their people.

Being independent of them gives you full latitude to do that which harms no one, or no one’s property.

Cross the land unregulated.

They must prove you are a resident so keep in control.

Only respond to such questions with questions as- “do you have any evidence in your possession that I am a resident”?

MORE on Resident “in the state”. Click Resident.

IRS say this man not required to ever use his SS number for identification.

Posted: 19th March 2016 by admin in Social Security Number
Comments Off on IRS say this man not required to ever use his SS number for identification.

IRS agent say this man not required to ever use his SS number for identification.

IRS says in the document – “he has the right to not want to use this SSN for any purpose or reason.”

Dan_SS_Form

I, Paul Hansen, personally will be seeking this same document from the IRS office, when I het it I’ll post it here also. Today’s date is 3/19/2016.

Show this to every bank, or any person that “claims” they require a SSN.

>>

The “Taco Bell” Case

Date: October 26, 1997 
Subject: Taco Bell Employment Application 
Social Security number optional?

This evening I spoke with Mr. Arthur Thomas, whose son’s encounter with Taco Bell in 1993 resulted in an out of court settlement in favor of the young Thomas as well as a Taco Bell employment application with a box stating “Social Security Number(optional)“. As I have heard all manner of reports and speculations regarding the Taco Bell situation, I will first briefly clear up the basic facts of this matter, as reported to me by Arthur Thomas.

Mr. Thomas’ son applied for a job with Taco Bell in 1993 and was told he could not be hired without supplying a Social Security number. Arthur Thomas put together some paperwork which informed Taco Bell of the pertinent law on the subject and provided the company with a copy of the EEOC case against Information Systems Consulting of Texas.

[In 1992, the EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) filed an action in U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division (CA3-92-0169-T) against Information Systems Consulting (I.S.C.) for firing Bruce Hanson (an employee) on 8-15-89 solely because he would not provide the company with a SSN that he did not have due to his religious beliefs.]

It is important to note that a court case was never filed by the Thomases. Taco Bell entered into a settlement agreement with the the young Mr. Thomas prior to the filing of any legal action and “settled amicably for money [the amount young Thomas would have earned working for Taco Bell during that summer] and an offer of employment on condition he would agree not to sue.”

It is true that Taco Bell, subsequent to this matter, did change its employment application to show the Social Security number as “optional”; however, according to Mr. Thomas, the “offer of employment” made by Taco Bell in its agreement with his son did not indicate that they would hire him without a Social Security number. After the settlement, young Thomas did not pursue employment with Taco Bell or further challenge the Social Security number issue, choosing instead to go on a mission for his church.

Further, according to Arthur Thomas, Taco Bell’s stated policy through its current parent company, Pepsico (a multi-national corporation), is to not hire anyone without a Social Security number, as a “political issue consideration” — this in spite of their job application which says “Social Security Number (optional)”.

Apparently this policy has been voiced by employment office personnel, but Arthur Thomas has not actually seen the policy in writing; to his knowledge, no one since his son’s case has challenged Taco Bell (Pepsico) on this policy.

A complete account of the Taco Bell matter is available in book form, “Getting Hired Without a Social Security Number” (a two inch thick three ring binder, eight chapters, including the complete EEOC case mentioned above), from Hilltop Corp., P.O. Box 82, Milford, Ohio 45150 ($35 price includes shipping).

Now, the unexpected news. Arthur Thomas informed me of a company known as “Personnel Supply Co.” which over the past two years has been successful in getting people jobs without the need for them to have or provide Social Security numbers. The company is based off-shore, hires people on a contract basis, and then contracts for services with your company of choice. Of course, not all companies are willing to hire on a contract basis, but Arthur Thomas reports that Hilltop Corp. provides several pages of legal and financial information which have proven highly effective in persuading companies of the significant advantages of contracted services.

Information about “Personnel Supply Co.” may be obtained by contacting Arthur Thomas, c/o Hilltop Corp., P.O. Box 82, Milford, Ohio 45150. I have only Arthur Thomas’ representations about “Personnel Supply Co.” There are fees involved with their services.

As with any other information or services offered by anyone or any organization, I encourage those who may be interested to investigate fully, make every attempt to get unbiased references, and take care to thoroughly research all laws which may relate to actions you are considering.

Author unknown.

>>

President Declares Limited Jurisdiction

Posted: 10th March 2016 by admin in Territorial jurisdiction
Comments Off on President Declares Limited Jurisdiction

Thomas Jefferson, in the Kentucky Resolutions, 1798:

… “the Constitution of the United States, having delegated to Congress a power to punish treason, counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States, piracies, and felonies committed on the high seas, and offenses against the law of nations, and no other crimes whatsoever;”

Jefferson first elected president in 1800 having two terms in office (1801-1809). Now one would think that this participating founding father, greatly involved in creating the US Constitution, would know the intent of its limited jurisdiction. The above is true today as it was in 1789, all the additional “force” that the US “purports” as having authority to do today can only amount to “contract”, so learn not to contract with the UNITED STATES. A forced contract is no contract, but rather slavery, to which is prohibited in America and by Gods law. Now remember the US constitution is for US “persons”, acts done on US “owned” land, and is US law, all the people and non-US land (private property) is governed by your community by common law courts of record (12 God fearing neighbors). The US agents think is a myth until you show them the written law. Order my Territorial Jurisdiction PowerPoint to learn the truth.

Recently I noticed a head federal prosecutor of this fact and she resigned one day before my court appearance, that being the fourth prosecutor in four (4) years.

Testimonials

Posted: 7th March 2016 by admin in Testimonials
Comments Off on Testimonials

MORE – This site is connected to both freeinhabitant.info and pauljjhansen.com.
Read the rest of this entry »

State “Registration” is State Confiscation.

Posted: 14th October 2014 by admin in Registration
4

“Registration” comes from Latin “rex, regis” etc. meaning regal.

So think about what occurs to whatever you ‘register’ – you hand legal title over to the Crown. When you register anything with the public, it releases legal title to the government corporation and leaves you with only equitable title – the right to use, not own, and for that use you will pay a ‘use’ tax which is every tax, be it income, sin, sales, property, etc. as opposed to lawful taxes – excise and impost. So that it doesn’t appear that the government now owns the property which you have registered they put it in a name which so much resembles your own that you won’t suspect it, however, the NAME is owned by the government. If you choose rather to record your legal title to your property with the public, you maintain your status as Title Owner. This is one of the most important things you can ever learn for the sake of your commercial affairs. –Mary Elizabeth: Croft

 

I (Hansen) only agree in part to Mary’s argument yet this can be overcome by a ‘court of record’ trial by jury’, common law challenge hearing. They say they have a legal interest in the property when it is registered, I believe it is not ownership but possibly a contract relationship foremost.

Three years, no plates, police refuse to tow, WHY?

Posted: 8th October 2014 by admin in Travel Rights
Comments Off on Three years, no plates, police refuse to tow, WHY?

I, Paul John Hansen, also have been parked for 2 years and they refuse to tow with a similar plate / notice. They use to tow me all the time, then I gave them legal notice and it all stopped. 2014.

20161003_121034

Older Entries
Newer Entries