Note when I, the host of this site, Paul Hansen, uses ‘free inhabitant’ I now define the term so that is is clearly different from one associated with the US.
Click on the below, a document created by a great organization sedm.org for a distinction of a NONResident v. Inhabitant.
https://www.facebook.com/DailyMentions/videos/597265837285077/
Repealing the 2nd Amendment, say what???
First the 10 individual amendments that were selected as part of the ‘Bill of Rights’ (i.e. 10 Amendments of 1791) are not written ‘law’, they are enumerated, unalienable ‘rights’.
Congress cannot, as is true with all men, take a right from another man, except for criminal punishment, on American soil.
Congress has no authority to take the ‘right to bear arms’, from any man, period, for such is unconstitutional. Simply put congress was never constituted with that authority by the American People.
Now if all congress would vote to remove any right such act would have no effect on that right, legally or constitutionally.
All 10 of the ‘Bill of Rights’ have existed for mankind from the beginning and will be until the end.
So what can a congress on American soil legislate?
They can only legislate the intent of their given constituted authority, which is military necessity/purpose, which naturally is inseparable from all nations.
So as to ‘the right to bear arms’ can only be restricted, governed, altered, in military purposed land*.
The United States can only own land for military purpose.
The United States must part with land that is not utilized for a military purpose within 5 years* of taking possession of such land.
An American has no right to carry anything in any military purposed land.
An American has no right to even be in military purposed land.
Any man in military purposed land can only have permission to be in such land.
The ‘Bill of Rights’ does not operate in military purposed lands.
Approximately 24% of America is military purposed land (land owned by ‘The United States of America’).
Approximately 76% of America is non-military purposed land (land not owned by ‘The United States of America’).
Congress governs arms on the 24%.
American People, by American common law, governs arms on the 76%.
If you are in a US court and the charged activity occurred in land not evidenced as of the 24%, you are in the wrong court.
Three things that are paramount in court: 1. territorial jurisdiction, 2. territorial jurisdiction, and lastly 3. territorial jurisdiction.
Utilize the ‘American Common Law Court’ (7th Amendment/right).
Contact Lawyer-Hansen for the document procedure to ‘challenge’ territorial jurisdiction, with estoppel. freeinhabitant.info.
((Land* = Space – one is not on land, one is in land, in a space. In, within, land. To be on a space is to be not within the space. The US courts will use this legal trickery to secure faulty territorial jurisdiction determinations. The Alice in Wonderland = Wonderspace.))
GOVERNMENT CODE, TITLE 10. GENERAL GOVERNMENT, SUBTITLE E. GOVERNMENT PROPERTY CHAPTER 2204. ACQUISITION OF LAND FOR STATE AND FEDERAL PURPOSES, SUBCHAPTER A. ACQUISITION OF LAND BY STATE, Sec. 2204.304. REVERSION TO STATE ON NONUSE. A grant under this subchapter must contain a reservation providing that if any part of the property granted ceases to be used for the purposes set out in Section 2204.301 for a continuous period of five years*, that part shall immediately and automatically revert to this state at the end of that period.
P.S. – Attorneys of the ‘BAR ASSOCIATION‘ that utilize such challenges get barred from association. Most attorneys, and congressmen, that understand this are privileged traitors.
INTRO: (Click on the COLORED below for link access.)
Administrative Process (AP) = (Non-Judicial request for remedy, INFO, Declaration of ‘state compelling interest’, notice of trespass, and gives notice of law at the same time.) Notary Presentment.
AP is a process that is respected in all US statutory courts , and American common law courts.
It is a tool that forces an answer from any man that may be making a claim on America soil.
The Petitioner (you) send, with aid of notary (me), by certified mailing, to the Respondent (them), clearly, precisely, written negative and positive averments*, and Admissions.
Respondent must reply by sworn affidavit to each point.
If no response is made the facts shall be deemed, as true, as stated, as written, by Petitioner, as evidence for use in any court in America.
See M1S-65 at Click> HERE.
As a lawyer I believe this is by far the most important tool to force any man, or any government agent, to full transparency. Most US, and state written laws, are unconstitutionally applied because government agents are almost never compelled in a state court to give full disclosure to all the elements of written law they are attempting to enforce. I have had four high level officers of US government resign from their job when I served this AP upon them, for once they are duly noticed they are now personally liable for all acts outside of the scope of the written law they are utilizing. This includes all US administrators (statism, state-ist, judges).
|
NOTICE: If you have paid for services that are highly technical and of the type that may not be implemented for several years as strategies are assembled and evaluated. Such is done so that when implemented you will get the most for your money. I have recently worked with the highest level legal minds in the nation who are constantly attempting to construct strategies to stop the expansion of ‘statism’ and its ever expanding deprivation of clearly defined God given rights. So if you are such a person please contact us no less than every six months to inquire as to progress. Due to computer hacking, and record complications, your purchased service needs may have become mistakenly, unnoticed presently. NOTICE: Paul John Hansen never puts himself out as an ‘association’ BAR member, or acting attorney. And the use of the term ‘lawyer’* is only to communicate (Hansen’s) chosen profession (<CLICK), as the right of man, independent of any state, legal entities, or associations, as stated. Paul John Hansen does not wish to do business in land of any United States Jurisdiction. (*lawyer, lauier, lawer, lawere (mid-14c. as a surname), -one versed in law, one whose profession is suits in court, or client advice on legal rights, having no association with any activity with license, or professional associations’.) If the term attorney, or lawyer, appears in this site, or any web site used by Hansen, that alludes to any licensed activity it has been placed there by hackers, and Hansen asks that such be noticed to him so it can be corrected immediately. Paul John Hansen
|
NOTARY COMMISSION No. 804917, STATE OF IOWA —
If you need proof of service.
If you are out of state, or in state, PDF me a copy of the signed documents and I’ll mail them as a NOTARY OF THE STATE (An Officer of the Court), this serves as legal service in all jurisdictions in America Common Law courts, and also in all US courts.
Administrative Process with Notary Presentment can be a tremendous tool to force any man, state or private, to provide evidence for you to win a judgment, that you generally can not get in a US court environment in many cases.
See M1S-65 (MS10065) at > CLICK HERE.
I can generally do it at a very low cost, mostly because it needs to be done, much of America’s liberties depends on this.
Paul John Hansen – pauljjhansenLAW@gmail.com
Estimated Cost:
Generally, a single notary presentment mailing takes between 15 to 30 minutes. It all depends on how large the mailing is, how many people it is mailed to, (more people generally gets the cost down per mailing due to efficiency due to volume), how organized it is when I get it, and how much difficulty I have in assembling the product and filling in all the documents as to the mailing affidavit. The more the client does the less I have to do, thus a lower charge from me. I presently charge 35$ per hour. Each mailing has two notary actions on my end. My aiding notary generally does not charge for his services, and I only charge 35$ per hour, so if it only takes 15 minutes it is only $8.75 for labor plus the printing, envelopes, and certified mailing charge by USPS. I have done close to one hundred mailing and have never had a client complain of the cost, most say I am half the fee of other notaries. I also act as the receiving party for any reply from the mailing as additional evidence for the court process. This process is a 7th amendment court recognized process.
We need able men across the country who are willing to provide godly aid for jury determinations in Common Law proceedings.
If the Lord would so lead you to commit contact the court clerks office at > courtclerk107@gmail.com
This court will utilize the internet to provide due process for each participant. The safest adjudicating hands on earth are of those of a Christian based jury.
Federal* Supreme Court, of the People, (< styled name.)
Common Law Venue; Original and Exclusive Jurisdiction,
A superior court sitting with the power of a circuit, in ‘United States of America’*,
in and of de jure counties.
Court record of – ‘Independent Jural Society Community Court’.
(This court is fully validated with US court rulings, and thousands of years of operation. Come and see how attorneys use this court to get justice that is often not available in US statutory courts.)
– 7th Amendment, Bill of Rights, US Constitution – “In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.”
– NW Ordinance 1787, Art. 2 “… Trial by Jury, and of judicial proceedings according to the course of the Common Law.”
– (a) Saving to suitors, in all cases, the Right to a Common Law Remedy, where the Common Law is competent to give it;
– Christian Law and Common Law is synonymous” – Strauss v. Strauss, 3 So. 2nd 772 at 728 (1941).
– “the Law of the Land” means “the Common Law“. – State v. Simmon, 2 Spears 761, at 767 (1884).
Terms Defined:
‘United States of America‘* – proper noun. A country, a people, occupying most of the southern half of North America and including also Alaska and the Hawaiian Islands.
((Hansen comments.))
Sovereignty was first recognized by the high Court in this case.
CHISHOLM, Ex’r. versus GEORGIA.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED
STATES, 2 U.S. 419; 1 L. Ed. 440; 1793 U.S.
LEXIS 249; 2 Dall. 419
“To the Constitution of the United States the term
SOVEREIGN, is totally unknown. There is but one place
where it could have been used with propriety. But, even in
that place it would not, perhaps, have comported with the
delicacy of those, who ordained [***86] and established
that Constitution. They might have announced themselves
“SOVEREIGN” people of the United States: But serenely
conscious of the fact, they avoided the ostentatious
declaration.”
((No man as to his being associated with the fiction ‘United States’ remains sovereign as to that relationship, he too becomes a legal person (fiction), at parity, but yet his sovereignty remains on his private side.))
“As the State has claimed precedence of the people; so, in
the same inverted course of things, the Government has
often claimed precedence of the State; and to this
perversion in the Second degree, many of the volumes of
confusion concerning sovereignty owe their existence.”
((State precedence can only be over the ‘person’ (the fiction) (contracted terms), never over the man, for such can not waive any right, or yield precedence to another.))
Sovereignty was defined and those who are sovereign were identified by this case; and, it is the standing law on sovereignty today.
Supreme Court in DRED SCOTT v. JOHN F. A. SANDFORD, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), where the High Court stated, in relevant part:
@ 404
“…The words “people of the United States” and “citizens” are
synonymous terms, and mean the same thing. They both describe the political
body who, according to our republican institutions, form the sovereignty,
and who hold the power and conduct the Government through their
representatives. They are what we familiarly call the ‘sovereign people’, and
every citizen is one of this people, and a constituent member of this
sovereignty…”
((Sovereignty only in the institution (government), that only goes to consent to being governed, one that has not consented is not a party to this institution.))
“It is true, every person, and every class and description of persons, who were
at the time of the adoption of the Constitution recognized as citizens in
the several States, became also citizens of this new political body; but none
other; it was formed by them, and for them and their posterity, but for no one
else. And the personal rights and privileges guarantied to citizens of this new
sovereignty were intended to embrace those only who were then members
of the several State communities, or who should afterwards by
birthright or otherwise become members, according to the provisions
of the Constitution and the principles on which it was founded.” (emphasis
added) Scott v. Sanford, 60 U.S. 393, at 406.
((I want independence from any state to which I have not, upon full disclosure, consented to association, contract. The above is bad if it is a state not compliant to your wishes, good if it is. All such states today are not of my wish today. I wish not associate, contract.))
Even the States recognize this sovereignty.
R. W. Kemper v. The State,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
63 Tex. Crim. 1; 138 S.W. 1025; 1911 Tex. Crim. App.
LEXIS 365
“The rule in America is that the American people are the
sovereign, and in them is lodged all power, and the agencies of
government possess no authority save that which is delegated
to them by the people…”. Also, see Perry v. United States,
294 US 330, 353 (1935), “The Congress as the instrumentality
of **sovereignty is endowed with certain powers to be exerted on
behalf of the people in the manner and with the effect the
Constitution ordains. The Congress cannot invoke the
sovereign power of the people to override their will as thus
declared.”
((America is not the same as United States, the first is a nation, the second, a tool of that nation.))
((This **sovereignty is in house, not to be confused with the people not of that house.))
((I conclude that I wish independence of these body politics. They look good on the surface, but all are addressing those that consent to be governed by them.))
Another One Bites The Dust, 13K$ Credit Card Victory
I have won every credit card case I have ever been involved with in the last 1o years.
BRANCH BANKING & TRUST CO. Bladen County, North Carolina
My client had a $13,581.33 claimed outstanding credit card bill due to the above bank.
We challenged all the elements of evidence of a true loan of substantive funds.
The bank folded and dismissed the court case.
Banks are limited, by congress, to only lending “true” designated funds, they use to do this, now seldom do it.
The result is massive profits for the bank, and massive inflation for your community.
Take responsible banking and sound money back for you and your community, most every extension of credit by banks today are not compliant with congressional law, or biblical law.
This is why your savings are not worth saving.
This is crime to the trillionth degree.
Crime that is robing your local community of millions of dollars every year.
Hire me, I can generally cancel you outstanding credit balances, that is due, with any bank in America.
“State” officers treat “vehicles” in their system as “state” property with a “state” legal interest.
Remove the evidence of a “state” interest and you are generally left alone. If not you can sue for damages.
How to remove you *VIN from the state Department of Vehicles Registration system.
Yes you can follow a process that takes the present VIN out of the state system.
This removes all association, assumed contract with the state, away from your now private property.
After this removal you can re-“record” (for a public record) it in our internet site for private “Record of Owners” where proof of ownership is further assured.
At all times during recreational travel:
With your 15$ payment for the M1S-56 Package you will have step by step instructions of how to perfect the removal, and you will also have perpetual use of the “Owner of Record” internet site to record your property, along with all the stories (good and bad) from others that are doing the same process across the nation.
Let us work together to perfect “right to travel”, as many are seeking such all across our land.
*VIN defined – ‘Vehicle Identification Number’ in U.S. state jurisdiction, and ‘*Chassis Number’ in mans jurisdiction.